Check out our Youtube channel for the latest Playlists and updates:https://www.youtube.com/user/overunitydotcom/playlists?view=1&flow=grid

Coaxial Circuit that is LIGHT. Erasing nonsense of "emitting light" and the lie of "speed of light"- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VPBZfpevpI

Others may scoff at this suggestion...[of] communicat[ing] with one of our heavenly neighbors, as Mars...or treat it as a practical joke, but I have been in deep earnest about it every since I made my first observations in Colorado Springs... At the time, there existed no wireless plant other than mine that could produce a disturbance perceptible in a radius of more than a few miles. Furthermore, the conditions under which I operated were ideal, and I was well trained for the work. The character of the disturbances recorded precluded the possibility of their being of terrestrial origin, and I also eliminated the influence of the sun, moon, and Venus. As I then announced, the signals consisted in a regular repetition of numbers, and subsequent study convinced me that they must have emanated from Mars, the planet having just then been close to the earth.

It's taken me 60 odd years to gain some idea about the meaning of mass-energy equivalence and SR. I didn't ever grasp the cause of induction 'til MarkE explained it to me. What I need now is for someone to explain Kelly's diagram to me. Perhaps TinselKoala or Poynt99 or some other kind soul could enlighten me on the meaning of things like Ether field modalities etc. Thank you in anticipation, John.

"Ether Field Modalities" is the name given by an ignorant dreamer with Dunning-Kruger syndrome, to things he'd like to be able to understand but cannot, since he is blinded by his own brilliance. All you can do with "ether field modalities" is draw fancy coloured lines on graphics, which don't represent any coherent reality. There is nothing that can be engineered using these fantasy confabulations and they have no rigorous mathematical treatment underlying them. In stark contrast to the conventional physical concepts that are in everyday use and describe the principles by which things like computers, particle accelerators, and spacecraft, to name but a few, are designed and operated. But I think you know this already.

Sandang wrote:QuoteSINGLE SLIT EXPERIMENT: Part 1 Dismissing "wave particle duality" Quantum Quackery- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpcQNYa3VZ8I noticed this as the page was reloading and before your post was hidden by the Bozo Bin code, so I'll reply real quick...Wheeler yet again has discovered nothing, he's not saying anything new, he's not discrediting QM, QFT or QED (and is in fact corroborating all of them), and I suspect he's being disingenuous in his claims of discrediting QM, given that he should know that any single-slit of a width several times the wavelength will result in a diffraction interference pattern, whereas a single-slit of a width equal to or less than the wavelength will not... just as he should know that a well-defined obstruction to an electromagnetic wave acts as a secondary source, and creates a new wavefront. This new wavefront propagates into the geometric shadow area of the obstacle. The propagation of light in Quantum Field Theory actually is consistent with the very interpretation of the Huygens-Fresnel Principle.If you look at the Huygens-Fresnel Principle (this concept's been known about since 1678, expanded upon by Fresnel in 1816), you'll find that each wavelength of light interferes with itself... any point on any peak of any particular wave acts as a point of diffraction, the sum of constructive and destructive interference of all these arbitrary points of diffraction resulting in the next wave.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huygens%E2%80%93Fresnel_principlehttps://youtu.be/7CmbItRjM-Yhttps://youtu.be/T-kgoxhFSmUhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9D8cPrEAGycAs for his shining a laser against a pin, that's an inverse case of the single-slit diffraction case. It's called the Knife-Edge Effect, and is explained by the Hugyens-Fresnel Principle explained above.If people weren't so uneducated and gullible, they'd not fall for Mr. Wheeler's BS. In point of fact, the Huygens-Fresnel Principle was the forerunner of and impetus for modern quantum electrodynamics, and in fact, Einstein debated Walther Ritz on the concept, taking the stance that the Huygens-Fresnel Principle was necessary for the quantum concept of a photon.So in effect, Mr. Wheeler just corroborated Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics. Thanks for that, Mr. Wheeler. Is that not what you wanted to do? Perhaps you should think through what you're going to stomp your feet about before you start stomping.

SINGLE SLIT EXPERIMENT: Part 1 Dismissing "wave particle duality" Quantum Quackery- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpcQNYa3VZ8

An overall problem with people is they are full of dogmatic certitudes! You have to learn that first look at information not at people. That's what matter!

What is really hilarious is that no device in use today nor the Universe itself refute the existence of ether, on the contrary reinforces its existence. But this require to bend a little more on causes not on effects. On qualities not on attributes. On explanations not on descriptions. Or finally to change the reference system, to see things from another perspective.Continuing to maintain that the current scientific laws which are based on a matter which is only 99,99^10-12 from the Universe's volume, represent the rules that govern the entire Universe is a real insane. Even if we add the known fields concepts, the missing part of Universe volume is huge. So then, which situation is more hilarious? Ken's theory or current so called scientific theory that we were educated with? And which of course shape continuously the current reality, using our own minds and hands without even us to be aware of this! Can you comprehend that?- "When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense" said Leonard Susskind, professor of theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum. No, this is the wrong way. The real way is to understand the limits imposed by the "common sense" and must have the dare to go back at the origins.

In geometry and physics, the versor of an axis or of a vector is a unit vector indicating its direction.....The versors of the axes of a Cartesian coordinate system are the unit vectors codirectional with the axes of that system. Every Euclidean vector a in a n-dimensional Euclidean space (R^{n}) can be represented as a linear combination of the n versors of the corresponding Cartesian coordinate system.