Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

# New Book

### Statistics

• Total Members: 81711
• Latest: a1abhi

• Total Posts: 485275
• Total Topics: 14263
• Online Today: 44
• Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
• Users: 9
• Guests: 190
• Total: 199

### Author Topic: Elementary Physics Revisited  (Read 4541 times)

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Elementary Physics Revisited
« on: June 02, 2015, 10:14:53 AM »
I have written 4 short papers;

the first explaining how to combine mass in series and in parallel, like 1kg + 1kg = 2kg but also like 1kg + 1kg = 1/2kg.

the second describing how to increase momentum or charge in a system

the third shows a template on how to compare harmonic systems, their variables and equations, like a mass-spring system with a coil-cap system

the forth, which i believe is the most promising, uses the second and the third paper to show how to increase magnetic flux

/Hob

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Elementary Physics Revisited
« on: June 02, 2015, 10:14:53 AM »

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2015, 02:05:57 PM »
We have a new paper out, its the 5th and its called "Increasing Electromagnet Force".

It focus on the force per power ratio in coils.

Since the concept of an electromagnet is present in both motors and generators we find it interesting to study the relationship between the parameters describing the electrical power the coil consumes and the mechanical force with which the coil attracts a piece of ferromagnetic material or a magnet.

The amount of copper in an electromagnet determines the force per power ratio, not the number of turns or the wire thickness in the coil, the more copper the greater force.

To get the best performance in an electromagnet it should be as big as possible, which leads us to believe that motors should have as few and big coils as possible (think Joseph Newman) to increase torque per power. We also believe that the reverse is true, that generators should have as many and small coils as possible to decrease torque per power.

You can find all papers here:

/Hob

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2015, 02:05:57 PM »

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2015, 02:56:55 PM »
I also did a short video on the subject of the 5th paper:

/Hob

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 5853
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2015, 03:04:33 PM »
/Hob
your Video shows a big Exclamation point here [No Vid]
Northeast USA

thanks for sharing your hard work.

Chet

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2015, 03:04:33 PM »

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2015, 03:07:30 PM »
/Hob
your Video shows a big Exclamation point here [No Vid]
Northeast USA

thanks for sharing your hard work.

Chet

Really? Try again, its hyper fresh, maybe internet isn’t that fast after all?

/Hob

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2015, 03:07:30 PM »

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 5853
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2015, 03:14:44 PM »

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2015, 07:03:38 PM »
Please be aware that all previous papers have been updated,
I’m not sure if I should re-upload them here,
but you find them all at:

/Hob

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2015, 07:03:38 PM »

#### gotoluc

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 2765
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2015, 09:26:01 PM »
Thanks for making a video demo Hob

Interesting and useful information to know

Luc

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2015, 09:31:59 PM »
Thanks for making a video demo Hob

Interesting and useful information to know

Luc

Thanks, and yeah I think its vital info.
We'll see what comes out of it.

:-)

/Hob

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2015, 09:33:49 PM »
Does anyone know if there is a limit to how much you can upload to this site?

/Hob

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2015, 09:33:49 PM »

#### gotoluc

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 2765
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2015, 09:49:27 PM »
Does anyone know if there is a limit to how much you can upload to this site?

/Hob

I've been uploading stuff (at this site) for years and never had any limit problems. I know it's an issue at EF but not here.

Luc

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2015, 09:55:55 PM »
I've been uploading stuff (at this site) for years and never had any limit problems. I know it's an issue at EF but not here.

Luc

Ok, then I'll upload them all here once in while when they have been updated, like now; my first 4 papers freshly updated are attached.
The 5th paper is in a post above.

/Hob

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2015, 09:55:55 PM »

#### TinselKoala

• Hero Member
• Posts: 13397
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #12 on: November 21, 2015, 08:46:09 PM »

Quote
Allowed file types: txt, tif, xls, doc, odt, pdf, jpg, jpeg, gif, mp3, mpg, flv, mp4, mpeg, png, rm, ra, rmv, avi, zip, wmv, wma, rar, qt, mov, swf, asf, wm2d, 3gp, 3g2
Restrictions: 12 per post, maximum total size 7000KB, maximum individual size 7000KB

(Just under the "Attach:" window when you are entering a reply.) Note that the forum sometimes has trouble with .zip format files, and that .bmp images are _not_ allowed.

If you upload inline images please try to keep the physical size under 1024 pixels wide. Larger widths will run off the page and screw up the page formatting.

#### nilrehob

• Full Member
• Posts: 100
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2015, 09:51:25 PM »

(Just under the "Attach:" window when you are entering a reply.) Note that the forum sometimes has trouble with .zip format files, and that .bmp images are _not_ allowed.

If you upload inline images please try to keep the physical size under 1024 pixels wide. Larger widths will run off the page and screw up the page formatting.

Thanks!

/Hob

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2015, 09:51:25 PM »

#### gyulasun

• Hero Member
• Posts: 3421
##### Re: Elementary Physics Revisited
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2015, 10:53:17 PM »
Hi Hob,

Thanks for the paper, interesting read. I have not seen such conclusion as the amount of copper determines the force per power ratio, it includes more things than the length of the wire, this latter was known of course as the more turns (i.e the higher inductance), the more force.

Would like to read your opinion on the following winding method I think I read it from member wattsup long time ago.
It involves a multilayer coil, say when the first layer is finished, you do not continue the winding backwards to make the second layer but you bring back the wire straight to and above the start of the first layer and you make the second layer in the same winding direction as the first layer was wound. Then finishing the second layer, you bring back the wire straight again to and above the start of the second layer and make the third layer in the same winding direction as the second (and of course the first) layer was.  And so on and on with the rest of the layers if needed. No any other special requirement on the shape, sizes etc of the coil wound this way was mentioned.
Can you judge whether there would be any advantage in using such winding method? I have not tested this, just occured to me that you or your colleague may have some info on this, or just a gut feeling?

Thanks,
Gyula

We have a new paper out, its the 5th and its called "Increasing Electromagnet Force".

It focus on the force per power ratio in coils.

Since the concept of an electromagnet is present in both motors and generators we find it interesting to study the relationship between the parameters describing the electrical power the coil consumes and the mechanical force with which the coil attracts a piece of ferromagnetic material or a magnet.

The amount of copper in an electromagnet determines the force per power ratio, not the number of turns or the wire thickness in the coil, the more copper the greater force.

To get the best performance in an electromagnet it should be as big as possible, which leads us to believe that motors should have as few and big coils as possible (think Joseph Newman) to increase torque per power. We also believe that the reverse is true, that generators should have as many and small coils as possible to decrease torque per power.

You can find all papers here: