Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81960
  • *Latest: Stella

  • *Total Posts: 491771
  • *Total Topics: 14473
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 63
  • *Total: 65

Facebook

Author Topic: Some Ideas  (Read 1448 times)

Offline guest1289

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
Some Ideas
« on: November 24, 2016, 10:08:22 PM »
   Magnetic-Field Shielding

    For a long time people making the most basic design of  magnet-motors  claimed that if they found a suitable  magnetic-shielding  material,   then they could make a successful  magnet-motor.
    I'm sure that a  successful  magnetic-shielding  material would in fact be a 'permanent-magnet',  facing  N-N or S-S to the magnet that needs to be shielded
     (  in other words,  glued or attached,  directly to the  magnet that needs to be shielded ).
       And the magnet used as shielding.  could be of of different proportions, strength, and made of different materials,   to the  magnet  it would be shielding,  although if so,   it probably would not  provide a complete  100% shielding,   but it could be enough anyway. 

      Maybe some measurement tests could be carried out,  just in terms of general effectiveness,  rather than detailed tables of numerical results.
       Since it doesn't directly involve overunity,  you could even create a wikipedia-page about magnetic-shielding using  permanent-magnets,   to publish your results.

      I used to assume that this idea wouldn't work because I didn't see anyone( on the internet )  using it,  but now I wonder how many  'details-undisclosed' magnet-motors  of the past,  used it.
______

   The Most Basic Concepts For Solid-State-Overunity-Generators

      Electromagnets / Transformers

      An  electromagnet  is an example of overunity,   maybe yes ?,   but useless,  since you  'apparently'( photovoltaics, others ?) can't use a  non-moving  magnetic-field to induce any current.

       Apparently there was research  which found   that   'at a very specific frequency',  a core( iron-core? ) will emit a stronger  electromagnetic-field  than the  input power,  RESONANT-FREQUENCY-OF-CORE?/CIRCUIT?/AEATHER?
       (  I typed this before in a recent post,  maybe on another thread,  on this site,  and I had posted the  webpage-link  of where I read that,   however,   that webpage doesn't actually mention when or who did the research  )

       But some ideas on getting as much of the  overunity  generated from a core magnetized by a dc-pulsating-current.

        CONCEPT  -  COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS
        -  Say you have a  'primary-core/coil'  of x-diameter,  x-length,  x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?),    then maybe the   'secondary-core/coil'   which is used to generate the electricity,   should  have  THE-OPPOSITE-SPECIFICATIONS to the   'primary-core/coil',   1/2x-diameter, or,  2x-diameter,   1/2x-length, or,  2x-length,   1/2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?),  or 2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?)
             This seems to be purely logical,  since the  specifications that caused overunity in the 'primary-core/coil',  would possibly need to be reversed in the  'secondary-core/coil',  in order   to gain  100% of the overunity produced in the  'primary-core/coil'.
             (  I didn't also mention using opposite core-materials,  because I don't know enough in that area,  to know how that would work  )

   (   Also,  I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core,  instead of using two cores,   by having  the  'primary-coil-windings'  down one end of the core,  and the  'secondary-coil-windings'  down the other end of the same core,    while at the same time incorporating my idea above of  'COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS'  detailed above  )
______

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Some Ideas
« on: November 24, 2016, 10:08:22 PM »

Offline guest1289

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
Re: Some Ideas
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2016, 03:45:52 PM »
guest1289
Quote
      An  electromagnet  is an example of overunity,   maybe yes ?,   but useless,  since you  'apparently'( photovoltaics, others ?) can't use a  non-moving  magnetic-field to induce any current.

                  Obviously what I meant there,  is,   I was wondering if there's no method similar to photovoltaics to convert the  overunity-amount  of magnetic-field generated into electrical-current.
                   (  considering that sunlight has an approximate frequency  )

Quote
       Apparently there was research  which found   that   'at a very specific frequency',  a core( iron-core? ) will emit a stronger  electromagnetic-field  than the  input power,  RESONANT-FREQUENCY-OF-CORE?/CIRCUIT?/AEATHER?
       (  I typed this before in a recent post,  maybe on another thread,  on this site,  and I had posted the  webpage-link  of where I read that,   however,   that webpage doesn't actually mention when or who did the research  )

          Obviously this is different to an  electromagnet  in that a pulsating-current was used,  which allowed them to measure the claimed overunity.
_________   

        Is anyone looking for an  overunity-generator  to replicate,  one that may not be too difficult.
           The  pictures in the post below were posted a few months ago .

http://overunity.com/16767/an-electric-motor-turning-an-electric-generator-which-powers-the-same-motor/msg489452/#msg489452

        If it is overunity, that is a high achievement,  but from news in the last year or so,  I assume it is not the only  successful   overunity-generator,  otherwise I would be more amazed  (  although the device is all AC current,  which may make measurments more difficult,  thinking in AC is too difficult for me  )

        I mention this one because I wonder if it could be converted to a  completely-solid-state-generator  ,    by,   replacing  the oscillating  magnet/magnets  with   1-core?/2-cores?,   specifically the 2 concepts I posted in my previous post above ,  maybe the 2nd concept :

Quote
        CONCEPT  -  COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS
        -  Say you have a  'primary-core/coil'  of x-diameter,  x-length,  x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?),    then maybe the   'secondary-core/coil'   which is used to generate the electricity,   should  have  THE-OPPOSITE-SPECIFICATIONS to the   'primary-core/coil',   1/2x-diameter, or,  2x-diameter,   1/2x-length, or,  2x-length,   1/2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?),  or 2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?)
             This seems to be purely logical,  since the  specifications that caused overunity in the 'primary-core/coil',  would possibly need to be reversed in the  'secondary-core/coil',  in order   to gain  100% of the overunity produced in the  'primary-core/coil'.
             (  I didn't also mention using opposite core-materials,  because I don't know enough in that area,  to know how that would work  )
     

Quote
   (   Also,  I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core,  instead of using two cores,   by having  the  'primary-coil-windings'  down one end of the core,  and the  'secondary-coil-windings'  down the other end of the same core,    while at the same time incorporating my idea above of  'COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS'  detailed above  )
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2125
Re: Some Ideas
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2016, 05:25:53 PM »
(iron)core to metglas(s) to magnetic graphit/graphene: dielectric catastrophe to thermal shock
                                                (process for superconductive materials)
                                                 elementary Eigen-Spin administration


Searching and founds for the   An international "1 Watt for 1 Cent" generator challenge !  ;)

Offline guest1289

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • The download link for the document containing my 'Inventions and Designs'
Re: Some Ideas
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2016, 08:18:18 PM »
guest1289
Quote
        CONCEPT  -  COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS
        -  Say you have a  'primary-core/coil'  of x-diameter,  x-length,  x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?),    then maybe the   'secondary-core/coil'   which is used to generate the electricity,   should  have  THE-OPPOSITE-SPECIFICATIONS to the   'primary-core/coil',   1/2x-diameter, or,  2x-diameter,   1/2x-length, or,  2x-length,   1/2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?),  or 2x-number of coil-windings( or, spacings ?)
             This seems to be purely logical,  since the  specifications that caused overunity in the 'primary-core/coil',  would possibly need to be reversed in the  'secondary-core/coil',  in order   to gain  100% of the overunity produced in the  'primary-core/coil'.
             (  I didn't also mention using opposite core-materials,  because I don't know enough in that area,  to know how that would work  )

      So,  that concept is to have the  secondary-core  be the  inverse-specifications   of the  primary-core .

Quote
   (   Also,  I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core,  instead of using two cores,   by having  the  'primary-coil-windings'  down one end of the core,  and the  'secondary-coil-windings'  down the other end of the same core,    while at the same time incorporating my idea above of  'COMPLETELY OPPOSITE SPECIFICATIONS OF CORES/COILS'  detailed above  )

     In regard to that last paragraph I'm quoting from myself :

        "I was wondering if you can do it all on just one core" 

       I  was also thinking about   a  Cone-Shaped-Core( with a  primary-coil,  and a secondary-coil on it  )  in regard to doing it all on one core.
       (  I read a post on this site in the recent 2 or 3 months by someone else where they mentioned  a   cone-shaped-coil( I did not see that it used a core, so I'm not sure if it used a core ),   although I didn't read the details about that one or how it was used  ,   but I had already thought of a  cone-shaped-core/coils  before reading that post  )
 


 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: