Its always good for a laugh when morons tell everybody how unedgumacated they are and then use the word "cites" as if its a noun.

Just a short form for "citation".  It's pretty well known.  If you don't understand something. Please feel free to ask.

Anyone with google knows there were many whistleblowers who came forward...and not just the one guy he keeps referencing.

Please cite.  You said "CDC whistleblower" - this term usually refers to Thompson.  If you are thinking about someone else you only have to provide a reference.  You are probably conflating other nonsense with the current nonsense you are entertaining.

Lets all look at this bozo's logic a little closer shall we...his words - "...statistically significant data was omitted." and - " Hooker is not a statistician which is why he muffed his analysis..."

Maybe he can explain how someone can ' muffed his analysis ' when " statistically significant data was omitted "

*sigh* really.  You should just read the papers instead on relying on your inbred cousin's bag boy for information. The words "statistically significant data was omitted" weren't my words they were Thompson's taken from his press release (Reading! - Try it sometime!).  So it's Thompson's claim that information that would alter the outcome was omitted.  However his judgement on this is based - again from his statement (Reading!) - on Hookers analysis.   Hooker claims that his reanalysis includes data that alters the outcome.  Hooker muffed his analysis, as I stated earlier by using the wrong metric for determining correlation.

So there's no contradiction.  If you don't understand you can always ask.

Just a short form for "citation".  It's pretty well known.  If you don't understand something. Please feel free to ask.Please cite.

Shhhuuuure...he also has a bridge or 3 that he wood also like you to buy.

You said "CDC whistleblower" - this term usually refers to Thompson.  If you are thinking about someone else you only have to provide a reference.  You are probably conflating other nonsense with the current nonsense you are entertaining.*sigh* really.  You should just read the papers instead on relying on your inbred cousin's bag boy for information. The words "statistically significant data was omitted" weren't my words they were Thompson's taken from his press release (Reading! - Try it sometime!).

Yeah, but then I mentioned there were others...after he took the 1 whistleblower bait.

He still hasn't tried to discredit them as yet...we need not wonder why.

So it's Thompson's claim that information that would alter the outcome was omitted.  However his judgement on this is based - again from his statement (Reading!) - on Hookers analysis.   Hooker claims that his reanalysis includes data that alters the outcome.  Hooker muffed his analysis, as I stated earlier by using the wrong metric for determining correlation.

And I suppose all the other whistleblowers muffed things up also.

So there's no contradiction.  If you don't understand you can always ask.

Ask and ye also shall be ignored.


Some of you may be unaware that since i believe the mid 1950's those psychopaths have been taking blood from every new born baby.

Now, why do you suppose they started doing that ?

It certainly couldn't be that their plan was to use DNA genome research to better target certain ethnic groups or individuals with their toxic injections, could it ?

This POS shill has also fail to address the various methods of distributing toxic chemicals to the masses.

He will also side step their depopulation agenda...and this is brazenly written in stone...just google Georgia Guidestones...because he certainly won't address it or provide a reasonable explanation for the ghoulish plot.

Life on this planet doesn't swing any lower than these creepos.

Regards...

Shhhuuuure...

Sorry it's simply a fact. 

"Yes, the word “cite” is a bit jargony, but it’s common among linguists, etymologists, and other language types."

Yeah, but then I mentioned there were others...after he took the 1 whistleblower bait.

It's not "bait".  You talked about the CDC whistleblower singular.   I assume you mean Thompson because that is what most people appear to mean.  If you have some other person in mind you should mention them.

He still hasn't tried to discredit them as yet...we need not wonder why.

Because you haven't told me who you're talking about?

And I suppose all the other whistleblowers muffed things up also.

How many times do you want to misread something?  Hooker is not a whistleblower.  He doesn't work for the CDC.  However Thompson believed Hooker's poor analysis.  So while Thompson (the CDC whistleblower) didn't "muff" anything (other than believing Hooker) he is still wrong.  As for other people that you claim are CDC whistleblowers.   You're going to have to tell me who they are before I tell you  whats wrong (or right) with your position.

This POS shill has also fail to address the various methods of distributing toxic chemicals to the masses.

Right now I'm talking about vaccines.  After I cure you of your crazy I'd be more than happy to talk about your other problems.  This isn't sidestepping it's focusing on the issue being discussed.  What you are doing is often referred to as "moving the goalposts".  Either vaccines are, in and of themselves demonstrably and significantly harmful or they are not.  I say "not" you seem to say they "are".  We don't need to talk about chemtrails or bat boy or ruined temples on the face of mars to make that point.

So out of curiosity.  How many hours did you spend attempting to refute this?

Did you find something in the video which is in
need of refutation?  Refute What?

"Mandrake do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water why there is studies under way to fluoridate: salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk ice cream, ice cream, Mandrake, children's ice cream!"

Yet another awesome reference!

Sorry it's simply a fact.  It's not "bait".  You talked about the CDC whistleblower singular.   I assume you mean Thompson because that is what most people appear to mean.  If you have some other person in mind you should mention them. Because you haven't told me who you're talking about?

According to the thread transcript, I didn't name Thompson or Hooker either...but he seemed to be well aware of their existence.

The readership will remember that I also mentioned other whistleblowers a number of times before he acknowledged them just now...he postures now, that he wasn't aware they existed, and doesn't know who they are either.

So, if that is the case, then apparently it is actually he, who in fact does not read...and not me, as he implied.

I guess he thought it good strategy to accuse me of it first.

I submit, that he knows who the other whistleblowers are, but had nothing bad to say about them.

As his feet sink deeper into the tar baby the more he struggles.

How many times do you want to misread something?  Hooker is not a whistleblower.  He doesn't work for the CDC.

 

I don't work in government, but i blew the whistle on a number of them...and they did put me on their naughty list of people to do.

And its worth mentioning that the CDC wasn't the only accused party.

However Thompson believed Hooker's poor analysis.  As for other people that you claim are CDC whistleblowers.   You're going to have to tell me who they are before I tell you  whats wrong (or right) with your position.

I guess he really doesn't read...now suddenly he's conceding that they may have some relevant testimony to give, damaging to the CDC.

According to the thread transcript, I didn't name Thompson or Hooker either...but he seemed to be well aware of who THEY were.

The readership will remember that I also mentioned other whistleblowers a number of times before he acknowledged them just now...he postures now, that he wasn't aware they existed, and doesn't know who they are either. "


According to the thread transcript, I didn't name Thompson or Hooker either...but he seemed to be well aware of their existence.

Right now I'm talking about vaccines.

Yes, lets do ignore the fact that essentially he's advising people to buy their medicine from they guy who tried to poison them last week.

After I cure you of your crazy I'd be more than happy to talk about your other problems.  This isn't sidestepping it's focusing on the issue being discussed.

Well endowed...witty...helpful...Patent holder.

I can use words that describe also...i just don't project those descriptors on to others.

What you are doing is often referred to as "moving the goalposts".

Or pointing out the obvious.


Either vaccines are, in and of themselves demonstrably and significantly harmful or they are not.  I say "not" you seem to say they "are".  We don't need to talk about chemtrails or bat boy or ruined temples on the face of mars to make that point.

I'm reminded how the "Reverend" Ted Haggart usta hurl all his condemnations on gay people, proclaiming eternal damnation...and then how he got caught with a gay escort and buying meth to enhance his guilty trystful pleasure.

Regards...

I'm reminded how the "Reverend" Ted Haggart usta hurl all his condemnations on gay people, proclaiming eternal damnation...and then how he got caught with a gay escort and buying meth to enhance his guilty trystful pleasure.

Regards...

You really just can not help yourself.  In a topic on vaccines, you are talking about gay escorts.  That makes a lot of sense to no one except yourself.

Bill

You really just can not help yourself.  In a topic on vaccines, you are talking about gay escorts.  That makes a lot of sense to no one except yourself.

Bill

*shows Groom of the Stool the lavatory*