.

    A SUPERCONDUCTOR ELECTRIC-MOTOR WOULD BREAK THE LAWS OF PHYSICS / THERMODYNAMICS

    If an  Electric-Motor was made of a room temperature superconductor like  graphene,   then no electricity would be consumed ( or lost, or leaked ),     and the resulting kinetic energy would be gained from nothing,  the kinetic energy would just be a  side-effect  )

    (  For this experiment,  the Power-Source,  would have to be one in which no energy is unintentionally leaked,  so batteries would be unsuitable ( heat loss etc ),   even a bank of capacitors would lose heat  )

    (  Actually, in a normal electric-motor,  apparently,  the resulting kinetic energy is  not as a result of electricity being consumed / lost in order to produce it,  the kinetic energy is like a side-effect.   In normal electric-motors,  electricity is consumed / lost,  as a result of the materials not being superconductors  )

    (  Note :  I doubt that a totally  100% Superconductor exists,  or can exist  )

   THIS THEORY COULD BE USED TO BUILD AN  OVERUNITY DEVICE
   This theory could be used to build an overunity device,  made ENTIRELY of a room temperature superconductor material( like graphene ),  a device in which no energy would be lost due to heat or anything else,   and the resulting  kinetic-energy  would just be a side effect of the flow of electricity.  Finding a power-source which does not unintentionally leak energy,  could be difficult.



   

NOT ONLY AM I RIGHT,    I'M SO MUCH MORE..................THAN................RIGHT

Not only am I correct,  but I grossly understated how correct I am ( I only just discovered these things when I searched the internet ).

THE POWER SOURCE FOR THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE ( SUPERCONDUCTOR ELECTRIC-MOTOR )
The Power-Source for this  Overunity Device ( Superconductor Electric-Motor ) would be the phenomenon called 'Persistent Current',   'Persistent current is a perpetual electric current, not requiring an external power source',   (  this has been scientifically confirmed ).    Below  :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persistent_current

(  I wonder if they're actually wrong about 'Persistent Current',  because all types of radiation pass through virtually every material,  and that could somehow end up causing an electrical current to be generated in the materials they tested ( and the properties of the materials,  magnetic or other,  could cause the electrical current to just flow in one direction  )

THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE WOULD BE MADE OF  'STANENE'
This  Overunity Device ( Superconductor Electric-Motor ) would be made of  STANENE ,  which apparently is  100% efficient  ( although I thought only a vacuum could be a 100% efficient electrical conductor  )

NOTE : This  OVERUNITY DEVICE  would be housed in a vacuum,  and would only spin to generate electricity,  and only in a generator-design which has no friction

This 'Overunity Device' would use  Room-Temperature-Superconductor  equivalents of  Permanent-Magnet-Bearings,  and it would be housed in a VACUUM. 
(  So,  no moving parts would touch anything,  and there would be no air friction )

THIS OVERUNITY DEVICE
The phenomenon called  'Persistent Current' would power the Superconductor-Electric-Motor,  and the  Superconductor-Electric-Motor  would spin the  Superconductor-Electrical-Generator.

(  This 'Overunity Device'  only uses room-temperature superconductors  )

Since it uses 'Persistent Current' to power the Superconductor-Electric-Motor,  there is No input of electrical energy coming from outside of  this  'Overunity Device' ,  to power it.

THE REASON IT WOULD BE OVERUNITY
'If',  it did require an initial electrical-input from outside of this Overunity-Device,   in order to get the electric-motor spinning,  and if that that input was for example  12-Volts for 10 seconds,  then that would be much less than the  Total-Power-Output  of this  Overunity-Device  over 5 Years( as an example ), and I am very understating the  'overunity'  there.

The only way to prove or disprove this 'Overunity Device' for sure,   would be to build it .

Why doesn't someone try and disprove or prove a   'Permanent-Magnet-Motor'  which CAN-ACTUALLY-BE-EASILY-BUILT  ( unlike this Superconductor-Device  ).   I'm not able to construct anything at all.

THE  'DRUM VERSION'  OF THE  'MAGNET-MOTOR'  I POSTED ONTO THE THREAD I STARTED BELOW  :
http://overunity.com/15860/can-anyone-identify-this-mystery-magnet-motor-or-provide-any-information/msg454682/#msg454682