Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

movieclipsfree

movie clips free

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 482703
  • *Total Topics: 14228
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 10
  • *Guests: 190
  • *Total: 200

Facebook

Author Topic: THE INFINITE ARRAY ENERGY GENERATOR PART II  (Read 2816 times)

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1927
Re: THE INFINITE ARRAY ENERGY GENERATOR PART II
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2016, 06:55:17 PM »
                                        static magnetic amplifier : C.O.P. ?
                                       
                                     C.O.P.:    Wout/Win

                                       using amorph metal parts

                                    page 12 from original document
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?CC=WO&NR=2015090266A2&KC=A2&FT=D&ND=3&date=20150625&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP

                              Wout               Win


                                280                7,62
                                535              14,97
                                850              24,13
                              1240              35,82             [ values explained in (0028) and (0029)]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         C.O.P. Henri Trilles power amplifier
                                   
                                 Wout              Win
                                           1 x system
                                     first transformer stage
                                   84                2,15                                 ~ average Imris generator C.O.P.
                                   second transformer stage
                                  224               84( output first stage)
                                   third  transformer stage
                                  634              224 (output second stage)
« Last Edit: September 06, 2016, 01:01:01 AM by lancaIV »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: THE INFINITE ARRAY ENERGY GENERATOR PART II
« Reply #15 on: September 05, 2016, 06:55:17 PM »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1927
Re: THE INFINITE ARRAY ENERGY GENERATOR PART II
« Reply #16 on: September 06, 2016, 11:01:24 AM »
https://books.google.pt/books?id=KhUWDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=figuera+buforn&source=bl&ots=rGYZDkMLRm&sig=WoKiQRSC1IevC84s9GZ1WUxt6pU&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjD4ITipPjOAhWbF8AKHcXjBP0Q6AEITDAF#v=onepage&q=figuera%20buforn&f=false


from the original Figuera/Buforn drawings
to toroidal transformer modification
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QguCN8TP7o


the #14 list with the descriptions gives us mathematical formulas and physical reasons about the system working principle.

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=FR&NR=2312135A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19761217&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP
google description translated:

 https://translate.google.de/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fworldwide.espacenet.com%2FpublicationDetails%2Fdescription%3FCC%3DFR%26NR%3D2312135A1%26KC%3DA1%26FT%3DD%26ND%3D3%26date%3D19761217%26DB%3DEPODOC%26locale%3Den_EP&edit-text=


One of the Figuera important arguments for motionless generator work : the magnetic field force and the attraction poles distance.


https://www.google.com/patents/US4345174
It is first to be noted that the pull of an electromagnet varies as a function of the area of the holding surface muliplied by the square of the flux density divided by a constant. Also, that the flux density increases as the distance to the holding surface decreases. Hence, changes in the flux density is the greatest contributor to the pulling force of an electromagnet. Experiments conducted by the inventor have shown that an electromagnet powered by two "D" cell batteries can produce a holding force of 500 pounds and that the magnetic attraction force varies with the distance between the surface of the electromagnet and the item to be lifted. It was found, that at a distance of one-eighth of an inch, the force is approximately 7.8 pounds; at a distance of approximately one-twelfth of an inch the force is 31 pounds; at a distance of approximately one/twenty-fourth of an inch the force is 125 pounds; and, as stated, at contact, the force is 500 pounds. Thus, a usable force begins when the distance is one-eighth of an inch and increases rapidly thereafter.

1. Juni 1981 :    2x "D"-cell      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_battery
                         ea. nominal voltage 1,5V 8000 mAh

                                      higher voltage,pulsed power !
                                                               
                                          permanet magnet as battery and Tesla quoting:
"One watt-second of power is not much. As normally thought of, it is just one watt delivered over a period of one second. Oh what a vast difference however, can be the manifestation of one billion watts delivered for one billionth of a second."

1 signal per sec ,2 signals per sec= 1 Hz to 1000Hz/1 KHz to 1000000Hz/1 MHz to
1000000000Hz/1GHZ ( .... THz/ PHz)
                                                    50Hz ~ 3000 RPM

                              accumulated charge( flywheel/capacitor) to 1 stroke/strike
                             https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse
                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)
http://overunity.com/13619/longitudinal-magneto-dielectric-waves-vs-electromagnetic-waves/#.V87jsFpX9aY

and recitating from Galey power amplifier  description:
Pour chaque dispositif d'une puissance de 2 kW en courant alternatif 220 volts,50 hertz par exemple,utilisant des aimants ferrites courants,il faudrait environ 75 grammes d'aimant.

google translator:
for each of a 2 kW AC 220 volt, 50 Hz for example, using magnets ferrites currents (courants~gelaeufig~conventional,not currents)would require about 75 grams of magnet.                   


     = C5/C8 Ferrit(e) magnets          http://www.ferrite-info.com/ferrite_grades.aspx

                                                                                    75 grams~ 2,5 ounces 
         
1.95 Ounces    Your Price: $0.35   http://www.magnet4sale.com/ceramic-magnets-c8-1-7-8x7-8x3-8-hard-ferrite-magnets/
« Last Edit: September 06, 2016, 05:46:19 PM by lancaIV »


Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1927
Re: THE INFINITE ARRAY ENERGY GENERATOR PART II
« Reply #17 on: September 06, 2016, 01:42:17 PM »
Figuera/Buforn: 1902-1914


Tesla : 1892 http://www.pbs.org/tesla/res/res_art05.html
Usually in operating an induction foil we have set up a vibration of moderate frequency in the primary, either by means of an interrupter or break, or by the use of an alternator. Earlier English investigators, to mention only Spottiswoode and J. E. H. Gordon, have used a rapid break in connection with the coil. Our knowledge and experience of to-day enables us to see clearly why these coils under the conditions of the tests did not disclose any remarkable phenomena, and why able experimenters failed to perceive many of the curious effects which have since been observed.

In the experiments such as performed this evening, we operate the coil either from a specially constructed alternator capable of giving many thousands of reversals of current per second, or, by disruptively discharging a condenser through the primary, we set up a vibration in the secondary circuit of a frequency of many hundred thousand or millions per second, if we so desire; and in using either of these means we enter a field as yet unexplored.
It is impossible to pursue an investigation in any novel line without finally making some interesting observation or learning some useful fact. That this statement is applicable to the subject of this lecture the many curious and unexpected phenomena which we observe afford a convincing proof. By way of illustration, take for instance the most obvious phenomena, those of the discharge of the induction coil.


A most curious feature of alternate currents of high frequencies and potentials is that they enable us to perform many experiments by the use of one wire only. In many respects this feature is of great interest.[/size]
In a type of alternate current motor invented by me some years ago I produced rotation by inducing, by means of a single alternating current passed through a motor circuit, in the mass or other circuits of the motor, secondary currents, which, jointly with the primary or inducing current, created n moving field of force. A simple but crude form of such a motor is obtained by winding upon an iron core a primary, and close to it a secondary coil, joining the ends of the latter and placing a freely movable metal disc within the influence of the field produced by both. The iron core is employed for obvious reasons, but it is not essential to the operation. To improve the motor, the iron core is made to encircle the armature. Again to improve, the secondary coil is made to overlap partly the primary, so that it cannot free itself from a strong inductive action of thc latter, repel its lines as it may. Once more to improve, the proper difference of phase is obtained between the primary and secondary currents by a condenser, self-induction, resistance or equivalent windings.[/size]
I had discovered, however, that rotation is produced by means of a single coil and cote; my explanation of the phenomenon, and leading thought in trying the experiment, being that there must be a true time lag in the magnetization of the core. I remember the pleasure I had when, in the writings of Professor Ayrton, which came later to my hand, I found the idea of the time lag advocated. Whether there is a true time lag, whether the retardation is due to eddy currents circulating in minute paths, must remain an open question, but the fact is that a coil wound upon an iron core and traversed by an alternating current creates a moving field of force, capable of setting an armature: in rotation- It is of some interest, in conjunction with the historical Arago experiment, to mention that in lag or phase motors I have produced rotation in the opposite direction to the moving field, which means that in that experiment the magnet may not rotate, or may even rotate in the opposite direction to the moving disc. Here, then, is a motor (diagrammatically illustrated in Fig. 17), comprising a coil and iron core, and a freely movable copper disc in proximity to the latter.


and so on


going timely to 1902/1914 Figuera/Buforn and the publicated "20 hp electric motor" power range          electric motor efficiency 1902 ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_Motor_Vehicle  1,75 hp 1,3 KW
http://www.twinkletoesengineering.info/wells_auto_museum/baker_electric_technology.htm#Does 300% overload rating mean the Baker motor can output 10.5 hp?


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                magnetic power amplifier
                                                                                   +                           
                                                 Pulse generator ( Frequency/Amplitude/Duration=duty cycle)
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Mechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/1180
                                                                                  +
http://maddsci.tripod.com/george/
« Last Edit: September 06, 2016, 04:34:15 PM by lancaIV »

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1927
Re: THE INFINITE ARRAY ENERGY GENERATOR PART II
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2016, 12:39:44 AM »
In 1890, Tesla discovered that if he placed a two-foot long single-turn deep copper helix coil near his magnetic disrupter, the thin-walled coil developed a sheath of white sparks with long silvery white streamers rising from the top of the coil. These discharges appeared to have much higher voltages than the generating circuit. This effect was greatly increased if the coil was placed inside the disrupter wire circle. The discharge seemed to hug the surface of the coil with a strange affinity, and rode up its surface to the open end. The shockwave flowed over the coil at right angles to the windings and produced very long discharges from the top of the coil. With the disrupter charge jumping one inch in its magnetic housing, the coil streamers were more than two feet in length. This effect was generated at the moment when the magnetic field quenched the spark and it was wholly unknown at that time.

This train of very short uni-directional pulses causes a very strange field to expand outwards. This field resembles a stuttering electrostatic field but has a far more powerful effect than would be expected from an electrostatic charge. Tesla was unable to account for the enormous voltage multiplication of his apparatus using any of the electrical formula of his day. He therefore presumed that the effect was entirely due to radiant transformation rules which would have to be determined through experimental measurements. This he proceeded to do.

Tesla had discovered a new induction law where radiant shockwaves actually auto-intensified when encountering segmented objects. The segmentation was the key to releasing the action. Radiant shockwaves encountered a helix and “flashed over” the outer skin, from end to end. This shockwave did not pass through the windings of the coil but treated the surface of the coil as a transmission path. Measurements showed that the voltage increase along the surface of the coil was exactly proportional to the length travelled along the coil, with the voltage increase reaching values of 10,000 volts per inch of coil. The 10,000 volts which he was feeding to his 24 inch coil were being magnified to 240,000 volts at the end of his coil. This was unheard of for simple equipment like that. Tesla also discovered that the voltage increase was mathematically linked to the resistance of the coil winding, with higher resistance windings producing higher voltages.
Tesla then began to refer to his disrupter loop as his special “primary” and to the long helical coil as his special “secondary” but he never intended anyone to equate these terms to those referring to electromagnetic transformers which operate in a completely different way.
There was an attribute which baffled Tesla for a time. His measurements showed that there was no current flowing in the long copper “secondary” coil. Voltage was rising with every inch of the coil, but there was no current flow in the coil itself. Tesla started to refer to his measured results as his “electrostatic induction laws”. He found that each coil had its own optimum pulse duration and that the circuit driving it needed to be “tuned” to the coil by adjusting the length of the pulses to give the best performance.
Tesla then noticed that the results given by his experiments paralleled the equations for dynamic gas movements, so he began wondering if the white flame discharges might not be a gaseous manifestation of electrostatic force. He found that when a metal point was connected to the upper terminal of the “secondary” coil, the streamers were directed very much like water flowing through a pipe. When the stream was directed at distant metal plates, it produced electronic charges which could be measured as current at the receiving site but in transit, no current existed. The current only appeared when the stream was intercepted. Eric Dollard has stated that this intercepted current can reach several hundred or even thousands of amps.
Tesla made another remarkable discovery. He connected a very heavy U-shaped copper bar directly across the primary of his disrupter, forming a dead short-circuit. He then connected several ordinary incandescent filament bulbs between the legs of the U-shaped bar. When the equipment was powered up, the lamps lit with a brilliant cold white light. This is quite impossible with conventional electricity, and it shows clearly that what Tesla was dealing with was something new. This new energy is sometimes called “cold electricity” and Edwin Gray sr. demonstrated how different it is by lighting incandescent-filament bulbs directly from his power tube, submerging them in water and putting his hand in the water. Cold electricity is generally considered to be harmless to humans. Ed Gray’s power tube operates by generating radiant electricity waves by using a spark gap, and collecting the energy using three encasing copper cylinders surrounding the spark gap. The cylinders are drilled with many holes as that enhances the pick-up and the load is driven directly from the current in the cylinders. When lighting bulbs, Ed used an air-cored transformer made of just a few turns of very heavy wire. I, personally, am aware of two people who have independently reproduced Ed’s power tube.
Tesla viewed the streamers coming off his coils as being wasted energy so he tried to suppress them. He tried a conical coil but found that this accentuated the problem. He then tried placing a copper sphere at the top of his coil. This stopped the streamers but electrons were dislodged from the copper sphere, creating really dangerous conditions. This implied that metals generate electron flows when struck by the coil streamers (as had been seen when the streamers had been aimed at remote metal plates and current was generated as a result).
Tesla designed, built and used large globe lamps which required only a single external plate for receiving the radiant energy. No matter how far away these lamps were from the radiant source, they became brilliantly lit, almost to the level of an arc lamp and far, far brighter than any of the conventional Edison filament lamps. By adjusting the voltage and the pulse duration of his apparatus, Tesla could also heat or cool a room.
Tesla’s experiments suggest that a method of extracting free-energy is to use a Tesla coil which has a metal spike instead of the more common metal sphere at the end of the “secondary” coil. If the Tesla coil is fed with sufficiently short uni-directional pulses and the “secondary” coil pointed at a metal plate, then it should be possible to draw off serious levels of power from the metal plate, just as Tesla discovered. This has been confirmed by Don Smith who uses two metal plates separated by a layer of plastic dielectric, forming a capacitor. He states that a well designed Tesla coil is capable of producing currents as high as the voltages and he demonstrates a hand-held 28 watt Tesla Coil played on the first plate producing a substantial continuous spark discharge between the second plate and ground.
also see http://www.scribd.com/doc/43184405/Practical-Guide-to-Free-Energy-Devices-Dec-2010-for-Scribd-OCred


 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: