Hi all,

I have found a book from Nikolaev (2003) with his EM theory. I found it in russian so I have used Google translator to get this english version, that I attach in pdf. Book: Gennady Nikolaev -

** Modern electrodynamics and the causes of its paradoxical nature. Theories, Experiments, Paradoxes** - 2003

It is curious but in some sites this books include a foreword by Stefan Marinov that I suppose that Nikolaev added to his book. I copy here the foreword by Marinov:

FOREWORD ( by Stefan Marinov ) (used by Nikolaev in his book)

(Source of the Foreword:

http://bourabai.ru/nikolaev/electro01.htm )

We will not argue, we calculate ...

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

... and measure.

Gennady Nikolaev

Gennady Nikolayev and I met at the II International Conference on space, time

and gravity in St. Petersburg in September 1991, but some of his most

interesting preprints I read a quarter of a century ago, when I lived in Bulgaria.

During the conference, we spent more time in my room at the "Leningrad" than

in the conference room, for spent Nikolaev and some other Russian physicists

experiments, which he told me were a hundred times more interesting than the

reports at the conference.

Any physics student, faced with electromagnetism, notes that there is

"something wrong", but under the influence of authority of textbooks and

professors every student tries any contradictions and absurdities "sweep under

the carpet," as all the authors of textbooks and all the professors did the same

as when they themselves were students.

My "ferment" lasted much longer, and under the influence of remarkable

experiments on electromagnetic induction Cuban physicist Francisco Muller and

my own on the measurement of the absolute velocity of the Earth, rejects the

principle of relativity and equivalence, I began to finally tempered

ikonoklastom. But I must say that, although I have several times refused the

Lorenz equations, Grassmann and again raised his flag on it, by 1991, this

equation was I firmly accepted as true.

And Nikolaev experiments showed me that in no way could be linked to the

Lorentz equation (Grassmann name will be omitted). I literally lost sleep and

rest and Nikolayev said: "Gennady, I built the whole" my "electromagnetism on

the Lorenz equations, I was able to bring his impeccable logic of mathematical

equations Coulomb and Neumann on electric and magnetic energy of two

charges, and now you show up with their experiments that they say, This

equation is not true! That restructuring, which started you in your kingdom-state,

is nothing compared the restructuring, which you cause in electromagnetism. I

find it hard to reshape my books: I'm old, I'm tired. " Nikolaev said, "The sooner

you rebuilt, the easier it will attain salvation. Do not rebuilt - do not you will be

saved!" And, back in Graz, I began to "rebuild". Again felt again the derivation of

formulas, compared with experiments. Then he repeated some of the

experiments Nicholas. The effects were the same as that described Nikolaev in

his monograph in 1986, tapped on a typewriter, which he kindly gave me. This

monograph for an improved form of the reader holds in his hands now.

Thus, the equation of Lorentz "bursting at the seams." A cylindrical magnet that

axial plane cut in half, and one half is inverted (magnetic forces make it

inverting yourself) creates a cutting plane near the magnetic field which acts on

the current longitudinal forces (according to the equation of Lorentz force, which

acts on the magnet currents always perpendicular to the latter). This field

Nikolaev called scalar magnetic field, and the above-described magnet in honor

of Siberian Nikolayev I called Siberian KOLYA (SIBERIAN COLIU - give its

English transcription, because the magnet is much more known in English

literature than in Russian). It turned out, it means: for two hundred years of

electromagnetism mankind has not noticed that, besides the magnetic field B,

which we call the vector magnetic field, there is a scalar magnetic field S. So at

the current element Idr are two forces, Lorentz and Nikolaev.

F = F_lor + F_nik = Idr x B / c + Idr S / c .

But the most interesting result, which is the scalar magnetic field is as

follows. Everyone knows that when using the first three fingers of the right hand

can be shown that if a piece of wire with sliding contacts at its ends to move in a

plane perpendicular to the magnetic field vector B in the direction perpendicular

to the wire, the current is induced in such a direction that interaction of this field

with the induced current in the leads to the inhibition of the wire. This is a wellknown

law of Lenz, the first term in the above formula gives its mathematical

justification. If, however, with only one finger right or left hand reader will try to

establish which will induce a current in a wire with sliding contacts, which he will

move in the direction of the wire in a magnetic field with a scalar S, then, to my

amazement, the reader will find that the induced current will not slow down the

movement of the wire, and will help her move. This can be called antilents

effect. Of this effect, which the reader can immediately be verified

experimentally, if at hand magnet SIBERIAN Kolya, it follows that using scalar

magnetic field can build perpetual motion. I think this will be enough to become

clear to the reader what to do Gennady Nikolayev in electromagnetism.

Express the vector magnetic field B through the electric charges q i Vi

their speed and distance from the observation point Ti is very easy, if

you enter the vector magnetic potential A, for

B = rotA = rot Sum(qi·vi/cri)

But express S in terms of qi, Vj and rj was not so easy. The formula for S, which

I proposed and which to this day has not entered into conflict with any of the

experiments I know where there is a longitudinal movement of a piece of wire or

induction currents in the longitudinal motion piece of wire, the following:

S = -divA - Sum( (qi·vi·n)(ri·n)/cri^3 )

where n = dr / dr - unit vector in the direction of the current element Idr. It is

possible that this formula should take a factor of "1/2". All I know of experiments

on longitudinal movement of the wire, including my own, are of good quality,

and yet the presence or absence of the coefficient "1/2" is not set.

I should note that the first who observed at the beginning of the century the

longitudinal motion of a piece of wire with sliding contacts, is an American

engineer Carl Hering. These effects are described in his review article in the

American Journal TRANS. AM. INST. EL.ENG., 42, 311 (1923), which I

reprinted in my journal DEUTSCHE PHYSIK, 1 (3), 41 (1992).

The last three years of my experimental and theoretical work, in addition to

efforts to launch a perpetual motion magnet SIBERIAN Kolya, were devoted to

the correct conclusion of the fundamental equations of electromagnetism, which

should replace the wrong Lorentz equation. The first equation, which I proposed

and named in honor of Nikolayev Mykolaiv equation that already contains a

scalar field S in the above form. I sent this equation Nikolaev. He spoke

critically. Taking into account the guidance of the "leader", I suggested a new

equation is called the second equation of Nikolaev. Nikolaev with this equation

as if agreed, but wrote me in a letter that equation, I suggest, should be called

by its name. Soon I will put experiments (see. DEUTSCHE PHYSIK, 3 (11), 5

(1994)), which is in contradiction with the first and second equations Nikolaev

(these names I keep to this day, because once the baby is named Ivan, the can

not be when he's a year old, began to call him Peter). Then, in late 1993, I

proposed a new equation that described by the Marinov equation. It was a

beautiful elegant equation is simple symmetrization was obtained from the

equation Grassmann, ie from the Lorenz equations, and three years I thought

this equation, all effects due to the scalar magnetic field S, which is equal to the

above value, multiplied by a factor of "1/2".The journal DEUTSCHE PHYSIK

reader will find accurate calculation of the scalar magnetic field generated by an

infinitely long cylinder and ring magnets SIBERIAN Kolya, which are the basic

elements of perpetual motion machines working on the scalar magnetic field.

But a month ago, I set up an experiment, which is in contradiction with the

Marinov equation, because this equation, in addition to the vector magnetic field

B, input, and other vector magnetic field B Mar , which in the experiments were

found.

Since the question of what should be the fundamental equation in

electromagnetism, is a matter of great importance and since I was unable to

find this equation, I announced a contest with a prize of $ 100 000. This contest

will be announced in the near future in the American Journal GALILEAN

ELECTRODYNAMICS and journal DEUTSCHE PHYSIK.

Conditions of competition are as follows:

I pay $ 100 000 to the researcher, who will offer the formula (usually scheme),

with whose help it will be possible to count the power and torque (with respect

to an arbitrary axis) that closed circuit with a current I i acts on the other closed

loop with current I or on the side of the latter, associated with the sliding

contacts rest. The money will be paid, if I'm not able to demonstrate an

experiment that would enter into conflict with this formula. If the applicant does

not agree that my "kontreksperiment" is falsifying, it may file an objection, and

editor GALILEAN ELECTRODYNAMICS should appoint a committee of three

university professors, who must decide whether or not my experiment falsifying

or not. If a majority of the Commission request that the experiment is not

falsifying, I'll pay the aforementioned amounts, and 2 000 dollars to each of the

committee members. However, if the Commission decides that the experiment

is falsifying, the applicant does not receive anything, but will have to pay for

2000 dollars to each of the professors.

I call on all Russian physicists strain minds. $ 100 000 - this is almost a Nobel

prize and will be awarded for the work, not the phantasmagoria. While task that

I set, it seems extremely simple. But it only seems that way! Otherwise 100,000

dollars out of my pocket, I would not pull out.

In concluding this preface, I can only say the following. Although Nicholas has

published many articles in Russian physics journals, his name and his

revolutionary discoveries known much more in the West (Japan include in the

"West"), than in Russia. Let us hope that the publication of this monograph will

help Russian physicists and electrical engineers to quickly understand what the

torch was lit in Siberia.

Stefan Marinov,

Director of the Institute for Fundamental Physics,

City Graz, Austria

.