Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: I have working idea for 6000$ usd  (Read 33559 times)

Zephir

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
    • Reddit about Aether Wave Theory
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #45 on: March 10, 2017, 11:55:57 AM »
Quote
Nature is always right.
Nature has its own secrets too - but it doesn't give them without thinking, work and attempts.
Once one idea doesn't work, some other may work instead.

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #46 on: March 10, 2017, 12:54:15 PM »
I need 4000$ Cad dollars, I show design. I will spend money too.

I once met a man, who claimed that he could make huge amounts of money if he only had a computer. He wanted to collect stock market data and to analyze it for hidden trends.

Then there are people who think that they could write a book if only they had a good word processor (a word processor is an electronic device or computer software application, that performs the task of composing, editing, formatting, and printing of documents).

And now we got you, thinking that you could build a OU-device if only you had a cad system for 4000.-- or 6000.-- Dollars.

There is nothing new under the sun. You follow the usual pattern of self delusion. Have fun as long as it lasts.

Greetings, Conrad

Lakes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #47 on: March 10, 2017, 01:23:42 PM »
Do they not do a 30 day trial version of the software?

Before spending a huge wedge of cash on it, I`d want to make sure it was up to the job!

Gabriele

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 248
    • Formerelax
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #48 on: March 10, 2017, 01:39:45 PM »
It is the same thing i sad to him,but perhaps i was misurnderstood. Why don't you try with a free trial of comsol?

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #49 on: March 10, 2017, 04:50:23 PM »
You cannot build such things by free trial that is not legal under EULA.

What do you mean, 4000$ is alot? I see gamblers put this money on stupid bluffs all the time. How come there is nobody rich here?

Wich of you is down for 500$ each, I need 8 of you. No open source bullshit, I understand that there is pollution but I need my million dollar one day. I can split that in 8 and be happy.

Its simple, you have a stake in a good idea for low input by you, you think 4000$ is enough and 1 month is enough to optimize what I need? No... I pay 3000$ more just for software.

What about future designs that I wanna bring to machine shop? What about stephen meyers cell and perhaps another thing I see and would like to design in 3d.

This software will last me a lifetime, I am also microcontroller "average" now for 5 years, I read everyday and now getting good finally, and for last yera I been studying control theory and scilab, to make good control system designs for robotics. I wish to design many things, many many things and show moving images to customers and future business partners. I will repay you one day.

All is 2 bird one stone, all the time. My brain has gotten very very big after CNC machine school, microcontrollers, control theory, scilab/xcos, idea searching of OU... Very big brain now.

4000$...Lol...That is not even enough to complete the idea, I will chase down manufacturing help after this.

No I did not meet such mathematical conclusion 45 minutes later :).

I still view this as 95% efficient that can be brought over the edge by use of impulse..

There is a whole stew pot of concepts here that I do not trust simulators. All this is 100% non linear and very creative,

What about aspden flywheel effect and inertial mass delay eggect? What about something already accelerating then get pulsed apparently here is also an efficiency gain.

I use this in very smart arrangement, I dont kid you. Its also simple to undrstand.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #50 on: March 10, 2017, 06:12:46 PM »
So who wish to be my business partners? I need help for this great idea.

My 2 best projects, my 2 babies must be brought to conclusion I before I start designing my future inventions with such 3d software, the next billion dollar evolution, the dentist robot, the machinist robot.

As CNC programmer, as machinist, as wannabee mechanical engineer, as microcontroller hobbyist, as wannabee electrical engineer, I will invent my own ideas from this day forward.
I need only money help.

I provide work, I need money, your work is welcomed when I get my money, however I will do my own thing.

We do this as private group, we dont share with losers I dont like them.

We work hard, we think hard, we build hard, nobody is entitled to our work this is not collectivism we are all individualist people in my team.

Nobody is gonna come here and spread that communist bullshit here, overunity is only for the worthy, infinite power is not meant for the unworthy.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #51 on: March 10, 2017, 06:32:30 PM »
If there were 'stupid rich people' here, which I assume by your posts
is the type of 'rich person' you are looking for:


Most of us would already have adequate funding to develop our research.


The fact of the matter is, any 'rich people' on this forum are likely too
intelligent to be scammed by your hooplah.
I'll be honest, you could try a lot harder...


Without any definitive proof to justify investment in you as a person or
Into any claims you present, you are not likely to obtain funding through
this venue.


Perhaps you can start your own forum called
Www.stupidrichpeople.com
Or something of the like.




ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #52 on: March 10, 2017, 06:41:05 PM »
If there were 'stupid rich people' here, which I assume by your posts
is the type of 'rich person' you are looking for:


Most of us would already have adequate funding to develop our research.


The fact of the matter is, any 'rich people' on this forum are likely too
intelligent to be scammed by your hooplah.
I'll be honest, you could try a lot harder...


Without any definitive proof to justify investment in you as a person or
Into any claims you present, you are not likely to obtain funding through
this venue.


Perhaps you can start your own forum called
Www.stupidrichpeople.com
Or something of the like.

I am not like most of you, your research is not expensive enough and it is not your research and I dont respect your ability to invent.

Get out of here and go follow failure projects for the rest of your life little lemming, we dont need you.

Where is the proof of anything that you have followed untill now, I tell you my proof is that I can get this to 95% efficiency but there is other opportunity in regards to pulses and kinetic energy
exchanges in this particular mehanical scenario.

I will not reveal to you in 3d manufactureable form, in high quality, the particular mechanical scenario I speak of, untill after I am payed the simulation is only necessary for optimization of mechanical forces and the best starting mechanism for resonance, the simulation does not implement the theories well enough because I base my device by combining aspden effect and theory of pulsed orbit under accelaration, all are impemented. I am not satisfied that normal implementation of mechanical force is 95% efficient and will not accept that pumping of the pendulum will be inferior to that.

What exactly do you bring to the table? Are you machinist or engineer? Are you electronics man? Did you practice invention for many years and have good opinions or are you just mad bullshitter?

When you see circuit or design, do you have capacity to re-engineer and deconstruct or you just copy?

If you are one of these people then your viewpoint is cheaply said, just like words.

If you have better design, show me or give me a glimpse, I wish to invest. Show me your work, how you thaink you cna provide the many kW needed.

Dont try to sell me working device or show me somebody who has for sale, I know its a lie I dont invest in lies, if its real its too expensive for me.

If you know somebody who has design show me, if you have patent of somebody else that you understand please advance that projects and provide me with 3d sketch using free trial.

Do not provide me with endless patent numbers of abstracted complicated technology for me to do all the work for you, study and save me time by filtering out most the work because you had particular passion for said patent.

If you have a theory dont speak in endless technical terms and bullshit terms in Tom Bearden fashion, make me a nice design or sketch in 3d please with perhaps a timing diagram of signals, I dont understand these paint drawings that dont implement correct drafting.

If you have idea, show me your skill, show me you are on the cutting edge, I wish to invest...

If you have nothing to say or offer then you should simply say and admit that you should give me money.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #53 on: March 10, 2017, 07:49:29 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsJDx2ldrHc&t=8s

Its the total evolution of this.

Total and complete implementation of many theories using this design, everything has ben figured out exept the the srtarting mechanism is still to be figured out for best cost.

Now we know that centrifugal force is Mass*omega^2*Radius, and we know that power is function of speed and torque, the more speed the more torque the better the more often you repeat the cyrcle the more speed the more torque, yes the more stronger the pulse needs to be but at what point can we optimize this? But a mass in motion wants to stay in motion and gives off massive force.

A 20kg weight running at 400 rpm with 1 meter radius generates 35,000 newtons of centrifugal force, my device can guide this force 100% in the direction we nee. I am not talking lighbulbs I am talking porsche like power.

The more clever the system and input mechanism the more efficiency ( I think, this is where the overunity science I am still unsure of kicks in), we have to remember that this is a freewheeling eccentric mass besides for its slight elliptical orbit, this has the effect of providing useable power, how this differs from usual circular orbit that simply transmits destructive force to bearing and whole bulding I dont know, I know however that not much input is required for a very dangerous heavy thing to start turning, What is the exact number of joules lost in this orbit? How can we best maintain this orbit and by what mechanism can we minimize loss. Here is where I say, the theories converge all in this device, all of them. The slingshot theory and aspden effect.

