Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?  (Read 54584 times)

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #30 on: January 29, 2017, 04:54:15 PM »

Also, I would ask that you spend at least a minute or 2 giving it a go, sure you might not feel anything, plenty of people don't (with images, about half), but maybe it's worth a shot.


For me, personally feeling it would be of no use, as I have no way to
relate that experience to others.
For me, there needs to be a tool, apparatus, or system of interaction
that is not limited to our human senses.


The 'black box' experiments demonstrated that human perception
can be altered by our expectations. If we think there is something
in the box, then our experiences will reflect those thoughts. We may
feel heat or vibration from the box, see an 'aura' or field around the
box. Various other manifestations, all from an empty box.
Simply because we are told there is something in the box.




gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #31 on: January 29, 2017, 06:58:38 PM »
I am enlightened and that shows how right I am. My truth was given to me by higher forces whom you will never be able to understand.

Greetings, Conrad


Be aware, there is no "enlightened" one who would write such an egoistic statement. More like the opposite.

Kind regards

Luc


conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #32 on: January 29, 2017, 08:19:11 PM »


Quote
Be aware, there is no "enlightened" one who would write such an egoistic statement. More like the opposite.
Kind regards

Luc

Sarcasm, irony and parody seems not to be your strong side. Seriously, you believed that I were enlightended? And even stranger, you think there is such a thing as to be enlightened?

I am sure, the primordial energy was invented for you. You are made for it.

Relax, Conrad

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #33 on: January 29, 2017, 09:34:04 PM »
In truth I find most of us here to be enlightened,
Our desire for knowledge and truths separates us
From those whom are content with the mundane.

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #34 on: January 29, 2017, 11:39:41 PM »



Quote
In truth I find most of us here to be enlightened,
Our desire for knowledge and truths separates us
From those whom are content with the mundane.

Again, you see the primordial energy doing its magic in front of your eyes!

What more could Aether22 ever prove to you? Down with the mundane, up with the desire for the unbelievable! Never ever ask for proof, you will spoil the fun of the credulous.

May the primordial energy be with you, Conrad

P.S.: Attached a simple coil of wire oozing primordial energy. You clearly see the energy emanating from the tip of my thumbnail. It is the non-mundane, the miracle manifesting because I believe strongly.


Aether22, can you do better than that?
Gotoluc, is this enlightened enough?
Sm0ky2, is this non-mundane, does it quench your desire for knowledge?

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #35 on: January 30, 2017, 02:09:44 AM »

For me, personally feeling it would be of no use, as I have no way to
relate that experience to others.
For me, there needs to be a tool, apparatus, or system of interaction
that is not limited to our human senses.


The 'black box' experiments demonstrated that human perception
can be altered by our expectations. If we think there is something
in the box, then our experiences will reflect those thoughts. We may
feel heat or vibration from the box, see an 'aura' or field around the
box. Various other manifestations, all from an empty box.
Simply because we are told there is something in the box.


I very much respect the integrity of that view.
But I also have a counter-argument to make.
If you did feel it and felt it strongly enough that it was beyond what you could discount as "Placebo", then you could work with the energy and experiment with it.
Maybe you would not choose to do as I am doing and communicate it as evidence to others, but it could still be useful.


Until you develop it into something that does something empirically demonstrable.


Alas, I suspect that the power of the mind would keep you from feeling what is there, not make you feel what isn't.
Anyway drop me an email (berry.john22 at gmail.com) if and when you are willing to try and detect the "whatever" this technology effects.


If you will at least take my word for the fact that the results seen thus far are not sensibly explained away by the Placebo effect or anything mundane.


John




aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #36 on: January 30, 2017, 03:22:34 AM »


Again, you see the primordial energy doing its magic in front of your eyes!

What more could Aether22 ever prove to you? Down with the mundane, up with the desire for the unbelievable! Never ever ask for proof, you will spoil the fun of the credulous.

May the primordial energy be with you, Conrad

P.S.: Attached a simple coil of wire oozing primordial energy. You clearly see the energy emanating from the tip of my thumbnail. It is the non-mundane, the miracle manifesting because I believe strongly.


Aether22, can you do better than that?
Gotoluc, is this enlightened enough?
Sm0ky2, is this non-mundane, does it quench your desire for knowledge?
Go home conradelektro, you're drunk!

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #37 on: January 30, 2017, 06:41:33 AM »
Very productive 20 years that must have been. Show some results. Of course, proof is for the simple minded, you are beyond proof.


I discovered the basic insight, but your sarcasm is correct, I had 17 years of efforts with only some ideas to show for it.
If I could have "Imagined" results I would have.
If I were going to fake results I would have.


I had no history of feeling energy.


But if it were just me, I wouldn't be here mentioning it.  If I didn't have a pretty decent success rate, I wouldn't be making claims that sound impossible.


But to me truth is more important than "The way things are done".
The truth is that I am most people cannot readily imagine the degree of sensation that occurs most of the time I bug people to try my designs.


I have even made 2 identical looking designs one that was designed to work and one that was designed to subtly fail, and people could tell the difference.


It's not in the mind and it can be used to advance research and to me that is all that is important, not if it is "respected" by engineers or skeptics or people who do things in rigorously controlled ways with measures etc...


No early discoveries have had ready made meters, including electricity.


A tingle in your tongue, isn't that subjective?  Contract a frogs leg, don't dismembered things sometimes twitch anyway?
A compass needle moved, must have been the wind.


If you want to work at the fringe, make the new discoveries then you must be willing to crawl out beyond the established safe zones and be willing to care only about truth not rules.


If you are here and criticizing something you know nothing about and have not contacted me to try (I'm not sharing it publicly) because you are closed minded or because this does not fit your idea of what Free Energy research should look like, then I suggest maybe it is you that does not know how to reach from the known into the unknown.


The fact is that this "energy" is very well established in every culture and even in physics.  While it remains mostly mysterious, I am offering to the brave, to the people non conflicted with limiting beliefs and skeptical nonsense a way to go into this new area and to be re-assured all the way along as they will be able to feel the truth, and if they can't feel the truth they have no more place experimenting with it at this point that a blind person has performing surgery.


I am not offering to disclose anything here, as I am not releasing this to anyone who ever comes across this post, only to seekers.  As it would require some persistence to go beyond feeling the energies into learning and experimenting.
Because up to this point 99.9% of my effort has been experimenting with unpowered coils and graphics I have not made breakthroughs that are sure to be quickly made when these principles are skillfully added to the right setup.


IMO all proper Free Energy devices use this energy, and it is the primary and most critical key to their generation of excess energy, as such you do not need to build any new device to test this on, you can just change devices you build or have built.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #38 on: January 30, 2017, 07:35:22 AM »
Did you create these images? Or just came across them?


You said the paper can 'block it', this tells me it is absorbing
Or reflecting whatever this energy is.
The paper can be replaced by other things in an effort to
Identify the exact nature of this energy.


Your nervous system can detect heat, pressure, electric,
Magnetic, and light. So 'feeling' covers a broad spectrum
of sensory input.


Identifying it is the first step

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #39 on: January 30, 2017, 08:15:01 AM »



The images are my own work, but PLEASE don't make this about images.




The images are inferior, except they are easy to share.




Now the use of images to effect the aether did not begin with me.
But it certainly was established by, among others, Dan A. Davidson in the book "Shape Power".




The short version of the story is: Educated myself in conventional Physics, skeptical but seduced by claims of Antigravity and Free Energy.  Was aware the aether vortex theory, hated it, but then couldn't help but see the evidence for it.  Spent 17 years researching it with little to show before I made a coil that emitted a beam I and others could feel.  I experimented more and found that drawing and even images on a computer can effect the aether, I then developed this for the next several years getting stronger and stronger energies (subjectively), oh I also used the coils for healing earlier and got results that were miraculous and doubt erasing.  I have had hundreds of people feel energy from coils and images and the vast majority overall have felt energy, but a non-trivial number (which is less trivial on images sent around the net) don't, but still they are in the minority somewhat.  Many feel energies very strongly as I do so myself.




I tried to feel energy of different things before I had my success and if I have any ability to imagine a sensation, it is only to a very very slight level, I could never feel anything clear just from wanting to or believing.




But the problem is I am somewhat trapped by the easiness of development with images.  Just since I made the post my strongest works has increased as I have continued to experiment more.
When I show someone who felt my older work, my newer work, they often comment how much more powerful it is now.


Alas, even very strong energies don't make people who don't feel energy feel it.  My mother has been long suffering in trying these and she has felt the energy from them, but only very very seldom.


So I recognize that this is not normal research, no kidding.  But if you look past the unscientific facade, it is for those who feel something strongly enough to be impressed very clearly real.  And it gives a way to know how aetheric experiments are going and I can deliver a LOT that I have learnt, and this can be used to help have success in building Free Energy and Antigravity and other fringe, generally impossible results.


But it's not for everyone.  It isn't even for everyone who can feel it, and it is almost certainly not yet suitable for people who can't.




But it is for the pioneers among you who are happy to go off the beaten track.  Maybe you are the exception and should experiment with it even without even trying to feel it since you want to experiment not with making the "energy" but with detecting it.


As for heat and so-on.  Some people might feel the same energy (well, from the same device, unless the energy changed) differently.  So I don't know, I really don't.  Maybe it depends on the type and level of energy in that person, such that if they are subject to electrical energy most they are more likely to feel electrical energy when the energy from my images or coils hits their bodies energy.
When I have been feeling energy a lot my hands become extra sensitive to energy, but initially I could only feel energy in my right hand.  But as my exposure grows I can feel it in new places, left hand, face and chest most of all.  Earlier today a new design hit my head with energy was wasn't expected and gave me a headache for a second till I redirected it.

One difference to regular feeling is that with aetheric energy, you can feel things through you that would normally just be on the skin.  So most of what I feel personally has no regular analog as there is nothing normal that could penetrate, or nothing I have experience with.

John

Acca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 563
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #40 on: February 02, 2017, 06:23:29 PM »
 I have just read (all) posts here on this thread and did not get any benefit from the writings..
 
However my computer read the posts as I was doing physical work.. so  loss to me ..
 
Try this video clip as this a BBC clip on Chi.. and “THE” energy you may get the benefit..
 
 
Acca…
 Ps..... here is a Polish / Australian artist creation.. now RIP..

Sorry for such a large photo as it will make you feel better or NOT.. you determine that ..



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tTXFYrDd0E
 

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #41 on: February 02, 2017, 07:05:16 PM »
Concerning the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tTXFYrDd0E posted by Acca:

There are people with so called healing powers. And I could visit a few in person. In every culture the "faith healers" put forward a different sort of esoterics. In Asia it might be the Qi and in Middle Europe it is often in the context of religion and in South America and Africa something more shamanic. For some time there is an Indian influence all over the Western World like medidation.

According to my opinion and my experience, the show is all important in faith healing. The better the show, the more the patient and whoever takes part believes it. And believing is healing, so to speak.

I had the impression that the patient is healing himself. So, the faith healer helps the patient to help himself. And therefore all is very inconclusive and depends on the faith healer and the patient, even on the audience.

But it does not matter, whether you believe it is done by the healer or by the patient. Sometimes it works and very often it does not. And that is the problem, it is highly personal and can not be measured or be pressed in a theory.

If the show of a faith healer is good then I like it. And I do not like the more numerous bad show men or bad show women. And I do not like the people who talk about it like the knew something.

Greetings, Conrad

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #42 on: February 02, 2017, 09:42:23 PM »
Don't underestimate the placebo effect. Given the right
situation I could make even the most adamant skeptics
believe something that is not real. Feel it, see it, taste it,
hear it, smell it, and even detect it through a more neural
sense many refer to as our 6th.


That aside......


Tell me about your coil
Can you teach us how to make one?
 Pictures? Drawings? Instructions for us to follow in the
footsteps of your research?


Coils are kinda my thing, especially asymmetrical ones
that are not used or even talked about in conventional theory.


Such as the conical coil, the mathematics for which describe
asymmetrical electromagnetic fields of every possibility.
Including my favorite, the sine wave coil. Which is a coil that
Increases and decreases in diameter, according to a sine wave
Which is both resonant to the physical shape, but also the length
Of the wire as a whole.
This coil, when used at the resonant frequency, has a free energy
constant of: sqrt(3pi +R/v) or sqrt(3pi+(I), or change in I from 0-I.
Basically, an "ou inductor"
This is verified by multiple sources, but is not a part of mainstream
science, because the effect itself is in violation of the very laws we
use to observe the effect. Hence it is an anomaly.
Or a paradox, as some put it.   
You can't prove that it is overunity without negating your theory of
proof.
Basically, they are still 'looking' for the source of the energy.
And they won't find one because it is self inductive >1


What does self inductive mean?
That means that the rate of change in the current
(Yes change in current, not the value of the current itself)
Induces an electromotive force. In the form of e=-L(dI/dt)
When L>1; self inductance is overunity.





aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #43 on: February 03, 2017, 03:15:23 AM »
Tell me about your coil
Can you teach us how to make one?
 Pictures? Drawings? Instructions for us to follow in the
footsteps of your research?
Yes, absolutely.

I am reluctant to share too much of it here, especially the active images.  They are by email only.


But I am more willing to share the coil diagrams as they require some effort to actually appreciate.


I have attached one coil type, it involves making a coil of 7, 15 or 31 lengths (or actually any odd number you like, but those are good numbers, the more the stronger the output), with another right handed coil wound over it, in series.  It must be made just as shown.


It creates a beam out the end.

Quote
Coils are kinda my thing, especially asymmetrical ones
that are not used or even talked about in conventional theory.
I thought "funny, I don't remember writing that..."
So yes, I too am a fan of asymmetrical coils (and other asymmetries), they rectify aetheric energies.


When I created the first coil that created an energy I could feel, it needed connection to electrical power, while it would still output an energy for a few minutes it would fade.
But then when I made the coil asymmetric, I no longer needed an electrical input.
Quote
Such as the conical coil, the mathematics for which describe
asymmetrical electromagnetic fields of every possibility.
Including my favorite, the sine wave coil. Which is a coil that
Increases and decreases in diameter, according to a sine wave
Which is both resonant to the physical shape, but also the length
Of the wire as a whole.
This coil, when used at the resonant frequency, has a free energy
constant of: sqrt(3pi +R/v) or sqrt(3pi+(I), or change in I from 0-I.
Basically, an "ou inductor"
That goes over my head.  But I discovered an effect the other day where if a pattern (a helical loop will do) is made at one side and repeated at a smaller size, and if the energy is made to flow from the large to the small (which it might do automatically), then when the energy is moving through the small coil it outputs the same energy in a fraction of the space and time, which means the energy is compressed.


This happens to some extent in the coil in my image, to a greater extent in a conical coil, but it also happens in even a series of loops or coils that are not on the same axis, such as just putting some single turn loops spaced along a length of wire from large to small, not as good as the conical coil but the effect still occurs, it also can occur with a pancake coil or some other concentric coil form, or even with more elaborate repeated "fractal" shapes.
Quote
This is verified by multiple sources, but is not a part of mainstream
science, because the effect itself is in violation of the very laws we
use to observe the effect. Hence it is an anomaly.
Or a paradox, as some put it.   
You can't prove that it is overunity without negating your theory of
proof.
Basically, they are still 'looking' for the source of the energy.
And they won't find one because it is self inductive >1


What does self inductive mean?
That means that the rate of change in the current
(Yes change in current, not the value of the current itself)
Induces an electromotive force. In the form of e=-L(dI/dt)
When L>1; self inductance is overunity.
I know what self inductance it, math (algebra) is my weak point not electrical or conventional physics theory.


There is another coil I will mention, it involves simply butting 2 coils together, just wind some turn one way in a single layer, then reverse direction and wind the same number of turns the other.  This coils really needs to have the free ends shorted, unlike the one attached image which does better with jsut the bent ends shown.


This creates both a neutral zone (which is an area the aether moves well through) in the center, and I think what occurs is that the cancellation of the of the field near the center creates very non-linear fields and that is I think a large part of the effect.
The effect can be further increased by increasing the non-linearity by winding it into a barbell shape where the windings at each end are either multi layered or at least not spaced so much.


There are 2 other considerations, you can use copper wire or steel wire, I happen to have ample supply of insulated steel wire to experiment with.
Steel wire carries different energy ranges.  You can also mix them both for a beneficial effect.


Thinner wire creates a more intense faster energy, so favor thinner wire within reason.
Also smaller diameter coils work better, so the bucking coil above is best if wound over a toothpick or something small.


If you want to make bigger coils or use thicker wires there are answers but it requires either an extra coil, or electric or magnetic fields.


John






« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 08:37:35 AM by aether22 »

conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: Is anyone seriously interested in Free Energy Physics?
« Reply #44 on: February 03, 2017, 02:37:50 PM »
Today I very strongly believed in Aether22 and wound a coil according to his teachings. The longitudinal dimension of the four main turns is about 60 mm (or 2.4 inches). The thin wire used is insulated 0.5 mm2 copper wire (about AGW 20).

May be I will also try with very thin enameled copper wire, but this has to wait.

Mustering all my belief I could produce five times a strong beam which I managed to catch with my smart phone (see the attached photo). Then I was totally exhausted and had to rest a few hours. Be careful if you want to replicate such a coil, I warned you. It most likely will not work because your belief is faltering.

Greetings, Conrad
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 09:55:27 PM by conradelektro »