Hi,
Because previous video about "Charging Battery with Reactive Power" was not good enough
I made new , better one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXUISuI1jCg
All The Best,
Milan

 to TinselKoala
But I am fat  guy and you are not

Guys, seems that you did not understand the point
You are talking about voltage  step up conversion, but I do  not

to Cangas:
It was not hubris, but  could be crap as you said 
My comment  was addressed to TinesKoala and Tito. Not to everybody .
Because they are talking about voltage step up conversion.
What I am saying that  power input 10 V x 1A to charge the  12V battery is more efficient than 13.5 or 15.5  x 1 A.
It means  no step up or step down conversion, the same current from the  source  and the same current  to battery.
I hope that it is  more clear now.

MileHigh,
thanks for your comment. I have been surprise  also with  some comment from some meber and did not react much.
Your suggestion  about tittle is very good and I will change it right now.
Regarding  what I said about current and joules .
You are right that we can not separate  voltage and cuurent, they goes together. What I said is not my statements , it is  from electro chemistry . Maybe I did not formulate it well  even I tried to explain it with single cell of electrolyser. 
Let is try it again. If  will look any law , any formula in electro chemistry . all of them are related to number of coulombs  or amps,. Because they (coulombs or amps) making deposit on cathode and oxidation on anode. So no voltage in all formulas  about this subject. But we need voltage of course. It tell us that we can use  any voltage range (from minimum needed voltage to above)
the work will be determined by passing current.
I will use electrolytic cell for example again.
By Faraday law we know that 96485 Coulombs is needed to liberate 1 gram of mas on electrode.

Imagine that we have cell with two stainless electrodes inside of  20 % NaOH solution.
Breaking voltage of NaOH solution is 1.69 V, plus overvoltage (supertension) of electrodes gives minimum operating voltage about 2 V. So we have MINIMUM input voltage which is 2 Volts .
The current depends of distance between electrodes, size of electrodes and type of solution and input voltage.
I already said that 2 V input will be minimum voltage input, under it, the cell will works like capacitor.
By  calculation  we can see that about 1.6 Amps (formula do not ask for voltage value) is needed to get one liter of Hydrogen /oxygen mixture for one hour.
 So if we tune distance between two electrodes in cell to draw 1.6 amp at 2 Volts input we will get 1 liter og  gas for one hour.
It gives 2 x 1.6= 3.2  Joules or Watts hour.
Next .. if we distance electrodes each other  too much, the current will drops  for the same voltage input. Now we need to find which voltage input will gives 1.6 Amps  between electrodes.
Let say that this new voltage valuse is 3.4 V
We have  now 3.4 x 1.6= 5.44 Joules of Watts hour to get ONE liter of gas.
So  gas production is the SAME because it is related to Amps not to Joules
But there are losses in this case. Amps makes Joules Heat which we can calculate by formula E(heat)= R x I^2 
It tell us that distanced electrodes will produces  more heat than close electrodes, but gas production will be the same.
It is the same for the battery, because  the same process is happen inside of them.
So if we go back to video which I made , it tell us that lover voltage input will be more efficient than higher voltage input. Battery to be charged from  starting Capacity  stage to 100 % Capacity needs  X amount of coulombs . If you make it with 10V RMS will be lower energy input than if you make with 14.4 or 15.5 V input.
But as  I said in video , you need longer time to do that with 10 V RMS than with 14.4 V RMS.
I am using this charger if I am not in a hurry.

All The Best,

MileHigh,
Yes, in all physics we simplify process when we are trying to explain. But in reality they are  very, very complex.
The same is with  electro-chemistry, Faraday's law of electrolysis, charging batteries etc.
If you had chance to look my video about Tesla's Radiant Energy 5, you will see that things are not simple. Depends how we treat the  cell /cells (electrolysers or batteries) different products comes out of this.
Thanks again.
Milan

to Cangas:
It was not hubris, but  could be crap as you said 
My comment  was addressed to TinesKoala and Tito. Not to everybody .
Because they are talking about voltage step up conversion.
What I am saying that  power input 10 V x 1A to charge the  12V battery is more efficient than"  13.5 or 15.5  x 1 A.
It means  no step up or step down conversion, the same current from the  source  and the same current  to battery.
I hope that it is  more clear now.

Mancha....I have a SMALL budget available for non-essential expenses.

When I say "computer" or "computer system" that includes the internet connection.

My budget allows only dial-up internet connection.

Dial-up is famously SLOW.

Use of roughly a half dozen different different dial-up connections across 10 years have proved to me that downloading and viewing Youtube stuff is futile. It demands much more time than I can devote to it, and most often fails to complete anyway.

I have become increasingly frustrated at posters who only provide a Youtube URL and fail to give any written description of their grand idea. It really leaves me out of the loop.

When you leave me out of the loop because I cannot pay for faster computer system performance, that means that I am being considered 2nd class.

Considering me 2nd class means that you (generically speaking) consider yourself better class than me, therefore the reference to the word "hubris".


CANGAS 91



 

I was talking about DOWNLOADING Youtube videos. On my dial-up connection which is all I can afford.

CANGAS 92

i use http://www.clipconverter.cc , java must active, vid can be converted and be downloaded in many different format. then watch off line many time. but ads are annoying..   idm or fdm can help also.
problem solved .

seems MH can not look a thing in different angle, it's always him..