The real machine moves with much harmony and would make good mechanical artwork and could be sold back to some museum. for like 20,000$

Now you understand why I say it is the best mechanical device ever seen by this forum.

I am awaiting 4000$ to start the build, this will need further funding but once I am legeally free to optimize and propose concrete steps manufacturing I can more easily get funding.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #54 on: March 10, 2017, 08:59:11 PM »
Comsol looks extremely complicated and extremely expensive, I am not sure I can learn it. It looks awfully slow to get going also.

I still need to design the launching mechanism, wich is easier said than done. Very easy on algoryx tho, very very easy.

I already know Spaceclaim and Topsolid.

Algoryx has better software, they have the best. But topsolid can also work for the launching mechanism, their sim package is not so bad for the price.

The most important if to be able to provide a nice moving image to explain what I mean to the person with the further finances for the manufacturing.

This person is not like many of you folks, and me, he has alot of money and very little time, he has to say... "wow cool"...Ok, I see this as good risk to take.

Welder, cnc machines, measurements, parts, I will see how cheap this can be done but it will not be cheap, I will spend at least 4000$ from pocket alone.

For the FEA I'll hire a university student and he will optimize, then I'll know what my error margin is.

I can simulate an imperfect radial load repartition and graph and save that then bring him my studies so I can see how far I can push my linking components.

There will also be some major in detail design work overall beyond what I have already done, 1 month is not enough.

In the event that this is a total failure I will sell this to a museum and try to repay my backers.

Of course I will be very happy with my software, and then I will design robots and try to become rich, to try to pay back my backers.

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #55 on: March 13, 2017, 04:15:28 PM »
If you need state of the art software to simulate your cutting edge technology, you first need a software that can make 1+1=3. There is no such software around for $4000, or $100 000. You most probably get such software for free - made by a 2 year old kid who can't count.


It would be much more interesting looking into your design or idea in detail, so it is possible to make a proper analyzing of it.
If you ask me to look at it, I am happy to look at it, but unfortunately for you, you will not get the reply to want. I have revealed and debunked lots of ideas from people on this forum, and provided sufficient explanation to why the idea won't work in practice.
I have no economical interests in anything labeled OU. So I'm safe ;-)


Vidar

Zephir

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
    • Reddit about Aether Wave Theory
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #56 on: March 13, 2017, 04:56:52 PM »
The attempt to research the perpetuum mobile in simulation software is particularly futile, because this software is based just on energy conservation law.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #57 on: March 13, 2017, 04:58:45 PM »
This machine is sophisticated. I need to design carefully and legally, I say legally because I think it will work. Do you got money?

Simulator :) shows me that many elements come up to about 100% efficiency when I add motive force it = combination.

I read alot of things...Many names, all have their explanations. I simply combine all theories for my device.

I am not here to discuss the math of it, it's close to state of art minus  a the typical 20% or 30% loss, if you specialty is non linear physics, impulse science, if your name is Kanarev, maybe we could debunk this. I don't care about those who debunk with opinions, I've simmed what could be simmed and I wonder how low I can reduce my input by use of non standard methods. I Cannot accept that standard motive force will be superior to impulse in oscillatory orbit that goes through acceleration cycles.

Zephir

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
    • Reddit about Aether Wave Theory
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #58 on: March 13, 2017, 05:07:18 PM »
Working Model SW is free for 30 days and €29.95 for half year. For person intelligent enough for to design working perpetuum mobile it shouldn't be difficult to find a crack at web...;-)

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: I have working idea for 6000$ usd
« Reply #59 on: March 13, 2017, 05:57:30 PM »
What about Z plane ? and it's about designing launch mechanism. I use 2d and 3d, algodoo is pretty good software.
 
My goal is to have a well engineered test rig.

A small 4 element build would do the trick, but precise... Not wood. A generous 15 pound Would be good.

I need aerodynic design, low weight linkage, with emergency break, then I test. I don't want bad things to happen.

To tell you the truth, I need cad software for more than this,  it's for my device, it's  a for other device, it's  a how I work now and since I am good inventor I need shark tank type people, I for example, I'd design myself a Friedrich luling motor and iterate.

I can't just show my designs on YT with pirated shit, they have my IP, they know me, they told me not to crack.

You can't iterate well without cad. :-[