Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

movieclipsfree

movie clips free

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81711
  • *Latest: a1abhi

  • *Total Posts: 485277
  • *Total Topics: 14263
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 182
  • *Total: 188

Facebook

Author Topic: Elementary Physics Revisited  (Read 4542 times)

Offline nilrehob

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2015, 08:45:43 AM »
Hi Hob,

Thanks for the paper, interesting read. I have not seen such conclusion as the amount of copper determines the force per power ratio, it includes more things than the length of the wire, this latter was known of course as the more turns (i.e the higher inductance), the more force.

Would like to read your opinion on the following winding method I think I read it from member wattsup long time ago.
It involves a multilayer coil, say when the first layer is finished, you do not continue the winding backwards to make the second layer but you bring back the wire straight to and above the start of the first layer and you make the second layer in the same winding direction as the first layer was wound. Then finishing the second layer, you bring back the wire straight again to and above the start of the second layer and make the third layer in the same winding direction as the second (and of course the first) layer was.  And so on and on with the rest of the layers if needed. No any other special requirement on the shape, sizes etc of the coil wound this way was mentioned.
Can you judge whether there would be any advantage in using such winding method? I have not tested this, just occured to me that you or your colleague may have some info on this, or just a gut feeling?  8)

Thanks,
Gyula


My gut feeling is that directional-winded coils does not matter if used as an electromagnet, but if you pulse it i'm sure it makes a difference. Im pretty confident the original equation F = ... Nˆ2 Iˆ2 A holds. I have just rearranged it trying to make real world sense to it.


/Hob

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #15 on: November 22, 2015, 08:45:43 AM »

Offline gyulasun

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3421
Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #16 on: November 22, 2015, 12:04:00 PM »
Hi Hob,

Okay, thanks for your answer.

Gyula

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline nilrehob

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #17 on: November 22, 2015, 05:13:57 PM »
Minor changes to paper 1-4,
paper 5 had the experiment redone with more coils.

/Hob

Offline nilrehob

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2015, 10:38:15 AM »
There is a new version of paper 5 out with added sections.
Paper 1-4 have only minor changes.
You find them at:
https://sites.google.com/site/nilrehob/home/elementary-physics

If anyone would like to help with spelling, grammar, wording, content, whatever,
please go to github and contribute:
https://github.com/boherlin/elementary-physics

We have also made a bitcoin-account for donations.
But we're not sure its working, no donations yet..
If anyone could send a tiny-weeny satoshi we would be thrilled.
Account number at the end of the papers.

/Hob


Offline nilrehob

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2015, 05:45:36 PM »
Ouch, fixed a big error in ch 5, another version is out,
interesting how some errors only get caught after it gets public.

/Hob

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2015, 05:45:36 PM »
Sponsored links:




 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: