Quote frm tinselkoala  :' the magnet stops moving wrt the coil, there will be no current produced. If a magnetic vortex existed, and was oriented properly wrt the coil, then there should be current produced even when the magnet itself is stationary wrt the coil. 

There are a myriad of different experimental situations that would show a magnetic vortex _if it existed_. None of them do. There are a few situations where improper interpretations of limited observed data could be twisted... no pun intended!... to mean a magnetic vortex exists.'

Unquote

Let's say there was existence of helical movement,depending on the speeds the diode would have to be pretty suited to handle that frequency to divide the peaks I guess.I've done experiments with suspended colloidal sulfur in paramagnetic ion (iron sulfate) solutzi before and observed patterns of movement via laser pointer but it was due to environmental heat as opposed to movement of magnetic fields on the neo I reckon

Quote frm tinselkoala:  'what if a magnetic vortex is moving so fast you can't detect it moving by any means... what then?'

Unquote

Here's a question for you mr tinselkoala: if a copper wire is orientated at a certain angle in a static magnetic field,will it itself act as diode ie.let electricity pass easier one way than the other

So if the wire is held dead-stationary then we get bias.this static voltage should register on the oscilloscopes.basicly like shoving a field near an electron-gas in a container.going to cause a constant pressure differential

Quote frm pinestone'you can affect a change to the conductor and see on a scope or even in a plasma only if you move the magnet'

Or the current.won't the random movements of electrons in the conductor bias toward one direction? Perhaps a massive impendance voltmeter or pico-ampmeter is better to check for this than oscilloscope? It was loschmidt who caused a scene a hundred years ago with his column of air in a pipe affected by gravity.gas molecules accelerate downward and deccelerate upwards giving detectable temperature,pressure(barometer) gradient

Here are links to Magnet vortex papers ...

Acca.....
 http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140430/ncomms4760/full/ncomms4760.html
 
For example, in a magnetic disc with a radius of just 500 nanometers (billionths of a meter) and a thickness of just 25 nanometers,

the disc can no longer support multiple domains and the spins align in a hurricane-like rotational pattern to reduce the overall magnetic energy.



The spins parallel to the disc's surface rotate around a core, much like the eye of the hurricane,
 either clockwise or anticlockwise.

And at the core, the magnetic spins point out of the disc's surface, either up or down.

So this structure, a magnetic vortex, has four possible states—up or down paired with clockwise or anticlockwise.
 

Quote frm acca:'as vortices are moved apart, pinning effects begin to dominate, and the peak frequency is no longer singular. Micromagnetic simulations are utilized to further elucidate the coupled behavior and obtain time-resolved information of the dynamic process.'

So how would one harness this effect @acca.I'm getting rather frightening results in an experiment I'm now doing with semiconductors.it appears the hall effect(magneto-resistance) was what I was looking for earlier today.

 Here is the edited version of the results that show proof that the free energy is in fact a decay of Iron, being that the ferrite core will “sing” or being pulsed at a very high frequency to induce energy generation..  It looks like free energy is some type of a Nuclear decay.. So be careful as Wesley and his team found out 3 years ago ..
 
Acca…
 
http://newnuclear.altervista.org/
 
 
Experimental Results by A. Petrucci
Pubblicato il febbraio 2, 2009
 
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

 
The results presented in this paper show that the only application of mechanical compressions like ultrasounds can induce nuclear effects (like neutron emission) in stable nuclides.
 
 
In the last years, we carried out five experiment sessions during which we collected evidences of anomalous production of intermediate and high mass number nuclides like iron.
 
The evidences of neutron emissions collected during the last 4 years were achieved by different measuring techniques: passive ones, track detectors, and active ones like the electronic detectors.
 
All of these measuring tools agreed in showing the presence of emitted neutrons. In this sense, the whole of these evidences can be considered a deep and sound proof of the reality of a new physical phenomenon, namely some sort of nuclear activity (still completely unknown) of stable elements with high Coulomb barrier induced by mechanical pressure.
 
On the theoretical side these outcomes indicate new perspectives on our established theoretical understanding of fundamental interactions. On this issue, we notice that mechanical compressions of stable elements usually affect the outer electronic shells of atoms whose dimension lies in the range of 10^-10 m and whose energy is of the order of 10 eV.
 
In other words, electromagnetic force is the fundamental interaction to pilot mechanical compressions.
 
On the other hand, however, we have a neutron radiation that can only come from within the nucleus whose dimension lies in the range of 10^-15 m, whose energy is in the range of tens or hundreds of MeV and whose stability is controlled by the hadronic and leptonic fundamental interactions.
 
The outcomes of these experiments showed that, despite the spatial and energetic gaps, the electromagnetic force could induce measurable nuclear effects like neutron emission in stable nuclides. Of course, having to do with Iron and its Coulomb barrier, it is not reasonable to think of a nanoscale thermonuclear fusion since the temperature needed to overcome the barrier would be in the order of 10¹⁰ - 10¹² Kelvin.
 
Moreover Iron nucleus is the first that does not release energy during fusion but needs to be supplied with energy if we want to obtain fusion from it.
 
Andrea Petrucci.

It is obvious that there  are trolls who do  any thing to throw off the insightful thinking about magnetvortex and spinwaves by spinning half truths to their own agenda what that may be .. Pun intended…

These trolls are not your friends but are disinformation agents who get money to post per programmed  agendas of some dogmatic science belief, “religion of  science “..

Here is the real truth MAGNETVORTEX SPIN WAVES EXIST AND ARE REAL !! 

Now watch as the trolls will spin this again.. I just makes me sick !!! 



Acca…   



Harnessing Magnetic Vortices for Making Nanoscale Antennas 
 
April 30, 2014

http://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=11635
 
 
 
The secret to harnessing spin is to control its evolution and spin configuration.


 "If you grab a circular refrigerator magnet and place it under a microscope that could image electron spins, you would see the magnet has several regions called domains,

where within each domain all the spins point in the same direction," explained group leader Yimei Zhu.

 "If you were to shrink that magnet down to a size smaller than a red blood cell, the spins inside the magnet will begin to align

themselves into unique spin textures."[/font]

You are calling me a troll? Now I remember why I stayed off of this forum for 5 years. It's because of people like you who have no clue what they are reading and do not even understand the basics of magnetism. Your references are not utilizing static magnetic fields, they are for the most part using radio frequencies (RF) or decaying nuclear isotopes which make WAVES.
Good luck with your research using flawed thinking and your developmental processes.