Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

movieclipsfree

movie clips free

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 482515
  • *Total Topics: 14223
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 106
  • *Total: 111

Facebook

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos  (Read 618134 times)

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #60 on: July 16, 2014, 03:27:51 AM »
Question-Is this vortex stationary,or dose it rotate/in motion ?.


reciprocation and rotation are necessitated.   The angles and rate of precession are mentioned in the book.

Definitionally a "stationary vortex" isnt / cannot be a vortex, rather would be a CONE.    No such creature exists.


Electrostatic charged pyrolytic dusted-graphite in mineral oil shows BOTH the centripetal and centrifugal vortex.

microbeading ferrofuild in 100% isopropyl alcohol shows the increasing (to center point) centripetal vortex in live-motion.

and another device I am in the works, which works best, of getting a patent on, works better than all of them.

I am presenting another video demo of the same vortex using a dangerous 6 inch by 2" neodymium.   That video is in the works.

along with maybe 10 more videos on other points.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #61 on: July 16, 2014, 03:32:34 AM »
There is no Bloch wall in a bar magnet or in a disk magnet!  lol


What you think is a "bloch wall" is a dielectric 'flywheel' which 'drives' the entire "magnet"


However only a magnetically induced object is a genuine "magnet",   what you and others call a "magnet" is a dielectric object.



Field Incommensurability necessitates (as does anyone who knows this fact),

 that you can CUT a magnet a 100,000 times top to bottom and you will still have both "poles" (a wrong term if ever there was one) and the inertial plane.


Point inspecific self-similarity in ANY point in a 'perfect' "magnet" is field incommensurability.


Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7412
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #62 on: July 16, 2014, 04:01:24 AM »
I am not sure which Bloch wall you are referring to because I said that your run of the mill magnet has no Bloch walls.  Back to flywheels again.  An inductor is like a flywheel.  Also, a capacitor is like a flywheel.  This applies to both with respect to the energy dynamics and the two-terminal behaviour.  I agree with you that there are no actual North and South poles.  Common ground there!

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #63 on: July 16, 2014, 04:32:02 AM »
I am not sure which Bloch wall you are referring to because I said that your run of the mill magnet has no Bloch walls.


Impossible, they all do by sheer definition alone.  (see bottom picture)






Back to flywheels again.  An inductor is like a flywheel.  Also, a capacitor is like a flywheel.


Yes, what did you think a "magnet" was? ..... A capacitor bank discharge into the PRE-"magnet" increases the inter-atomic dielectric which creates the macro-magnetic values which we (dumb humans) so deem it "a magnet".





Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #64 on: July 16, 2014, 04:38:47 AM »

Impossible, they all do by sheer definition alone.  (see bottom picture)







Yes, what did you think a "magnet" was? ..... A capacitor bank discharge into the PRE-"magnet" increases the inter-atomic dielectric which creates the macro-magnetic values which we (dumb humans) so deem it "a magnet".


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #64 on: July 16, 2014, 04:38:47 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7412
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #65 on: July 16, 2014, 05:13:12 AM »
Theoria:

This guy is the real thing:

https://www.youtube.com/user/lasseviren1/videos

An interesting one from the channel:

Calculating the Magnetic Field Due to a Moving Point Charge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waTF7kjmmt8&list=UU6x7DywfEqLg-3Cg_JnyTlg

MileHigh

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #66 on: July 16, 2014, 05:39:57 AM »
Theoria:

This guy is the real thing:


Hes real to be sure, a priest of the cult of Quantum.


Now contact him and tell him to define what a FIELD is.   He cant. He has no clue.



Ive seen 6 of his videos,  100% descriptions, and 0% explanations.

The world is ripe with intelligent fools that can tell you what a magnet "does"

and utterly VOID of HOW, WHY, and WHAT.


Its divinely fitting that a describer is your hero.

He also thinks that electrons exist.  The magical (and non-existent) "discharge" particle.  ;D

That alone proves him a fool.


“Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the
‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the
magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric
Discharges, Waves and Impulses)

The idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as “a psychosis”. This encouraged
Heaviside to begin a series of writings

“Electrons as a separate, distinct entity…doesn’t really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a ‘field’.” - Dr. Steve
Biller

“Here we will dispel the "electronics nerd" concept that a capacitor stores "electrons" in its plates. Taking the pair of copper plates
as in the previous experiment, but now we have two pairs of plates, one pair of plates distant from the other pair of plates. Upon one
pair of plates is imposed an electro-static potential between them. The cube of 10-C oil is inserted between this "charged" set of plates.
This hereby establishes a dielectric field of induction within the unit cube of 10-C oil. Now we then remove this cube of oil,
withdrawing it from the space bounded by the charged pair of copper plates, and taking this unit cube of oil, it is then inserted into the
space bounded by the other uncharged pair of plates. Upon insertion it is found that the un-charged pair of plates have now in fact
become charged also. It here can be seen that a cube of dielectric induction can be carried through space, from one set of plates to
another set of plates.” – E. Dollard

Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end
of one unit line of dielectric induction.


You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their “force lines” is the
“flow of electrons”; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance. There are no discrete
particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation,
only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle
of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy
discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty
mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization;
magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge;
dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q;
‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields.


Sorry, no discharge (Unicorn) particles.    Sell that Kool Aide to the sheeple.


Trust him or you,    or  CP Steinmetz???   Tough decision on that one.  ::)


“Scientists today think deeply rather than clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
Todays scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander thru equation after equation, and eventually build a
structure which has no basis in reality.” – Nikola Tesla



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #66 on: July 16, 2014, 05:39:57 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7412
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #67 on: July 16, 2014, 05:59:06 AM »
Yeah I am familiar with the story.  You are even edging into Zipon territory.  From past experience people that argue this stuff can't solve a simple circuit.

In many cases electrons are like tumbleweeds in the wind.  The wind is like the electric field.  That's the ticket.

Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #68 on: July 16, 2014, 06:06:30 AM »
The wind is like the electric field.  That's the ticket.


Too bad you cannot define FIELD

I however can.


Wind  ehhh? , now youre just glossing the term ETHER/Aether.        How sweet that is.   


“The word Ether has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics only because its past association with opposition to
relativity. This is unfortunate because stripped of these connotations, it nicely captures the way most physicists actually thin about the
vacuum. The modern concept of vacuum space confirmed by every experiment is a relativistic Ether. But we do not call it this because
Ether is a taboo term.” - Robert B. Laughlin




All electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force (as reified by the incorrect
understanding of the definition of a ‘field’), these pressure gradients, or “lines” are contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving
motion to the terminus ‘electron’. The thermionic ‘electron’ contracts, pulling the ‘electron’, the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the
‘electron’. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, in both cases these socalled
‘electrons’ assume radial motions, with non participating pressure gradients, or forces filling the ‘voids’, directing the
‘electrons’. Hence, it is the so-called ‘electrons’ (dielectric radial discharges) that travel in straight lines, that is, radially. ‘Electrons’
have nothing to do with the flow of electricity; the so-called ‘electrons’ are the rate at which electricity is destroyed. ‘Electrons’ are in
fact the resistance. From extensive experimental work into atomic electrical science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla, it is
established that the so-called electron is only a shadow; its apparent-only physical mass is merely an electrical momentum (ejected by
the dielectric inertia in disturbance). There is no rest mass to an electron nor could there be logically, a rest-electron ‘bead’; such
notions are absurd and evidence proven non-existent. The very premise is logically impossible and contradicts the rational physics of
atomic charges and discharges.

