Cookies help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting this way.

User Menu










Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book



YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines


Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video




  • *Total Members: 81843
  • *Latest: yosri123

  • *Total Posts: 488417
  • *Total Topics: 14370
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 222
  • *Total: 228


Author Topic: Magnetic, And, Gravity, Motor, Update, And Notes  (Read 4065 times)

Offline guest1289

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
Re: Magnetic, And, Gravity, Motor, Update, And Notes
« Reply #30 on: June 29, 2017, 10:58:03 PM »
    Imploder For Producing  'Strangelets'

     I think(  not sure ) that mine, and other peoples  overunity  designs/devices( excluding my purely magnet-motor designs,  but  including my  broken-symmetry-of-sticky-points-electrical-generator ) ,  would get the  free-energy/extra-energy  from the environment.
     I think it would be in the form of  photons?/quarks?  floating or moving  in the vacuum ,  in other words  photons?/quarks?  would  be sucked into the iron-cores( cores sitting inside coils ),  or maybe sucked directly into the coils ,  or other components.
     (  I had read about research where it was claimed that a  specific-frequency for an  iron-core had produced  overunity,  and that research( or article about it ) claimed the   iron-core  was drawing the  overunity/extra-energy  from it's environment.   )

        But many people believe that the  free-energy/extra-energy  would come from  ions  floating in the environment.   
        If they are correct,  then these devices would either not work in the vacuum of space,  or would produce much less free-energy,  even though there is still a quantity of  ions per square-meter  in space.  )

      My idea is that these devices could be used as the basis for devices to produce  'strangelets'( matter  which has the density of protons/neutrons ).   Although I assume that past a certain size 'strangelets' would sink straight to the earth's-core, if not causing any other problem.

      Maybe one method,   would be to  'very-suddenly'  disconnect a  'Secondary-Load'( energy-consumer ) connected to the  overunity-device,   'Note'  that  this  'Secondary-Load'  would not be a  'load'  that  spins  or powers  the  overunity-device,  it would just be an energy-consumer,       
       SO THAT  then,    photons?/quarks?  being sucked into a specially designed   'electromagnetic-cone'  would be compressed together to produce  strangelets .

      My following idea is not completely logical :
         - My original idea was that if an   'electric-motor'  was  the   'Secondary-Load'( energy-consumer ) connected to the  overunity-device,   'Note'  that this  'electric-motor'  would not be the  'electric-motor' that spins  the  overunity-device,  it would just be an energy-consumer,       
            SO THAT  then,    if you would  then  use  a  3rd-electric-motor( which is not electrically connected to the  overunity-device )  to  spin(  via gear-wheels or something )  the   'Secondary-Load'/'electric-motor'( energy-consumer )  MUCH FASTER  than  it is actually being powered at,   that  that would cause a  'VERY-UN-NATURAL-ENERGY-DRAWING-EFFECT' ,   and result in the production of a  strangelet.
            However,  a problem with this particular version of the   'Imploder-Idea'   is that you may not be certain where abouts in the  overunity-device  the compression of photons?/quarks? may occur( as a result of the  'VERY-UN-NATURAL-ENERGY-DRAWING-EFFECT' ),  so that you may not be sure where in the  overunity-device  to put something like an  'electromagnetic-cone' to compress  photons?/quarks? .

   Note :  Yes,  I know or assume,   that photons?/quarks? have no electric-charge and that they are probably not  affected by magnetic-fields,  so the use of  an  'electromagnetic-cone' would very possibly be useless.
               These types of details are things that I would probably never bother studying,  for various reasons  etc.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Offline guest1289

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
Re: Magnetic, And, Gravity, Motor, Update, And Notes
« Reply #31 on: June 30, 2017, 12:41:10 AM »
    The  Negative-Resistor

    I  thought of  another possible  answer as to how the 'Negative-Resistor' described on  may have worked .

    I thought that it may have been a type of  cathode-ray-tube,  but obviously not used to produce images,  instead they may have used  crt's just for the beam of  electrons.
    Normally in wiring/conductors  electrons are apart from each other,  scattered about,   so that their  electric-fields( electro-magnetic-fields? ) are  diluted? by the wiring/conductor material.

    Electric-Current  is primarily  composed of    'Electromotive-Force'( which is made of electro-magnetic-field?, energy-plasma?, photons?/quarks? ),  although the source of the 'Electromotive-Force'  is  electrons.

    So,  If you have a beam of electrons in a vacuum, like in a  cathode-ray-tube,  you have a very un-natural  situation,  it is like a line composed of the  most efficient-batteries in existence,  so if you could minimize energy losses enough,  in a closed-circuit  containing the  cathode-ray-tube,   it could maybe be an  overunity  and/or  self-running-device, 
    Especially when you consider that the   number of electrons  in the beam of the  CRT  will not be  soaked up by the wiring/conductors  of the closed-circuit  because usually these materials have exactly the number of the electrons that they need and they will resist absorbing more than they naturally require.


         - Up until a year or so ago I read and understood via  Wikipedia's-pages  that  'electric-current'  is primarily composed of    'Electromotive-Force'( ) flowing through conductors,  and that electrons merely drift through the conductor,  although I assume that the source of the  'Electromotive-Force' is the electrons.
           Now on  Wikipedia's-pages  I read that the electrons flow in the opposite direction to the  electric-current.
           Not only has  Wikipedia  possibly changed what I read about 'electric-current'  being primarily  composed of    'Electromotive-Force',   but it has also become more complicated.
           I ASSUME THAT WHAT I ORIGINALLY READ ABOUT  'electric-current'  being primarily  composed of    'Electromotive-Force',  is not now being suppressed ,  I don't know.

     CRT Curiosities
     I had been thinking about crt's,   and the more I thought about them,  the more unexplained and curious they become,  but now I forgot some of my questions etc.

    One important question I can't find the answer to,   is that I cannot see how a closed-circuit is formed to allow the  electrons  hitting the  'phosphor-coated-tv-screen'   to be directed back into the  tv-circuit,   are these just wasted  electrons that  vaporize  when they hit the  'phosphor-coated-tv-screen',  so that the  'wall-power-socket'  is providing a constant supply of  100%-disposable-electrons,   that's totally different to how I thought electricity works,   and I never realized that  electricity can work that way.
      - Maybe this is some kind of  quirk  of  Alernating-Current
     -  I assume it's not some type of  knowledge-suppression,  and  that the truth is that it is actually  photons or  'pulses-of-electromotive-force', that are actually hitting the   'phosphor-coated-tv-screen',  instead of electrons.
         I'm sure there are lot of scientific-tests existing proving it is actually electrons,  and not anything else.
          -  If it was photons or  'pulses-of-electromotive-force', that are actually hitting the   'phosphor-coated-tv-screen',  then  why would a handheld-magnet  be able to warp the image on a crt,  since photons are un-affected  by purely  magnetic-fields.

     Also,  exactly how can a  handheld-magnet  warp the image on a crt ,  electrons only have an electric-field,  and that electric-field  is affected by the  electro-magnetic-fields  of the  electro-magnets  built into the  crt,   to direct the electron to a specific spot on the tv-screen
     Although obviously,   the source of the  magnetic-field  from the  handheld-magnet  is actually electrons.

    Note : Yes, it seems that probably,  the problem is that I don't sufficiently understand how a crt for tv's works,  despite reading the  wikipedia-page,  that's not a criticism of the website, because I think the answer is probably on the  wikipedia-pages  for the devices that pre-dated the crt for tv's.

Offline guest1289

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
Re: Magnetic, And, Gravity, Motor, Update, And Notes
« Reply #32 on: June 30, 2017, 02:12:02 AM »
   Using The Time-Dilation Effect Of Centrifuge- Like Devices To Achieve Overunity

    It 'may' be  the Time-Dilation Effect that is responsible for various unexplained phenomenon that people have noticed about gyroscopes etc.

    Obviously from the center of a centrifuge-like device to it's outer rim,  the greatest time-dilation 'time-difference' occurs between the 'center' and the 'outer-rim',  if for example the radius is 5cm,  then at each .05mm increment of the radius the effect is very little or non-existent compared to that at the  'outer-rim', 
      In other words you  cannot  point at any exact  1-point on the radius as being where this effect occurs,   you can only compare  the 'center' to the 'outer-rim'( or to any point on the  radius ),   so it's all relative,  almost like it's non existent( or maybe it is non-existent ).   

    An Idea
    One of my ideas is to have the center of the  spinning-wheel  be a cathode,  and a point on the rim be an anode,  and have a spark jump between the two
     -  The spark could jump in a vacuum
     -  Or,  the electricity could travel between the cathode and the anode simply via a wire or via a superconductor.
     I'm thinking that since  individual-electrons  spin so fast in their orbits,  that they already experience  time-dilation, 
     And that because  electric-current  travels so fast,   that it also  already  experiences time-dilation

            SO,  I'm thinking that mixing the  time-dilation  experienced by  electrons  and  electric-current,   WITH  the time-dilation  effect of  centrifuge-like devices,  that it  will possibly amplify some sort of effect of broken-symmetry  in the overall  situation,   possibly by adding( bringing )  electrical-current-material( electrons?, photons?, electro-motive-force? ) from another point in time 'INTO'  the  'PRESENT'-Electrical-Output( the closed-circuit means it's also the input ) of the device.


   The Siberian-Coliu Device
   This device is too difficult for me to see how it was claimed to have functioned,  even though I read as much as possible,  since I have no actual educational background in anything related to this website.   

   However,  what I'm really interested in is that  'composite-disk-magnet' :
    -  From a side-view( and from above ),  how does it appear on  magnetic-field-viewing-film
    - And,  much more interestingly( but directly related to the above ),   how does it behave in the  'Faraday-Paradox'  tests :
         -  'Faraday-Paradox'  test -   a disk-magnet  rotating on it's own axis and unaffected by anything else will generate  an electric-current onto itself,  because it's own magnetic-field stays stationary,  so it  acts  against the disk-magnet  to generate a current
         -   And the other 2  'Faraday-Paradox'  tests may also be useful

     The more I think about that   'composite-disk-magnet'  the more difficult it is work out what it is or what goes on,  theoretically,  if any device using it  functioned successfully,  maybe it is because this   'composite-disk-magnet'  is a  'round-about'  way of creating a  magnetic-field  that is constantly flowing around in a  circle-? ,  a bit like putting together two  u-shaped-magnets together to form a  donut-magnet,  but obviously not the same.

Offline guest1289

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
Re: Magnetic, And, Gravity, Motor, Update, And Notes
« Reply #33 on: June 30, 2017, 03:40:26 AM »

    A  Spinning-Generator( using the 'broken-symmetry-of-sticky-points'  principle in  my Magnet-Motor-3.5 )
       - Generators( and electric-motors ) have cogging-torque, sticky-points that can be noticed when the device is not powered.
       - So, my-? idea( I assume commonly known ) is   'simply'  to put multiple generator-wheels  on the same  shaft,  but not having the coils from the different generator-wheels  aligned  with each other,  rather,  that they are completed  UNALIGNED  with each other.
           The  result would be that the sticky-points from one wheel would  actually  help another wheel to get  past it's own sticky-points,  and if you have enough generator-wheels  on the same  shaft,  the whole shaft should spin as  freely as if there are  'no'  generator-wheels  on the  shaft( only the weight/inertia would be noticed ).   

    Obviously ELECTRIC-MOTORS  also  have cogging-torque, sticky-points that can be noticed when the device is not powered.

    So you could use the method above in the  quoted-text  to eliminate that cogging-torque from  electric-motors,  by  placing multiple electric-motors on the same shaft etc,  etc,    HOWEVER,  I assume that the  result  would be that because the  cogging-points  would be neutralized that the electric-motors  would lose all grip and not turn at all-?,  but I am not actually sure what the result would be.
     Also,  in the idea in the quoted-text above :
A  Spinning-Generator( using the 'broken-symmetry-of-sticky-points'  principle in  my Magnet-Motor-3.5 )
        Think about how easy it would be to increase the power output of that device merely by geometrical means,     in other words simply increase the  'diameter'  of the generator-wheels( and use the extra space to add more coils etc ),  so the power output is increased.
         ( And you could use 100%-floating magnetic-bearings,  using permanent-magnets or electromagnets( those would need an initial temporary  external power-input )

   Also,   the  "Electric-motors turning Electric-generators" device  would/may  not actually need to contain any  permanent-magnets at all,  since you could achieve it all just with wiring / electro-magnets,   so initially you would need to feed the  device with electricity  to achieve the electromagnetic-fields  and then the device would then self-run without needing any external input.
   I read an article some weeks ago that apparently this had already been achieved 2 or 3 years ago.   

   Some weeks ago I read about a theory in classical-physics that explains overunity/free-energy( or at least in the situation that it explained it ),     basically the theory said something about particles that move through mediums in spiral-trajectories,  cause other particles in the medium to move in spiral-trajectories,  so that that effect is all amplified, repeated by each new particle caused to move in a  spiral-trajectory,   that certainly reminded me of my theory of what may happen in the  iron-cores( sitting inside coils ) of electromagnets or induction.
    (  I forgot to bookmark the website,  it may have been somewhere  on ,  or it may been some other site )


   To win against any debunker on this site that claims that no proof exists that any device has ever achieved  overunity and / or has been self-running,   

     -  You should remind them of how easy it is to defeat the laws of magnetic-levitation,   simply by floating an appropriately shaped  permanent-magnet  in the center/above a  donut-magnet , 
        To make it easier,  my idea is to add a string to the bottom of the floating-magnet and then to simply add an appropriate-weight( that constantly floats, it never touches any other object ) at the end of the string so that   the floating-magnet  is merely kept in place via gravity,  this definitely defeats the laws of magnetic-levitation, and at least one member on this site confirmed that using the  donut-magnet  works

     -  Then you should ask the debunker why this method to defeat the laws of magnetic-levitation  does not appear on the  wikipedia-page  for  magnetic-levitation,  or why any other method that defeats the laws of magnetic-levitation does not appear on the  wikipedia-page  for  magnetic-levitation or  anywhere else,  obviously it's because of suppression,  I assume because the floating-magnet apparently also exhibits perpetual-motion


Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: