Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81959
  • *Latest: Kapalek

  • *Total Posts: 491753
  • *Total Topics: 14473
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 88
  • *Total: 93

Facebook

Author Topic: Have overunity . . . need help  (Read 4968 times)

Offline Tim Beane

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2016, 06:53:33 PM »
If you do not claim it as a perpetual device but as an enhancement to efficiency,, then things are not so hard.

It might take a court battle just to get it considered if you claim it as perpetual.

Another trick is to claim it as a toy,, just sayin'  :)

Yes, that approach has been discussed with my patent counsel.  We have opted to hit it head on.  Although it is not being titled as a perpetual device, its theory of operation identifies it as requiring no input to start, or sustain its operation.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2016, 06:53:33 PM »

Offline Tim Beane

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2016, 07:16:09 PM »
You needed help. If none can see your design, you can not expect to get any help.
A patent will also require a working prototype - which you don't have.
What kind of help do you need?
If you ask for help, and don't want our help, this thread is a waste of time ;-)


Once again I will clarify my question and needs, which were clearly outlined in my original post.  Yes, I needed help . . . specifically I need an individual who has a significant background in physics to discuss my invention with.  I did not ask for anyone to justify, verify or debunk my invention.  Do you know of anyone who has such a background?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2016, 07:23:34 PM »
I repeat: many people have such knowledge (including myself).
The inevitable result will be that your idea will be debunked; speaking from experience, that result probably be ignored or even resented.

Offline Tim Beane

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2016, 07:46:08 PM »
I repeat: many people have such knowledge (including myself).
The inevitable result will be that your idea will be debunked; speaking from experience, that result probably be ignored or even resented.

I am not looking to debate or put anyone down.  I am far past debunking.  I am working on patents.   I have a specific need and maybe you can help.  I have received private messages and probably need to clarify a bit more . . . I need an individual with a deep education in physics to help me.  Do you have a masters degree in physics?


Offline conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2016, 07:51:47 PM »
A person who does not want to tell whether he has a working prototype or not is best ignored.

This person does not look for an expert, he wants attention. Do not give him attention till he stops his double-talk.

I am sure that high school level of physics would be enough to teach him reality.

A patent can not protect a scientific discovery. His "patent expert" should know that. Therefore I know that we have once more a disturbed individual.

Any person with a deep education in physics will know and claim that OU is not possible. So, you have to show a working OU machine, nothing more and nothingl less. Words and theories might come after that.

Greetings, Conrad

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2016, 07:51:47 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Low-Q

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2531
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #20 on: October 13, 2016, 08:05:06 PM »
Once again I will clarify my question and needs, which were clearly outlined in my original post.  Yes, I needed help . . . specifically I need an individual who has a significant background in physics to discuss my invention with.  I did not ask for anyone to justify, verify or debunk my invention.  Do you know of anyone who has such a background?
Well, if you are looking for a person who can discuss design with you, and someone who has proper knowledge in physics, and you post it here, and say no thanks to the ones here who want to discuss this with you, you should rather ask Michio Kaku. He is not a member here, and he is an expert in physics.
You say you got over unity, so I really do not think you need to discuss this with anyone, because you have already figured it out, but can't explain it using common laws of thermodynamics. So you need help to find a way to use laws of thermodynamics to explain your over unity. How can that be possible?
That said, I do have proper knowledge in physics, like many here. However, there are plenty of members of this forum that is more dreamers than doers. Persons who claim over unity based on a drawing and lack of practical experience. Persons who gets angry when their design is debunked. Persons who cannot swallow some pride, and go on with the next project, or make it simpler by harnessing the free energy we get from the sun.


Are you such a dreamer, I do not know if this probable discussion will lead to anything but arguing ;)
Are you willing to offer some pride, and axcept that people does not agree with you, you are welcome to discuss this with me and other members who has proper experience in physics.


Vidar

Offline Tim Beane

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2016, 08:06:27 PM »
A person who does not want to tell whether he has a working prototype or not is best ignored.

This person does not look for an expert, he wants attention. Do not give him attention till he stops his double-talk.

I am sure that high school level of physics would be enough to teach him reality.

Grsetings, Conrad

I did not come here pounding my chest nor have I insulted anyone.  I gave ample description to accomplish what I need. I have met with a published physics professor, but he could not give me what I need for the patent application, which is why I am here.  I was hoping to find someone who could bridge the gap for me. 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2016, 08:06:27 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #22 on: October 13, 2016, 08:14:17 PM »
I did not come here pounding my chest nor have I insulted anyone.

To claim OU without proof is an insult. It insults every intelligent individual.

Greetings, Conrad

Offline memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2016, 08:19:06 PM »
No degree actually proves understanding. I have no degrees but have corrected many people with degrees on basics (math and physics). What makes you think that conservation of energy is not violated by your idea?

Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #24 on: October 13, 2016, 08:21:38 PM »
The world is dying and you are pattenting an O.U. device ? 

Are you planning to vote for Donald Rump as well ?

            floor

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #24 on: October 13, 2016, 08:21:38 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline webby1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3016
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2016, 08:35:27 PM »
Yes, that approach has been discussed with my patent counsel.  We have opted to hit it head on.  Although it is not being titled as a perpetual device, its theory of operation identifies it as requiring no input to start, or sustain its operation.

Hi Tim,

First:  There is no such thing as Over Unity.

Second:  When what you have is properly described then what you will have is a "new" energy source manifested by your method of utilization.

On with the proper description.

When you describe the device it has a construction cost, this cost preloads your system with "energy" to place it into the world if nothing else.  Cost does not infer monetary expenditure but the physical manifestation of the parts in there correct positions and all that.

Within that description you will include where the energy is, where it goes and how it interacts.  Can you already identify this path?

When this path is identified and described in relation to your device it will be seen as a novel construction and no need to have any label applied other than "a source of (_________)", fill in the blank with what it provides.

After having worked with a few specialized professionals in the patent arena I would be surprised that they did not point you into this direction.

Good luck with your endeavor,, I am not a trained Physics person so I can not offer any help.

Offline conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2016, 08:44:17 PM »
https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2016/e/ar52.html

Artcle 52 (2)(a)
1)
European patents shall be granted for any inventions, in all fields of technology, provided that they are new, involve an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial application.
(2)
The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions within the meaning of paragraph 1:
(a)
discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods;

Any OU device will have to be based on a new discovery, a physical law or fact not yet known. And a discovery can not be patented. (Because the discovered law or fact was always there ready to be observed.)

One might patent a specific machine based on this discovery. But many people will be able to build different and better machines based on the same discovery and will patent it as well.

Why do you think there are millons of patents and almost every patent is worth less?

Greetings, Conrad


Offline Tim Beane

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Have overunity . . . need help
« Reply #27 on: October 14, 2016, 02:49:40 PM »
Well, if you are looking for a person who can discuss design with you, and someone who has proper knowledge in physics, and you post it here, and say no thanks to the ones here who want to discuss this with you, you should rather ask Michio Kaku. He is not a member here, and he is an expert in physics.


Thank you.  I am working on contacting him.  I've also received a couple private messages from individuals who fit my needs.

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: