Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81962
  • *Latest: kobus

  • *Total Posts: 491894
  • *Total Topics: 14476
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 156
  • *Total: 161

Facebook

Author Topic: Why Over-Unity is Possible  (Read 8935 times)

Offline pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #30 on: November 22, 2016, 11:35:03 PM »
Well said, Paul.Energy is conservative, but WORK is not...
Now start to think about how this can be used.


That in itself is a good question. Technically, no energy should be able to be drawn out of any situation in equilibrium. In the magnet example, energy is coming from somewhere (probably directly from space/time) to both create and maintain the field (potential), and do any work. 


I have seen many ideas on a magnet motor, but most strike me as improbable in their function. To extract energy from any system, either energy must be inserted artificially to overcome negative forces and/or system losses, the energy can be directly converted to a useful form, or it has to have an inherent or artificial energy imbalance within the system that can be exploited.


If these energy principles were either easy or obvious, we would have had solar cells and generators in the 1500's, LOL.


Most of the principles we accept as common today were discovered fairly recently in history, yet they were evident all throughout human history. We need to re-examine our base knowledge looking for anomalous discrepancies that don't quite fit the model to find the simple stuff that is still hiding in front of our faces.


With magnetic fields, I think we are looking at usable power at far too low of potential to be utilized. An example would be a direct conversion that might yield say P=I/V of 1Watt =  .0001V X 10000A -- in such a situation, what could you realistically do with it unless you could artificially raise the potential energy slope to a realistic level to work with our systems???


This is the question I have been asking myself for a long time as I have seen hints of just such things in many of the electrical systems I have played with over the years.


Every possible system I have examined that seems to have available energy gives off that energy at potentials either far too low or far to high for any practical purpose using today's technology. Basically, it is like discovering fission in the 1500's. That is where amateur experimenters and forums like this might just work. Most of the people building and replicating do not have a clue what can't work, so they try it anyway. Sooner or later accidents are bound to happen.


However, when they do expect complete BS explanations for WHY they work. (Listen to Hutchinson as a 'for example'.) Everyone is pressured to give explanation for something they themselves truly do not understand, so it is no surprise why fairytales often make more sense than the given explanations.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #30 on: November 22, 2016, 11:35:03 PM »

Offline allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1320
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #31 on: November 23, 2016, 12:42:38 AM »
@Paul
Quote
The sticky tape analogy is extremely loose, basically another illusion. Similarity in behavior does not yield equivalence unless all of the factors are equally equivalent. What we have with a magnet vs the tape is that the tape mechanically bonds the mass to another mass, making the two into one as far as gravity is concerned. With the magnet, it is falling, but being pulled in the opposite direction at an equal or greater rate by a different force.

In a sense it is all an illusion because if we were in outer space we could see one magnet rise to the ceiling as another magnet falls to the ceiling on the opposite side of the Earth. In effect we have forces causing accelerations with little insight to what or why the force is.

Quote
The problem I have with the definition of work is that it actually allows violation of the conservation principle due to an old, outmoded notion of the concept we call work. Any system which does not move an object, but necessarily expends energy is a violation of the conservation principle. Due to the work definition, since no mass was moved spatially, no work is done. However, energy is the capability of doing work. Energy as a term can be looked at as potential or kinetic. Stored energy (no work) is potential, expended energy is kinetic. No work being done requires conservation of the energy in the system. Therefore we end up with a paradox due to definition. The magnet scenario has to expend energy to overcome a force, therefore energy is being used. If no work is being performed, then no questions have been answered, only new ones raised.

I would agree it is a quagmire of contradictions and the newest contradictions relate to nano-technology or engineered materials. One scientist built a wall in which water drops are always forced to travel upwards against the force of gravity. Another built a material which is invisible to certain spectrums of electromagnetic waves. In time they will produce Maxwell's Demon where meta-materials cherry pick high energy particles or EM waves from ambient conditions to generate power. At which point we may understand it is not the energy of a system or the supposed work performed per say but the selectivity or characteristics of the process. If we allow only high energy particles to pass a boundary and exclude low energy ones then the particles themselves have performed work due to their nature not the process.

We can produce this kind of selectivity on the macro scale it's just a matter of understanding what is actually happening and why then making the choice as to how we want to control the process. Knowledge and control is power...literally.

AC

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #32 on: November 23, 2016, 07:12:57 AM »
It is very very simple. take a coil, power with dc, measure field.Take a ferromagnetic core insert into and measure field. You have found OU.

Offline Zephir

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
    • Reddit about Aether Wave Theory
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #33 on: November 23, 2016, 07:24:55 AM »
"Everything Should Be Made as Simple as Possible, But Not Simpler". Albert Einstein in a letter to  Jost Winteler (1901)

It's generally accepted (1, 2, 3) that the overunity results during demagnetization of ferromagnetic materials with hysteresis curve under negative slope conditions (magnetic viscosity leading to oversaturation). So you cannot observe the overunity in steady state DC conditions.


Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #34 on: November 23, 2016, 09:01:40 PM »
"Everything Should Be Made as Simple as Possible, But Not Simpler". Albert Einstein in a letter to  Jost Winteler (1901)

It's generally accepted (1, 2, 3) that the overunity results during demagnetization of ferromagnetic materials with hysteresis curve under negative slope conditions (magnetic viscosity leading to oversaturation). So you cannot observe the overunity in steady state DC conditions.

You are wrong. The same energy used but results are different. Analyze again.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #34 on: November 23, 2016, 09:01:40 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Zephir

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
    • Reddit about Aether Wave Theory
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #35 on: November 23, 2016, 09:14:41 PM »
/* take a coil, power with dc, measure field. Take a ferromagnetic core insert into and measure field. You have found OU. */

Nope, the field will be stronger, but it will not release additional energy, repeatedly the less. For example, when you connect two magnets, the field will be also stronger and even some energy will be released - but still with no overunity. For restoring of the original state the same amount energy must be exerted.

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #36 on: November 23, 2016, 10:12:13 PM »
/* take a coil, power with dc, measure field. Take a ferromagnetic core insert into and measure field. You have found OU. */

Nope, the field will be stronger, but it will not release additional energy, repeatedly the less. For example, when you connect two magnets, the field will be also stronger and even some energy will be released - but still with no overunity. For restoring of the original state the same amount energy must be exerted.


Ha ha ha ...you are troll paid by those bastards who pollute Earth. The stronger field the stronger current produced by induction.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #36 on: November 23, 2016, 10:12:13 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #37 on: November 23, 2016, 10:15:27 PM »
Do you know why it took so long to understand simple scientific fact ????    McFarland Cook, Figuera,Buforn,Hubbard,Hendershot, Perrigo,Amman,Tesla,Cohler,Steven Mark - who do you believe ?

Offline memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #38 on: November 23, 2016, 10:38:29 PM »
"Ha ha ha ...you are troll paid by those bastards who pollute Earth. The stronger field the stronger current produced by induction."
yes, but the elctrical energy generated does not come from the field but from the mechanism that moves the field wrt the conductor.
For actual examples as to get free work, see Dr. Daniel Sheehan's work on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBp_SPJAOJc

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #39 on: November 23, 2016, 10:52:03 PM »
"Ha ha ha ...you are troll paid by those bastards who pollute Earth. The stronger field the stronger current produced by induction."
yes, but the elctrical energy generated does not come from the field but from the mechanism that moves the field wrt the conductor.
For actual examples as to get free work, see Dr. Daniel Sheehan's work on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBp_SPJAOJc

 ::) "Remember to always think twice"  Energy comes from field! only the apparatus is wrong. I posted those who should have been listened. They had proper arrangement. People do not poop up for centuries with the same and the same without reason.... That is why it was overlooked - magnetic field is the source of energy, but the way we are tapping it is useless

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #39 on: November 23, 2016, 10:52:03 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #40 on: November 23, 2016, 10:53:04 PM »
Magnetic field is the dipole is the broken symmetry !

Offline memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #41 on: November 24, 2016, 12:34:38 AM »
Magnetic field is NOT the source of generated energy. Magnetism is the equivalent of a catalyst in chemistry.


Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #42 on: November 24, 2016, 08:11:17 AM »
Magnetic field is NOT the source of generated energy. Magnetism is the equivalent of a catalyst in chemistry.

Think twice how is the current generated by induction and you will be struck by this simple fact.

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3557
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #43 on: November 24, 2016, 08:13:07 AM »
You talk like a child who was said how the car is moving... you know...car is doing brum bruuum bruuummm and it's moving

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Turbo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
    • Youtube
Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #44 on: November 24, 2016, 08:40:58 AM »
Magnetic field is NOT the source of generated energy. Magnetism is the equivalent of a catalyst in chemistry.

This is correct and it is one of the best posts i have seen this year.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Why Over-Unity is Possible
« Reply #44 on: November 24, 2016, 08:40:58 AM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: