Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 491698
  • *Total Topics: 14471
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 10
  • *Guests: 85
  • *Total: 95

Facebook

Author Topic: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)  (Read 5209 times)

Offline PIH123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« on: January 27, 2016, 06:56:49 PM »
This thread is intended for anyone who was actively involved in building / testing / experimenting with
the QEG to report actual results.

I hope it will also serve as place that people may find on the web, who are looking for real word experience with the QEG.



As you probably know, HopeGirl announced a on Jul 12, 2015 that the QEG had achieved a successful phase 3 (self running).
Plans were provided on how to get there, but no results.
Now they are seeking funding for a smaller generator based on this success.

Their principal forum (be-do.com) went quiet after the announcement with only a couple of posts a month maximum,
and they were mostly introductions.
I would have expected the exact opposite !!!


But we have people at this forum who were supportive of the QEG.
I know Luc Choquette GOTOLUC  was heavily involved in a replication, but he went quiet on this also.
It is fairly typical for a replication to go quiet following an unsuccessful attempt, so this is not a dig at Luc.


In the case of the QEG, there are a number of things I have done to change the Status Quo.
And so now, I am asking you, Please Luc, report your findings.
regardless of whether they are a positive or negative experience.


Many at this site were following your build and encouraging you,
so a bottom line report would be fair.

Did / does it work ?
How far were you in when you realized what the likely outcome would be ?
Were you helped by any communication from FTW (either via their reports, forum etc) ?
Do you think they were open / honest ?
Anything else you want to mention ?


Many Thanks

Pete

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline markdansie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1465
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2016, 02:35:08 AM »
This is a very worthy thread
It is an unfortunate that no one including James has every built a working QEG producing more output than input.
Many replications were made in public and private, but sadly none achieved overunity.
Perhaps someone did and your thread will encourage them to come forward.


Sadly Hopegirl has little or no credibility with the last two crowdfunding activities being suspended.


Kind Regards
Mark


Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5999
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2016, 03:12:09 AM »
Well
It seems aimed at Luc ??

Being called out by full name [as I see now in previous posts with threats included ]
By an anonymous couch potato on a public forum ??


what's that all about ??
what are you trying to intimate here ??

whats wrong with a PM to Luc ??



Pete who ??



ChetKremens@gmail.com


Offline PIH123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2016, 03:31:13 AM »
Well
It seems aimed at Luc ??

Being called out by full name [as I see now in previous posts with threats included ]
By an anonymous couch potato on a public forum ??


what's that all about ??
what are you trying to intimate here ??

whats wrong with a PM to Luc ??



Pete who ??

ChetKremens@gmail.com

Yes it was aimed at Luc.

And yet I am replying to you Ramset.


Was he supposed to be hiding his full name ?
Seems he f&*cked up the name of his youtube channel (https://www.youtube.com/user/gotoluc) then.
Luc gotoluc Choquette
Linked to here by Luc himself.


And Please provide evidence that I threatened him.
Should be easy to do, eh Chet (who) ?


And I am the "Pete" who shut down their crowdfunding campaign.
And QEG Canada.
And two others so far.
So i am not a couch potato.


And I could give a rats ass what website I get results on.
Whether it be Stefans site (not yours by the way) or wherever.

Pete


Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5999
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2016, 03:37:25 AM »
so Pete who ?

take credit for your good works ?

are you aiming sites at Builders here now ?

ChetKremens@gmail.com

Pete who ??




Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2016, 03:37:25 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline PIH123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2016, 03:40:24 AM »
so Pete who ?

take credit for your good works ?

are you aiming sites at Builders here now ?

Can you not read Chet ?

Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5999
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2016, 03:42:31 AM »
So I take that as a yes by the tittle of the thread and your "shut em down"
statement

Pete who ?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2016, 03:42:31 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline PIH123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2016, 04:02:46 AM »
So I take that as a yes by the tittle of the thread and your "shut em down"
statement

Pete who ?


I don't think for one minute that builders should be shut down.
Come on Chet. Don't make stuff up.


I think if they have engaged this site with documentation of a build / replication,
links to their youtube site etc, they should post final results or at least what they now know.


I mentioned this in the the other thread.

You do know that a 75 widow is being relieved of $120,000 right ?
She may be OK with that having done due diligence, found and read Lucs contribution,
and thought, well at least he thinks it works.
He never said that it didn't work, but he sure as heck knows the answer to that
through actual experimentation.


So what would you do Chet ?
If you knew for a fact that an old lady was being scammed,
and you said nothing.

Are you supporting that Chet ?

Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5999
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2016, 04:10:12 AM »
Pete
We are not talking about Chet
We are talking about Pete the supposedly anonymous man demanding information from an experimenter / member here
By his full name ??
 And
Asking what I feel he already knows

Luc said at the get go he was unable to see what was being claimed

A Pm would have sufficed.

No Pete needs peeps to know he's here and experimenters need to know it too, he's saving the world and theres new rules
Report to him
Or ??

Pete who ??



Offline PIH123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2016, 04:31:58 AM »
Stefan,

I am PM'ing you the same request.

Please remove this thread.
The members of this forum have no backbone.

Many Thanks for allowing my participation here.


Pete

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2016, 04:31:58 AM »
Sponsored links:




Online ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5999
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2016, 04:57:14 AM »
Pete
what does this have to do with back bones?

?

odd very odd indeed...









Offline gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2837
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2016, 05:00:05 AM »
we have people at this forum who were supportive of the QEG.
I know Luc Choquette GOTOLUC  was heavily involved in a replication, but he went quiet on this also.
It is fairly typical for a replication to go quiet following an unsuccessful attempt, so this is not a dig at Luc.

Hi Pete,
Your statement is incorrect. I was not heavily involved in the QEG movement.
When I first heard of the QEG I gathered all the information I could find on the web about how the QEG works.
From that and not having funds to build what was recommended, I built a poor mans device, in hopes to simulate the effect of varying inductance in a core which has a high and low impedance coil. I used 2 identical microwave oven transformers to achieve this and got the famous resonance they were all excited about. However, I was not exited about it as I could see the effect coupled right back to the prime mover (motor turning the device) which you can hear the motor rpm drop (in my demo video) when the two series bulbs would dimly light. I reported my results to many different forums in hope someone would inform me of what I'm missing and or bring awareness that this may not be working as they claimed and left it to people to decide.

In the case of the QEG, there are a number of things I have done to change the Status Quo.
And so now, I am asking you, Please Luc, report your findings.
regardless of whether they are a positive or negative experience.

After my simple proof of concept I did not believe James QEG device worked so I stayed away till proven wrong.
Still to date I don't think is been proven to work as they claimed.

Many at this site were following your build and encouraging you,
so a bottom line report would be fair.

Interestingly, no one really asked me what I thought. Even if they did, I might of just said I had an unsuccessful replication (if you can call it a replication). I never engaged in critisizing James and his team like others have on this site. I always waited to see what would come of it.

Did / does it work ?
How far were you in when you realized what the likely outcome would be ?
Were you helped by any communication from FTW (either via their reports, forum etc) ?
Do you think they were open / honest ?
Anything else you want to mention ?


Many Thanks

Pete

No, it did not work for me and it seems to be the same for James and the organization.
I realized it did not work (using the information I had) after my last video demo and forum posts.
I was not helped or contacted by the FTW organization.
I believe James original intent was genuine but I think he may have been influenced to make claims too soon.
Nothing to add other then it's sad how this all turned out for those who had hoped this was real and invested much in that belief.

Regards

Luc


Offline gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2837
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2016, 05:11:44 AM »
Yes it was aimed at Luc.

And yet I am replying to you Ramset.


Was he supposed to be hiding his full name ?
Seems he f&*cked up the name of his youtube channel (https://www.youtube.com/user/gotoluc) then.
Luc gotoluc Choquette
Linked to here by Luc himself.

Pete

Dear Pete,

just to let you know, my youtube account was always named gotoluc (last 7 years anyways) It's the same user name I use on all the forums to keep it simple. However, when I opened a gmail account over a year ago it automatically changed my youtube account to Luc Choquette (my name) without asking. Seems there is nothing I could do to change it back. The only option was to add a middle name, so I added gotoluc so people could still identified it.

Hope this clears the issue

Regards

Luc

Offline PIH123

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 163
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2016, 05:44:35 AM »
Hi Pete,
Your statement is incorrect. I was not heavily involved in the QEG movement.
When I first heard of the QEG I gathered all the information I could find on the web about how the QEG works.
From that and not having funds to build what was recommended, I built a poor mans device, in hopes to simulate the effect of varying inductance in a core which has a high and low impedance coil. I used 2 identical microwave oven transformers to achieve this and got the famous resonance they were all excited about. However, I was not exited about it as I could see the effect coupled right back to the prime mover (motor turning the device) which you can hear the motor rpm drop (in my demo video) when the two series bulbs would dimly light. I reported my results to many different forums in hope someone would inform me of what I'm missing and or bring awareness that this may not be working as they claimed and left it to people to decide.

After my simple proof of concept I did not believe James QEG device worked so I stayed away till proven wrong.
Still to date I don't think is been proven to work as they claimed.

Interestingly, no one really asked me what I thought. Even if they did, I might of just said I had an unsuccessful replication (if you can call it a replication). I never engaged in critisizing James and his team like others have on this site. I always waited to see what would come of it.

No, it did not work for me and it seems to be the same for James and the organization.
I realized it did not work (using the information I had) after my last video demo and forum posts.
I was not helped or contacted by the FTW organization.
I believe James original intent was genuine but I think he may have been influenced to make claims too soon.
Nothing to add other then it's sad how this all turned out for those who had hoped this was real and invested much in that belief.

Regards

Luc

Many Thanks for the reply gotoluc (sorry if you don't want your other name used BTW).
And thanks for clearing a few things up.

The last post I was able to view from you in that other thread was on or about page 29,
where your last statement was that "this sort of machine is not perfected yet"
and not to tackle unless you are an expert in variable inductance machines.
That could leave potential investors (unskilled in variable inductance machines) browsing the
web for due diligence with the impression that it very may well work.

I have NEVER seen it written, that it simply does not work.
By you, QEG South Africa, Taiwan or the 5,000 Chinese engineers shipped over to work on it.
Sorry if I missed that.



And yet the funding continues.
Upon reading about the old lady and the $120,000,
I decided that if I was able to prevent such a thing happening again,
I should do it.
This thread is part of that endeavor and again I thank you for contributing.

My goal is not to shut down replicators (as Chet very well knows),
but to prevent some of the funding and to have it documented somewhere,
why the funding should not continue with the FTW group.

FTW knowingly lied in the Sterling interview when they said it had
been running for hundreds of hours at 9,300 watts.
And they have received upwards of $300,000 since then based on that statement.



I do not regret the way I am going about this, and will continue here
or wherever I chose, and am allowed to post.
It only costs me time which I can afford.



I do regret however having to indulge Ramset above in that p*ssing match.

And, for that reason, I have asked Stefan to remove this post since it benefits no-one.

I will be continuing this as I chose

Many Thanks

Pete


Offline sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2351
Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2016, 06:16:32 AM »
one thing to remember in this field of research.....

If someone is asking for funding, or other monetary gain
They are doing so with mal-intent, and do not have a working device to show prior to the funding.
nor after......

That is not to say that researchers do not need funding, many of us spend our own hard earned money building replications and conceptual builds without ever asking for a dime.

If they are genuine, they will have a working proof of concept to display before asking for $ to build a larger one (mass produce, etc.)
to purchase rare elemental unobtanium crystals, that cost a fortune, but if used in some machine might produce "free energy".

The truth of the matter is, free energy technology is considered a "disruptive technology".
it does not generate money, it does the opposite.
It increases the energy supply, without cost,
thus depleting the net worth of the industry.

Theres no "money" to be made in this field, except by scammers, or those whose intentions are to prevent us from succeeding.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: QEG Replication Results (gotoluc ?)
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2016, 06:16:32 AM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: