hi
i dont want to put you down for the work your doing, but i have to ask what you are trying to achieve by the cells you have created???

they cant put out more than 1/2 lpm

i hope your not planning on selling them to use under the bonnet of a car....

you may now think that i am a sceptic, well im not. in fact i have a true hydrogen powered car (smart car)

it doesnt however run on a jam jar, it uses 20kg of aluminium as a reactant releasing pure hydrogen.

just do the maths mate.

lets say for instance you wanna run a 1 litre engine at tickover (800rpm)
this means your engine will use 400 litres of air, the fuel/air ratio for an i.c.e is 70:1 so hydrogen fuel required is 5.7 litres.

since a hho generator produces 2/3 hydrogen and 1/3 oxygen we can say that even if you produce 1/2 lpm of hho only 350cc of this is hydrogen

on this basis if you were to try to run an engine with this it would take 17 jars runing at full capacity. thats without taking into account the load on the engine caused by running the cells and also engine inefficiencies
if you were to put 350cc of hho into an engine running on petrol this would account for only 1.5% of the fuel required.  even if you come up with the smart idea of fooling the lambda sensor to lean off the fuel, the most you can lean it off by is 1.5% as the figures would suggest or you in fact run the engine lean, risking burnt valves etc.

even using your figures of 1 1/2 lpm using the whole hho gas it would still only account for 5% of the required fuel using petrol and you would need 5 jars to cope with the flow to tickover on hho alone.

sorry for the rant but it annoys me when people come up with these scams to try and make a quick buck without doing any simple figures.  unless your one of the people who think this little jar can produce 1 million lpm and sustain mankind using 1 amp of power

There are countless people doing what your doing, why dont car manufacturers do what your doing??? why dont halfords stock them to the rafters??? why have i never seen one under the bonnet of a taxi??
why are the people selling them always spamming sites to get attention???

oh and why has it been scientifically proved to NOT work.

i am an engineer and have a team of mechanics at my disposal for the work and research i conduct. we have tried one of these setups on a car and yes i agree the figures at first glance speak for themselves, more mpg

now if you try what i tell you and answer the question honestly you will find that if you remove just the hho cell leaving the lambda spacer in place you will get even more mpg.

this is due to simple thermodynamics, whatever mpg saving you were making with the jar onboard will now increase even more due to the load of that jar being removed so the engine doesnt have to work as hard. the fuel saving you are making are due to the fact that you have pulled the lambda out of the path of the exhaust stream, by doing this the lambda will now tell the ecu it has less oxygen the ecu will compensate my cutting back on fuel to match the oxygen content.

so as you can see just simply by putting a lambda spacer on you can save money......

now then i am awfully sorry to burst your bubble but heres what happens when introduce hho into a petrol fuel system

hho enters the airflow and gets drawn into the cylinders this mixes with the petrol and air to produce a HIGHER OXTANE FUEL.....
now we all know what higher octane fuel does...
the hydrogen burns with the petrol seperatly at the same time, the hydrogen burns with oxygen to produce water

so all you have done is use loads of amps to produce this hho gas pump it into the engine and burn it seperatly. doing absolutly nothing.

i can also tell you why it doesnt do anything to the petrol. petrol has a perfect fuel to air ratio of 14.7:1 , hydrogen has a fuel to air ratio of 2:1 hence the name HHO

2 HYDROGEN 1 OXYGEN well if thats what your putting into the engine and thats what has to burn to get water out then where does it influence the more complete burn of fuel or speed up the burn?

now then do some simple maths which most people fail to do.... your running a 3.1 litre engine, lets assume that its just ticking over at 800rpm that means that the engine requires an airflow of 1240 litres of air per minute, this equates to 84 litres of petrol vapour per minute.
now your jar is producing lets say 2 litres per minute of hho gas at absolute best.  whats 2 litres of gas per minute gonna do to petrol running at 84 litres per minute.

to put that into further contrast 2 litres must be devided per stroke so 1 revolution of your engine would use up 2.5cc of hho gas 2.5cc must then be divided by the 6 cylinders you are running, this means that in each cylinder there is only 0.4cc of hho being burned with the equivalent of 17.5cc of petrol vapour.

im not sure that you can even ignite 0.4cc of hho in air even if it did it wouldnt make a bang ...............so how can it work

it works because the ecu thinks it doesnt need as much fuel.

if you come up with a theory as to why it does work then prove it and become a millionaire overnight. noone has yet

I remember reading about something like that a few years ago, any chance of a "Quick Start" guide ?. 

i dont want to go onto something different really as this isnt my thread, if you email me at hydro-cell@live.co.uk with the questions you need answering i will try and reply