Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Gravity powered devices => Gravity powered devices => Topic started by: ARMCORTEX on September 02, 2014, 08:50:18 PM

Title: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 02, 2014, 08:50:18 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_Z1S_1GlxA&list=UUNvxm6pTplRsUUOPEuDM8eg

I restart this thread, because the grumage thread is too big, and his replication not according to observed video.

I believe I have solved these devices, and will refer to them as kinetic oscillators, they simply are a form of pulse magnetic motor, but with pulleys.

But not like Bedini, this is like ideal magnetic situation, tangantial and shielded, so dollar for dollar it is in fact superior technique.

The trick revolves around pulley squeeze  by hidden eccentric or on a hidden eccentric on floating bouncy wheel and any variation thereof.

It is not complicated.

This video of turkey and the video of Chas Campbell indicates to me that the Lead out theory is real, wich is approved by mainstream now

The machine works by barely noticeable lobe on the yellow reflector, wich causes pulley squeeze and pulling, read my analysis back in this thread.

http://www.overunity.com/14655/1939-gravity-power-multiply-power-by-1200/450/#.VAYUivldV8E

Thus creating pulses of tangantial force, and this causes OU when right freq is hit, and this depends on load.

http://www.filedropper.com/dissection ( my dissection of chas campbell)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgk0HfXhU9M

Now by reading this, you understand better the Device of future industrial factories, kapanadze device cannot compete.

I will fight now fight anybody who disagree with my theories and refer to them as lowly minds.
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: zoelra on September 03, 2014, 12:43:15 AM
A good example of a horizontally pulsed-wheel is shown in the video below.  It is worth a look.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhwQt1tJYa8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhwQt1tJYa8)


The Lead-out theory presented by Mr. Lawrence Tseung is very easy to understand and should be easy to build and verify.  My concern is after publishing his theory many years ago, he has NOT been able to convince the scientific establishment of it's validity and to my knowledge there are no running devices using this principle ... odd for such a simple idea ...
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 03, 2014, 01:02:11 AM
That is a technique, but I like pulley better.

That is good short pulse tho.

Why do you say there is not much proof, I can count 5 devices of pulse pulley arrangement, perhaps more in eastern europe.

It is clear that there is proof.

Chas Cambell had legitimate device.

If you wanna fight me , you know what my response will be. I will use the L word.

Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 03, 2014, 01:17:07 PM
My question: Lawrence I have a question for you.
 
Would it be easier to pulse a wheel with 4 x  (or 2 x) heavy weights and light frame , or a totally uniform mass distribution flywheel with no definite ''frequency'', an infinite number of small pendulums so to speak. While a 4 x mass point could have 1 tapping  (or 2) per weight, as they accelerate already. I have an idea for program controllable hammer like kinetic pulser, not magnet, but blunt mass with retractable high strenght steel solenoid tip.

You say ''to pulse @ wrong time a pendulum is counter productive''. How to identify right time with uniform flywheel ? Would it be simpler to design a stick flywheel with 2 weights @ tips ?

His answer

The easiest experiment to determine the right frequency for a swing is shown in the Milkovic 2 stage pendulum.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8
 
If you have an unbalanced wheel, you can pulse it at different rotational speeds.  In the case of the Tong wheel, we determined the best pulsing time experimentally.   The device was adjsted until the current reading was minimum. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8
 
We did not experiment with uniform flysheel.

conclusion: Lawrence doesnt know the answer, too many variables, technique must be done in a way that its adjustable vs its load,thus clever build planification.

But, it is very pertinent, to be able to calculate or estimate necessary force, I ish to have a excel sheet one day, that will help me design rotationg pulsers.
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 03, 2014, 07:29:03 PM
Looking @ the chas campbell video, he does seem to have something that looks like capacitors, to create a jerk, as shown by grumage.

This is speculation, it could be stock as well. But probably mismatched on purpose.

More powerful and sharp the pulse the better, only frequency can be offbeat.

But that is only half the story, rest is the tension bouncing, as we can see. So it is a deliberate pulser.

We know, that with a constant load, a constant beat is needed, as shows wonderfully the water wheel video, this is good to know.
But as he say, he had to play with the  belt ratio, to find the right torque load.

Reminds me of LC problem, you use the formula to know what bandwidth you need, by anticipation then get proper equipment.

Anticipation, forward thinking, caracteristics, formula. All is classic engineering.

So the next question, wich no one seems to have an answer to, in any book. Is how does geometrical arrangement of flywheel vs its load play on the frequency that is needed to gain the Lead in energy ? I guess Lawrence hides from us important math.

Or is it totally a quetion of energy rates, and not geomety ?

It is an important question to ask.

Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 04, 2014, 05:50:59 PM
The info in this post was why the site got shut down yesterday.

Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 04, 2014, 08:08:54 PM
As a cherry on top, these profound concepts and redesigns I gathered from various inventors who I respect dearly.

But, my favorite is pulse wheels.

Gravity devices have been done in many formats, many techniques, always interesting.

A few to the point non stupid people who will see logic will cheat peasant's destiny, this is called survival of the peasants.

I will open donations line, so that old or injured or incapable people who cant build these can donate to me, and I will work for them.

https://www.youtube.com/user/Skyrimninjamod/videos




Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ramset on September 04, 2014, 09:17:47 PM
ArmChair


Why you hurting Turkeys...?


I thought you were a nice Man??


Chet
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 04, 2014, 10:15:22 PM
Thincrust, deserved a good smacking.

And you, rat, are not an elite peasant like me.

You can crawl back to your shitty inferior threads.

Discussing concepts I discarded as shit long ago.

Scram!



Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ramset on September 05, 2014, 12:14:42 AM
ArmPit


working with Turkeys has made you Fowl..

you use to be such a nice guy??


I brought you a present

*** this link yields raw data which needs to be manually searched by the user [links no longer connect]
take the time to search some of these names and patents and you will see where we are going with this....


https://sites.google.com/site/braxpeace2/waterinfuelblends (https://sites.google.com/site/braxpeace2/waterinfuelblends)


there will be a very nice announcement on this topic in the coming days.....


Water as Fuel   8)


thx
Chet
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: zoelra on September 05, 2014, 12:24:38 AM
ARMCORTEX wrote:

Why do you say there is not much proof, I can count 5 devices of pulse pulley arrangement, perhaps more in eastern europe.

It is clear that there is proof.  Chas Cambell had legitimate device.



Sure there are plenty of inventors making claims of having runners, but I am not aware of any device that has been certified as a runner by independent and legitimate investigators.  If you can name a few, we can run those names/devices by the members on the Bessler Wheel forum for a fact check.
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: TinselKoala on September 05, 2014, 12:31:24 AM
You are too late.

Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 05, 2014, 12:35:46 AM
I will now terrorize the LLLLLLLLLowwwwly minds in this thread.

Obliterate, destroy, all doubters will be destroyed.

grrrrrrrrrraaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 05, 2014, 02:25:19 AM
ArmPit


working with Turkeys has made you Fowl..

you use to be such a nice guy??


I was never a nice guy, I am evil, an evil genius.

But I will be nicer if you

1. venerate and agree with my theories
2. give me free money for my projects

then, one day, I will do the ultimate nice thing to you and give you OU. Not because I like you, but because I am the best.
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ramset on September 05, 2014, 03:09:46 AM
your theory or Larry's ?


So your working on the "Lead the money outa my bank acc't,  and lead it  into yours" Theory ??


gettin ant bites??


btW
Some fellows think this Pulse the wheel idea [AKA the sneaky bump in the belt]
has legs....


thx
Chet



Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 05, 2014, 03:57:36 AM
Yeah, its the theory of Lawrence.

I agree with that :)

But that is beyond the essence of this thread, I have payed my respects, sufficiently, by thanking the unnammed inspirations.

I am here to debate the implementation of this.

So you say something about a leg, if you have some observation about chas campbell device, share it, so that I may see the video
and judge if it makes sense.
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on September 05, 2014, 06:07:23 AM
Adding an hidden eccentric on the wheel, and if this wheel was somewhat free floating and trapped between pulleys elasticity.

Would cause additional translation bounce.

But as I have said in the dissection,nit could bounce if well balanced, just a hidden cavity, replaced by.

It's actually a good technique to me that chas is doing, there's not a zillion ways to do this.
Title: Re: Breakthrough: Lead out theory in Chas Campbell and turkey device
Post by: ARMCORTEX on December 02, 2014, 07:21:47 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm1UK-5-AD4

following the trend of success of flywheel arrangement.

a variation of the technique ?