Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81888
  • *Latest: WilliamH

  • *Total Posts: 489740
  • *Total Topics: 14415
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 296
  • *Total: 300

Facebook

Author Topic: TD replications  (Read 36122 times)

Offline gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2829
Re: TD replications
« Reply #180 on: March 04, 2017, 01:29:58 AM »
Here is the device assembled


Link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsEbX8yJ91I


I'll need to bolt this down for testing :o


Luc

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: TD replications
« Reply #180 on: March 04, 2017, 01:29:58 AM »

Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: TD replications
« Reply #181 on: March 04, 2017, 05:52:22 AM »
@All  readers

The below png file contains the results of  a
quasi replication of GotoLuc's MagTorqAmp

    (output only)

             best wishes
                   floor

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: TD replications
« Reply #182 on: March 04, 2017, 06:09:35 AM »
@GotoLuc
   
     Awsome !

    floor

Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: TD replications
« Reply #183 on: March 04, 2017, 06:15:37 AM »
@Nonlinear

           If you have the time, I would like to
talk over / better understand your suggested
approach.  Maybe in the topic

http://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/

       regards
           floor


Offline Cairun

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: TD replications
« Reply #184 on: March 04, 2017, 10:17:40 AM »
@Luc,


Your latest build looks awesome.

Regards,
Alex

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: TD replications
« Reply #184 on: March 04, 2017, 10:17:40 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline shylo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 459
Re: TD replications
« Reply #185 on: March 04, 2017, 01:19:41 PM »
Luc Nice build , and thanks for showing the break down and explaining the poles positions.
artv

Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: TD replications
« Reply #186 on: March 04, 2017, 03:22:04 PM »

All right, so... useing A Cairon design-roary-stop-start input...this could get even more interesting.

@ GotoLuc

Important note

Now that you are using larger magnets, the forces involved may be great enough
that a personal injury could be serious !  Please consider designing and installing
some fool proof safety / locking mechanisms on your new device.

Safety first .... then have as much fun as humanly possible !
...............................................................................................

It looks like you may need lateral support / rollers like that which you were considering
in the bicycle rim device ?

very nice build.

                regards
                     floor

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: TD replications
« Reply #186 on: March 04, 2017, 03:22:04 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2829
Re: TD replications
« Reply #187 on: March 04, 2017, 07:11:57 PM »
Thanks Luc for the video, now your results make more sense.
There are several mistakes in your approach and measurements, which may be very well the cause for the detection of COP>1. The biggest mistake is to judge the efficiency of a device based on average forces. That is completely unscientific, and it can very easily mislead you. The total work must be measured and calculated, like in my spreadsheet.

The second mistake is ignoring the role of measurement errors. A measurement is never 100% accurate, there is always some error in it. The experimenter must be aware of the expected maximum error margin of his measurements, and disclose it together with the measurement results. Without this, the data can not be taken seriously. For example the best resolution of your scale is 5g which is extremely low and produces a very large error if you are measuring forces in the range of 0 to 100g. When you are measuring 100g then the uncertainty of the measured result is 10g, which is 10%. The correct way of showing your measurement result is: 100g +-5g, or with other words, the real force could be anything from 100-5=95g to 100+5=105g, the error margin is 105-95=10g, which is 10% of the measured value of 100g. Therefore if you find a COP=1.1 with such large error margin of measurement, then your measurements are pretty much useless to prove anything. If you are measuring even less than 100g, like in some of your measurement series measuring 5, 10, 20g etc. then your error margin is so huge that the data is of no value to prove anything. If your scale has a low resolution, then build a device that requires the measurement of about 100 times larger forces than the 5g resolution. If this is not practical, then use a scale that has got sufficient resolution and accuracy to produce around 1% (or less) measurement error.

The third mistake is not to measure the complete cycle of movement. For example webby1 was trying to convince you few pages back that you have to measure the 4th part of the cycle as well, in one of your earlier devices. He finally succeeded in this effort in post:
http://overunity.com/16987/td-replications/msg496971/#msg496971 and you provided the data in:
http://overunity.com/16987/td-replications/msg496974/#msg496974
After you have measured this 4th part of the cycle and taken it into account, then your (still incorrect) averaging calculations showed only 10% of excess work, which can very easily attributed to the other mistakes already mentioned.

In this case of rotary device this is not as critical as in the previous devices, but I would still recommend you to measure the complete cycle. Meaning, two rotary magnets pass in sequence above the slider. Please also measure the output force as well at least 10 times, like after each 1mm movement.

I was trying to get a manual feel of the forces in your device using two neodymium magnets of 4x2x1cm, which I don’t recommend to anyone. These magnets are just too powerful, and if one doesn’t have very strong fingers, they can also harm you! But, I have got no ceramic magnets of rectangular shape right now, so can not do the safe version.

Anyway, keep up the good work, and if the COP is still higher than say 1.2 even after fixing these mistakes, then it should be possible to build at least a perpetuum mobile using this magnet arrangement. If the COP would be really 1.6 like in your measurements, then the machine should be able to generate useful output power as well, besides just running itself.

Thanks Floor for the links and the drawing.


Hi Nonlinear

Thanks for your post.

I've been aware of the scales 5 gram resolution limitation and agree it's not ideal for small measurements.
The errors % margin will be greatly reduced with the version 2 build as the scale will be in the Kg measurement ranges.

Lets see what these new numbers will show.

Regards

Luc

Offline Nonlinear

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: TD replications
« Reply #188 on: March 04, 2017, 09:31:03 PM »
If you have the time, I would like to talk over / better understand your suggested approach.  Maybe in the topic
http://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/

I don't think it is a good idea to separate the discussion of measurement techniques from the experimental thread (here) where the action happens. There is a good chance that those who experiment and supposed to read and implement the suggestions will not find them. Like in this post:
http://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/msg499599/#msg499599
telecom has explained how to measure and correctly calculate the input and output work already on the 9th February. His suggestion was ignored and the averaging continued as if nothing happened. If you ignore good advice then why would anyone be willing to help?

Anyway, if you don't' understand telecom's explanation, then I can explain it again. What is it that you don't understand?

Offline gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2829
Re: TD replications
« Reply #189 on: March 04, 2017, 10:54:03 PM »

I would tend to agree with you Nonlinear. Better keep the measurement techniques of a replication in this topic.


Now, concerning telecom's advice "below"


"Re Gotoluc measurements:
work = force x distance
I would like  Gotoluc to measure force for each segment of his input
and output dials, and multiply this force by the length of the segment.
Then add them together for the input and output.
This will give us input and output work.
The more segments he has, the more precise would be the calculations.
In fact, he already has everything in place, just needs to do the above
operations."


I do remember reading it and re-read but can't seem to understand or find what I have not provided.
So I guess you'll have to explain what I have not done.
BTW, your calculations came to the same as I had calculated, so again I fail to see what I forgot.

Kind regards

Luc

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: TD replications
« Reply #189 on: March 04, 2017, 10:54:03 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: TD replications
« Reply #190 on: March 05, 2017, 02:25:27 AM »
@Nonlinear

A request of / upon Telecom by floor
@
http://overunity.com/16987/td-replications/msg499531/#msg499531 

Telecom's rseponce next day
@
http://overunity.com/16954/magnets-motion-and-measurement/msg499599/#msg499599


Have I given a correct interpretation of the basics of the process for calculating the
work in these magnet interactions here ........
           
     @       http://overunity.com/14311/work-from-2-magnets-19-output-2/msg498005/#msg498005        ?

  If so, and with your permission :)  ..... then I will re post those three pages / files here ?


A COP of 161.2838 .... does this mean basically the same thing as 61.2838 % more out
than in ?


             thanks
                 floor

Offline verpies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3402
Re: TD replications
« Reply #191 on: March 05, 2017, 12:31:39 PM »
I do remember reading it and re-read but can't seem to understand or find what I have not provided.
I just popped in here without reading the entire thread.

Please give me some links to your work, in which you had summed the force*distance for the input and output of your system, so I can evaluate it.
If I notice anything you have omitted or any errors, I'll let you know.


Offline gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2829
Re: TD replications
« Reply #192 on: March 05, 2017, 03:50:13 PM »

I just popped in here without reading the entire thread.

Please give me some links to your work, in which you had summed the force*distance for the input and output of your system, so I can evaluate it.
If I notice anything you have omitted or any errors, I'll let you know.

Hi verpies,

Nice to see you here.

The below videos (in order) relate to the around 60% over unity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUlDMY1iE5A

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpBaeJD38HI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6sbIgr2L8A


And the below videos are v 2.0 which is a Super build of the above
Just completed the build on Friday so no measurements yet.
I'll have to bolt down this beast to measure her ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMVES42VbzA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsEbX8yJ91I

Regards

Luc

Offline dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 951
Re: TD replications
« Reply #193 on: March 05, 2017, 07:31:43 PM »
Nice build. Reminds me a bit of Teslas Earthquake machine tho ^^ Make sure to have a sledge hammer at hand during the test run, in case of any runaway /evac situation.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: TD replications
« Reply #194 on: March 05, 2017, 08:27:47 PM »
@ Nonlinear

Here in PDF (easy to down load / contemplate off line) form is
my responce to your postings. 

Please find the attached file  "MagnetForceIntegration.PDF"

       Thanks for your input
                       best wishes
                                floor

@ all readers
The above PDF file is not a private message.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: TD replications
« Reply #194 on: March 05, 2017, 08:27:47 PM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: