Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Flywheel devices  (Read 53168 times)

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #75 on: March 07, 2015, 05:43:04 PM »
"Yet you erroneously treated weight as mass. " = Another invalid assertion by you.

LOL, It is taken directly from quoting your post.
Quote

The calculator is written to "calculate", and does so. The mass is "CALCULATED" FROM DIAMETER, WIDTH, thus VOLUME, by, along with the objects DENSITY and shows the output in units the real world Man can relate to. Quite correctly.
As was shown to you first by Simon, no, your spreadsheet has errors.
Quote

Evidenced in my writing: "OUTPUT - Mass (weight pounds) displayed in A7 .... =SUM(C6)*0.28333333 [~ Cubic inches x density lb/in^3 ~]"
Weight is gravitational force which can be measured in pounds.  Weight is not mass.  The English unit for mass is a slug.  The acceleration due to the earth's gravity exhibits an average weight at sea level on one slug of ~32.2 lbs.  Move from sea level and the force of gravity per unit mass changes.
Quote

That single point (evidences your invalid assertion) all by itself refutes and renders the rest of your assertions, and questions entirely baseless.
LOL, so you assert.
Quote

To help you CATCH UP I suggest you re-read my work before injecting your CON-fused commentary. Also you may find this: http://serc.carleton.edu/mathyouneed/density/index.html instructive.

"You can surely write or say whatever you please but none of it will change the truth of the mathematics. That is a fact you nor I can get around in reality. "
If you want to wallow in ignorance, that is your choice.

Temporal Visitor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #76 on: March 09, 2015, 01:00:49 AM »
LOL, It is taken directly from quoting your post.As was shown to you first by Simon, no, your spreadsheet has errors.Weight is gravitational force which can be measured in pounds.  Weight is not mass.  The English unit for mass is a slug.  The acceleration due to the earth's gravity exhibits an average weight at sea level on one slug of ~32.2 lbs.  Move from sea level and the force of gravity per unit mass changes.LOL, so you assert.If you want to wallow in ignorance, that is your choice.

Thanks anyhow but I chose science over ignorance long ago and actually have something to show for it rather than merely an internet "expert" persona .
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman

If you wish to carry on in your attempt that's fine - but you really should read my work. If you had you would already know the calculator does the mass calculation as I previously pointed out and BY NOW you should have known or would have deduced it is in SI kilograms.

http://eformulae.com/physics/mass.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_%28mass%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot%E2%80%93pound%E2%80%93second_system#force

Just so you know; Simon (who I respect) never showed anything - he never opened the calculator - he couldn't. But he did attempt to cut it down and the math stood his attack.

So "Simon sez" attacks just don't cut it. No better than the memoryman "Expert in several fields" failed attacks and appeals to "authority" that brought none other than you here to attempt/do what he is incapable of.  Your drive by attacks are wasted effort for both of us. I DON"T NEED IT OR YOU and that's a fact.

Are you able to rise to the occasion of actually dissecting the calculator on YOUR OWN documenting YOUR WORK as a "peer" to FULLY review and debunk/verify mine?

You are an "expert" and able to work in Micro Sloth excel .......... right?

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #77 on: March 09, 2015, 01:24:12 AM »
You have quite the imagination.  I am sure the world will be amazed when you show your working OU device.

ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #78 on: March 09, 2015, 01:52:29 AM »
Temporal you are free to share your views. As long as you stay on topic and stop bickering.

Me and noones were having a fruitful conversation in this thread I made, a refuge of ignorance and oasis of knowledge.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #79 on: March 09, 2015, 02:00:20 AM »



"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman



Well, there is a very big difference here.  Feynman was a genius...you are not.  Feynman was classically trained as a physicist so he learned all that had come before his time, you have not.  For you to apply this quote of his is laughable to say the least.

Bill 

Temporal Visitor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #80 on: March 09, 2015, 02:41:30 AM »
You have quite the imagination.  I am sure the world will be amazed when you show your working OU device.

"OU" device"? Please don't inject delusional thinking.

http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/overunity.html

 

Temporal Visitor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #81 on: March 09, 2015, 03:13:37 AM »
Well, there is a very big difference here.  Feynman was a genius...you are not.  Feynman was classically trained as a physicist so he learned all that had come before his time, you have not.  For you to apply this quote of his is laughable to say the least.

Bill

"he learned all that had come before his time," that is laughable.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #82 on: March 09, 2015, 03:21:55 AM »
When will your Nobel-prize winning invention go into production, oh anointed one?

Temporal Visitor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #83 on: March 09, 2015, 03:24:42 AM »
Temporal you are free to share your views. As long as you stay on topic and stop bickering.

Me and noones were having a fruitful conversation in this thread I made, a refuge of ignorance and oasis of knowledge.

Then don't bicker when I tell you my view: "a refuge of ignorance" is what you made and deserve.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #84 on: March 09, 2015, 03:28:59 AM »
"he learned all that had come before his time," that is laughable.

Laughing at a very intelligent and respected physicist shows where you are coming from.  You are the one that posted his quote to suit your point of view.  Have you read his books?  I have.  All of them.  From an early age he learned conventional science.  He spoke about catching up with what was learned before his time.  Then, he went out on his own...but with a great understanding of science and nature.

Now you laugh at that.

OK.

Fine.

Bill

Temporal Visitor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #85 on: March 09, 2015, 04:05:25 AM »
When will your Nobel-prize winning invention go into production, oh anointed one?

Thanks anyways.

Temporal Visitor

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #86 on: March 09, 2015, 04:31:11 AM »
Laughing at a very intelligent and respected physicist shows where you are coming from.  You are the one that posted his quote to suit your point of view.  Have you read his books?  I have.  All of them.  From an early age he learned conventional science.  He spoke about catching up with what was learned before his time.  Then, he went out on his own...but with a great understanding of science and nature.

Now you laugh at that.

OK.

Fine.

Bill

I did not laugh AT him - I laughed AT YOU writing what you did attempting to knock me when you do not really know me, my studies or my work. Feynman was intelligent enough to state he did not know what energy is, I agreed and learned from there. I admit I don't know "all". You might try to do the same.

Here is a page I wrote on "knowledge" - read it if you please http://www.backgauges.com/Gen-E-Sys%20II/knowledge.html then if you choose to criticize me you'll have all kinds of ammo to pick from.

As for my use of that quote: it fit perfectly.

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #87 on: March 09, 2015, 07:52:35 AM »
Your key concepts are a confused mess.


ARMCORTEX

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: Flywheel devices
« Reply #88 on: March 09, 2015, 09:06:25 AM »
Impressive MarkE.

Nothing gets past you, I'd like to hire you as a lawyer.