Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 489683
  • *Total Topics: 14414
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 217
  • *Total: 220

Facebook

Author Topic: simple OU proof  (Read 2668 times)

Offline dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 951
simple OU proof
« on: May 20, 2016, 09:43:36 PM »
various claims exist about some methods, hho, joe cell, bubblers etc. with electrolysis efficiency above 100%, however, let us for now only assume that we can split water and recombine the gasses with zero% loss, as the basis of the following idea / law of energy conservation violation:

down in the vally we split the water into h2 and o. This gas mix is lighter than air. We can use it to transport a load up on the mountain, like eg. with a zeppelin, or simply let it flow up trough a pipe. On the mountain top we use the gas as energy source, resulting in recombined h2o.

This water we let flow down trough a pipe, driving a waterwheel somewhere and finally arriving again down in the valley.
 
I don't know about you, but to me this looks like proof for free energy.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

simple OU proof
« on: May 20, 2016, 09:43:36 PM »

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8362
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2016, 10:04:26 PM »
various claims exist about some methods, hho, joe cell, bubblers etc. with electrolysis efficiency above 100%, however, let us for now only assume that we can split water and recombine the gasses with zero% loss, as the basis of the following idea / law of energy conservation violation:

down in the vally we split the water into h2 and o. This gas mix is lighter than air. We can use it to transport a load up on the mountain, like eg. with a zeppelin, or simply let it flow up trough a pipe. On the mountain top we use the gas as energy source, resulting in recombined h2o.

This water we let flow down trough a pipe, driving a waterwheel somewhere and finally arriving again down in the valley.
 
I don't know about you, but to me this looks like proof for free energy.

That is one of the most interesting ideas I have ever read on here.  Simple, yet brilliant!

This replaces the evaporation part (solar power) of what happens to run a water wheel from a river. 

What about this...use the energy pulled from that water turbine/wheel to split the water via a generator?  The gas burning on top of the hill produces electricity, and the water running back down the hill produces electricity, so now the process is indeed free...and maybe even some left over?

I would love to see some real world number calculations on this process...my guess is they would be pretty good.

Excellent idea Sir.

Bill

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2016, 10:05:43 PM »
@Dieter

Yes and generate ecectricity as we our selves decend back into
into the valley.

Offline Dog-One

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 746
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2016, 10:20:32 PM »
I guess what I would like to know with exact numbers is how much electrical energy it would take to split one gallon of H2O into gas and then how many BTUs I could get back and have my original one gallon of water again.

I suspect what we will find is it takes a tremendous amount of electrical energy by way of electrolysis to turn one gallon of water into gas; that one gallon of water, depending upon how high up we transport it may be able to do a little bit of work on the way down, but it will probably pale in comparison to the amount of work the gases can do recombining back to water--even if we have nearly 100% efficiency in all the conversions.

You could probably improve the outcome slightly by venting the O2 and just using the H2 to do the lifting, then use the O2 from the top of the mountain to combine back to water.  I still don't think you would get much optimization from your idea, especially when you add back the typical losses in such a system.

Your concept is in a way a means to utilize all the waste losses and get something back for your effort.  If done completely perfect, this gives you 100% efficiency which is still break-even.



Offline Turbo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
    • Youtube
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2016, 10:38:42 PM »
Why does it always need to be OU.
It's perfectly possible to drive the electrolysis by solar or wind power and store the hydrogen in a tank.
Which then can be used later to heat your home, or to power your home and even drive your car by making use of a fuel cell.
It all exists why does it always have to be the things that are out of reach ?
Unless you are paying for sunlight and wind this is about as free as it get's.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2016, 10:38:42 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 951
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2016, 10:54:48 PM »
This is the whole point on ou.com. Wind and sun is nice, ok, but not the point.

A theoretical 1:1 splitting / recombining at 100% is the basis, and is the official maximum per Faraday.

The bonus of a first lighter and then heavier than air medium allows excess energy extraction. Why can't you just say "heureka!"

^^

Offline gsmsslsb

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 73
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2016, 11:34:17 PM »
Good idea
I had the same idea and it is posted on this forum somewhere but to split the H and O underwater and use the flotation. I think with flotation you would get the same amount of energy in a smaller depth than air because of the denser medium.
Also from some of my research splitting water is slightly more efficient at higher pressure. If you do it at a very great depth you can use very high pressure without a super strong pressure vessel because the exterior pressure  will equal interior pressure.
I don't want to hijack your thread so I will leave it at that.
Honestly I have not tried it . I moved on with other things may be I shouldn't have.


A couple of threads here with drawings


 http://overunity.com/8047/buoyancy-cycle-mg-where-the-h-is-free/msg201083/#msg201083
http://overunity.com/6028/h20-and-bouyancy/msg137038/#msg137038

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2016, 11:34:17 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Floor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2016, 11:41:15 PM »
                     EUREKA

    Combining 2 or more systems

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5973
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2016, 12:35:57 AM »
Just to mention

this is also very much in line with member EvolvingApe's open source contributions here and elsewhere .

I will add some links later.

* here is one link
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2288.150

respectfully

Chet K

Offline dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 951
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2016, 02:32:35 AM »
@ gsmsslsb

I had that idea too. Didn't know about the pressure thing tho.

Thanks everybody.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2016, 02:32:35 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline conradelektro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1544
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2016, 07:34:34 PM »
Wow! So far we have three different inventors of the same world saving device!

Who will become rich?
Who will become famous?
Who will save the world?

Maybe the world refuses to be saved?

Greetings, Conrad


Offline dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 951
Re: simple OU proof
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2016, 01:53:04 PM »
All I know is this stagnation of mans evolution due to the semi-apes who run the petro-dollar complex can't last forever.

Even if they evolve to real people, or get locked away in zoos, one way or an other it will end.

And if I am contributing to such an aim, I need no filthy money as a reward.


 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: