This is genius

This opens up a whole world of possibilities, potential solutions to magnetic problems


the idea of anchoring it through magnetic attraction, then allowing the anchors and/or repellors to move in constrained degrees of motion.......

im going to be busy with this for a while, Thank you good sir !!!

P.S. - I applaud you for making this information public. Generally I am against patenting when it comes to "free energy",
but this is much bigger than that, so if you have a way to make money on certain aspects of your designs I say go for it, the toy industry might just make you rich.

Earnshaw's theorem still applies, and always has.
even in the passive example above, if examined closely with no wind
I believe you will find his principals in perfect working order.

what changes is peoples interpretation of it.

Just to clarify,  that last design I posted here on :

   -  Reply #2 on: January 10, 2016, 03:50:00 PM

I did not call that particular one an invention,  and thats probably not one I would include in something I would send to a Patent-Registry.

Wondering if my hopefully new-invention  DC-motors( in the PDF file for download ),   which I thought up from my questions on following page  http://overunity.com/15978/new-reactionless-motor-from-india/msg459441/#msg459441,  could possibly be as efficient at generating electricity,   as they should be as motors

I didn't know about what can be achieved with Electrostatic-Levitation .

I just discovered, on youtube,  that an electrically-charged( just with static-electricity, no batteries/mains power ) piece-of-plastic,  can levitate a hoop( made of very thin shopping-bag-plastic ),  and it looks like it could do that stably enough,  although I don't know if that charge would dissipate in air.

     So,  I think that another version of a toy-maglev-train,  could possible use  Electrostatic-Levitation   instead of  permanent-magnets,   although obviously it would be very-very difficult to make a shape to levitate,  that would resemble a train or anything else
(  But in I have seen recent inventions of extremely ultra-light gel-like( or foam ) like materials,  made out of all kinds of things,  and at least some of those could be levitated using  Electrostatic-Levitation  )

( This is guest1289 , this is my other account ,  because of other things I'm doing )

Yes, of course you're right, building something is the only way to try and detect any potential in a design.
But I won't be able to build anything, for reasons I won't waste time typing.
(  different people saying that,  doesn't make it any simpler )

(  and if hypothetically I did, and I would probably fail,  but that does not mean someone else could not get a design working later on )

Anyone could try and see if any of my designs could work.

(  maybe you could look at  magnet-motor-1,  magnet-motor-2,  and the versions of magnet-motor-3   that I have posted very recently on   http://overunity.com/15774/permanent-magnet-motor/165/#.Vr-up7QrJH0 ,   you could design all sorts of variants of   magnet-motor-2  and  magnet-motor-3,  which are based on the same principle. 
    of course, no  magnet-motor  can function,  I just like designs which make you wonder specifically why they won't function etc  )

All-Permanent-Magnet-Full-Levitation   is a completely different subject,  and I think some designs could function .

Keep in mind,    ideas  like a  very large-flat-magnetic-surface   floating above one of the  arrays-of-tiny-spaced-magnets  that I have posted( or in the document posted containing my designs ),  or,  over a halbach-array .
  Or,  even ideas like 1 halbach array,  floating above another halbach array ,  etc, etc.
   ( I'm assume that I have not invented any new type of  array-design,  maybe I  should check,  and they are probably too similar to halbach-arrays to be new )

   You can have arrays where the tiny-magnets are spaced apart,  or,  not spaced apart.
   Arrays make it a lot easier to achieve levitation.
   (  I did see an electric-motor on a site,  which uses a halbach array to levitate the rotating component inside the array circle,  without power,  but I'm not sure if it also levitates along the axis of the axle.  )

    I will see if I can find the webpage, I think it may have been a free-energy related site

While I have been posting on the thread below
http://overunity.com/16448/modified-electrophorus-precharged-variable-capacitor/msg476636/#new
I'm thinking of modifications to the design( designs ) posted on the thread,  and I'm posting it here first so as not to fill up the other thread with   'my lots of text without offering significant contributions to the development'  in that thread.

Basically, the designs in the thread above eliminates the requirement for the ground-plate( electret )  and the top-metal-plate to touch each other in order to cause  charge-separation ,  it is done by adding circuitry to the electrophorus.

My idea is to eliminate the need for the  top-metal-plate  to be moved up and down,  since it is probably not necessary,  and can just be done through the circuitry .

However, since I won't be able to design my own circuit at the moment,  my idea is to wire the  electrophorus all up to one of those slide-switches  like the ones in clock-radios  which you slide-along to select the different functions  am/fm/sleep/set,  so one switch like that,  can have 5-functions.
    However,  my idea is to make this sliding switch out of a free-rolling-toy-train( a good-quality one ) rolling along a good-quality toy-train-track,  and as the train-wheels pass over different parts of the track they close-circuits and open-circuits.
       Although,  I would prefer to actually use my  permanent-magnet-levitation  methods to actually use a  fully-levitating( or almost fully-levitating if makes it easier) toy-train instead,  in order  to greatly reduce friction,  however then the circuits would have to be opened or closed with  contactless-magnetic-flip-flop-switches ( or with brushes if it makes it easier ) .