“In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to
give an account of their nature.” “For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the
influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto
remained obscure to us.” - Einstein on electrons; “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916
There is no such condition in nature as a negatively charge particle nor could there be. Charge and discharges are opposite
conditions of a single subject, either protons or fields of movements and radiation of those same electrical fields. To claim that liquid
in a jar (charged) is one thing, and pouring that liquid from the jar (discharge) is another liquid altogether, is nonsense, likewise
compression and expansion are opposite conditions of a single subject. Compressing bodies are charging into higher potential
conditions. Conversely, expanding bodies are discharging into lower potential conditions.

“To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is
no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite
conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.” – W. Russell
Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of M. Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit. One corpuscle
terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of
what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W.
Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – E. Dollard
With the introduction of the so-called ‘electron’ by Thomson and the supposed debunking of the Ether theory, the golden age of
electrical discovery ended. Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower was demolished. His work and that of other Ether researchers fell into
disrepute. They were relentlessly attacked by mainstream science, something that continues to this day. As a result, the days of Etherdriven,
electrical discovery petered-out, finally ending around 1930. As a direct and intentional result of the academic physics theory,
the methodology behind the brilliant inventiveness of previous generations was all but wiped out and replaced by an unproductive
particle physics. This, from the cult of quantum, a fraudulent collusion and academic hubris-based pseudo-conspiracy based in “deep
thinking insanity” designed by mathematical physics.



“There is no energy in matter other than that received from its environment (as meant Ether fields).” – Nikola Tesla

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13099
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #69 on: July 16, 2014, 06:09:40 AM »
Do you see? I told you.
The Tattooed Genius cannot provide any reference for his assertion that Maxwell and Heaviside or electrical engineering texts say that "dielectricity is electrical inertia". Nor can he explain how CRT televisions work, since he denies the existence of electrons. He will have trouble describing what the electron beam guns emit, and how they can be so precisely designed by people who DO believe in electrons and who would instantly reject his silly word-salads. Nor can he use his "theory" to design anything that works in any "unconventional" manner.
So he will simply continue to post his pretty graphics and insult his betters with nonsense and diatribe. Carry on.

(He cites a 98 year old quote from Einstein.. who would have instantly understood a modern CRT television set for exactly what it is...  in an attempt to support his position. It is to laugh.)

 
Quote
One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of
what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W.
Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – E. Dollard

Eric Dollard now! This guy cracks me up over and over again. Faradic Tube of Force. Quantifies as One Coulomb. Hey, Apophis, you are on the wrong forum. You should go here, where your ideas will get the reception they truly deserve:
http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #69 on: July 16, 2014, 06:09:40 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #70 on: July 16, 2014, 06:13:27 AM »
, since he denies the existence of electrons. He will have trouble describing what the electron beam guns



Your mind doesnt work well son.   Tesla used the term electron. However he also DENIED that same was a particle.     

You've committed the fallacy of REIFICATION.


There are no electron beam guns, son.    I know EXACTLY what they emit.


The ‘electron microscope’ lie

There are no negatively "charged" particles in this universe. Negative electricity discharges while positive electricity charges. The
negative depolarizing force functions in the opposite manner and direction to the positive polarizing force.

“Always question the academic who tells you he’s manipulating particles that nobody has never witnessed. Countless particles are
created in the Atomistic religion of quantum as demonstrable redesignations of electrical and magnetic effects and fields. An entire
academic pantheon of liars is established to perpetrate this nonsense.”

"Because the SEM (scanning electron microscope) utilizes vacuum conditions and uses ‘electrons’ to form an image, special
preparations must be applied to the sample. All water must be removed from the samples because the water would vaporize in the
vacuum. All metals are conductive and require no preparation before being used. All non-metals need to be made conductive by
covering the sample with a thin layer of conductive material.
This is done by using a device called a "sputter coater”. The sputter
coater uses an electric field and argon gas. The sample is placed in a small chamber that is at a vacuum. Argon gas and an electric field
cause an ‘electron’ to be removed from the argon, making the atoms positively charged. The argon ions then become attracted to a
negatively charged gold foil. The argon ions knock gold atoms from the surface of the gold foil. These gold atoms fall and settle onto
the surface of the sample producing a thin gold coating ”


Only conductive (metal) samples are suitable for “electron” microscopy untreated, all other samples are metal treated to prevent
them from burning up in the intense dielectric beam. The resulting image is therefore of the metal coating or stain and not the original
sample! Never believe a relativist telling you he’s “shooting his electron gun”. A metal dielectric reflector of a once living organism is
not the original sample nor are there electrons scanning it.
This device in reality is a dielectric scanning reflector, which produces fine
images as only reflected off metal surfaces. The very focusing beams of these microscope are constrictor “lenses” of dielectric flux
lines.


Even the idiot Einstein understood the BS and implication of a "discharge particle" :

“In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to
give an account of their nature.” “For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the
influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto
remained obscure to us.” - Einstein on electrons; “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916



You lost that one,  NEXT






Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13099
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #71 on: July 16, 2014, 06:18:26 AM »
Wrong again, buddy boy. You can shout and moan and insult all you like, but you can't deny the existence of electron microscopes, or CRT electron beam guns! They don't actually care if you redefine them.. they are what they are and you are utterly and stupidly wrong. But your insufferable ego will never let you rest. You are the next most textbook example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Go ahead, you still haven't provided the reference for your stupid assertion about Maxwell, Heaviside, ee texts saying dielectricity is electrical inertia, and you still cannot design anything with your "theory" that can't be done with conventional electrical engineering and physics. The proof is in the DOING and you cannot do.



Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #72 on: July 16, 2014, 06:18:43 AM »
Faradic Tube of Force. Quantifies as One Coulomb.


Those were the words of JJ Thomson himself,   NOT E. Dollard.


Lost again,   insert 25 cents more and try again.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13099
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #73 on: July 16, 2014, 06:20:46 AM »

Those were the words of JJ Thomson himself,   NOT E. Dollard.


Lost again,   insert 25 cents more and try again.
Keep it up, silly boy. You are just digging yourself in deeper and deeper. Go ahead and show a MODERN REFERENCE to a "faradic tube of force" and show how it "quantifies" to one Coulomb. You cannot.

Quote
Since the charge of one electron is known to be about 1.60217657×10−19 coulombs, a coulomb can also be considered to be the charge of roughly 6.241509324×1018 electrons (or protons), the reciprocal of 1.60217657×10−19.

Go ahead, refute that.


Offline TheoriaApophasis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1471
Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #74 on: July 16, 2014, 06:22:37 AM »
conventional electrical engineering and physics. The proof is in the DOING and you cannot do.



ad hominem and baseless claims.    I retired at 32, Ive been experimenting all my life.


I didnt deny the "electron microscope" son,  only yours and others BS definition of what is being emitted.

ALL subjects in said microscope that aren't metallic, are coated in a CONDUCTOR.


Yes, as necessitated to make a dielectric imaging device.


“To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is
no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite
conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions.”

Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of M. Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit. One corpuscle
terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of
what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W.
Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.”


With the introduction of the so-called ‘electron’ by Thomson and the supposed debunking of the Ether theory, the golden age of
electrical discovery ended. Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower was demolished. His work and that of other Ether researchers fell into
disrepute. They were relentlessly attacked by mainstream science, something that continues to this day. As a result, the days of Etherdriven,
electrical discovery petered-out, finally ending around 1930. As a direct and intentional result of the academic physics theory,
the methodology behind the brilliant inventiveness of previous generations was all but wiped out and replaced by an unproductive
particle physics. This, from the cult of quantum, a fraudulent collusion and academic hubris-based pseudo-conspiracy based in “deep
thinking insanity” designed by mathematical physics.


You lost again.   Insert 25 cents more.  ;D

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos
« Reply #74 on: July 16, 2014, 06:22:37 AM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: