Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82007
  • *Latest: EB62

  • *Total Posts: 493061
  • *Total Topics: 14499
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 150
  • *Total: 153

Facebook

Author Topic: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!  (Read 111029 times)

Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #555 on: June 30, 2014, 06:06:08 PM »
The funny thing is, that every political system has its "favourite theory". Capitalism favours theories which do not allow something for free, in all sciences, and of course specially in economics. But also "nowadays physics" stresses that nothing can be had for free.

This is another falsehood about mainstream physics and science that the general public just can't get right!  Frank Wilczek doesn't believe in the conservation of mass and doesn't believe the zeroth law is valid.  Wilczek is considered one of the world’s most eminent theoretical physicists. He is known, among other things, for the discovery of asymptotic freedom, the development of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the invention of axions, and the discovery and exploitation of new forms of quantum statistics (anyons). Frank Wilczek is a Nobel Prize Winner, and is also an official advisor to CERN and to Daedalus.

Reference: The below is taken right out of a book written by Frank Wilczek titled, "The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and Unification of the Forces". This book is a must read!  Mainstream physics has not thrown out an Ether in their theories, as the general public wrongly asserts!  This is another false-hood about mainstream physicists that the general public can't get right!

At the Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP), which operated at the CERN laboratory near Geneva through the 1990s, electrons and positrons (anti electrons) were accelerated to velocities within about one part in a hundred billionth of the speed of light. Speeding around in opposite directions, the particles smashed into each other, producing a lot of debris. A typical collision might produce ten π mesons, a proton, and an anti-proton. Now let’s compare the total masses, before and after:

electron + positron: 2 × 10–28 gram
10 pions + proton + anti-proton: 6 × 10–24 gram

What comes out weighs about thirty thousand times as much as what went in. If mass is not conserved—and it’s not!, then we can seek its origin.

Question: If E = mc2, then mass is proportional to energy. So if energy is conserved according to the mass-energy equation, doesn’t that mean that mass will be conserved, too?

Answer: The short answer is that E = mc2 really applies only to isolated bodies at rest. It’s a pity that this equation, the equation of physics that is best known to the general public, is actually a little cheesy. In general, when you have moving bodies, or interacting bodies, energy and mass aren’t proportional. E = mc2 simply doesn’t apply. E = mc2 holds for isolated bodies at rest. For moving bodies, the correct mass-energy equation is given in the image below, where v is the velocity. For a body at rest (v = 0), this becomes E = mc2. When a body, for example, a proton or an electron, is accelerated, v generally changes, but m stays the same. Therefore, the equation tells us, E changes. If energy is conserved according to the mass-energy equation, but mass is not, then what gives?

Conservation of energy applies to systems, not to individual bodies. The total energy of a system of bodies includes contributions from both energy of motion and “potential energy” terms that reflect the interactions among the bodies. The potential energy terms are given by other formulas, which depend on the distances between the bodies, their electric charges, and perhaps other things. It is only the total energy that is conserved according to the mass-energy equation.

An isolated body has a constant velocity. That’s Newton’s first law of motion, which, unlike his zeroth law, still appears to be valid. When a body is isolated, we can regard it as a system unto itself. So the energy of the body should be conserved and from the formula, it is. Conversely, when a body’s velocity changes, that very change is a signal that the body is not isolated. Some other body has to be acting on it to produce the change in velocity. The action of one body on another generally transfers energy between them. Only the total energy is conserved according to the mass-energy equation, not the energy of each body separately.

We considered a dramatic violation of conservation of mass. An electron and a positron annihilate, and out come a collection of particles whose total mass is 30,000 times larger. Nevertheless, energy is conserved. The velocities of the initial electron and positron were very close to the speed of light. Therefore, according to the general mass-energy equation, their energy is very large, much larger than mc2. The particles that emerge from the collision, although they are more massive, move a bit more slowly. When you add up their energies, calculated using the mass-energy equation, the sum matches the total energy of the original electron and positron. Once the particles fly out and separate, the interaction, or potential, energy becomes negligibly small.

Gravock

Side Note:  Now, since we have a dramatic violation in the conservation of mass according to the mass-energy equation, and mass is undergoing expansion acceleration and is provided by different equations, then energy isn't conserved either.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #556 on: June 30, 2014, 06:53:05 PM »
....
.........
Question: If E = mc2, then mass is proportional to energy. So if energy is conserved according to the mass-energy equation, doesn’t that mean that mass will be conserved, too?

Answer: The short answer is that E = mc2 really applies only to isolated bodies at rest. It’s a pity that this equation, the equation of physics that is best known to the general public, is actually a little cheesy. In general, when you have moving bodies, or interacting bodies, energy and mass aren’t proportional. E = mc2 simply doesn’t apply. E = mc2 holds for isolated bodies at rest. For moving bodies, the correct mass-energy equation is given in the image below, where v is the velocity. For a body at rest (v = 0), this becomes E = mc2. When a body, for example, a proton or an electron, is accelerated, v generally changes, but m stays the same. Therefore, the equation tells us, E changes. If energy is conserved according to the mass-energy equation, but mass is not, then what gives?
......
.............
Gravock


Mass increasing as an object approaches the speed of light is another false-hood promoted by the general public because they can't get the basic elementary truths of a theory correct, so one false-hood leads to a greater false-hood and so on.  And then, the general public wrongly and falsely asserts that it is the mainstream physicists which are the loonies and not themselves.  Give me a break!

Gravock


Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #557 on: June 30, 2014, 09:26:04 PM »
Trivial things which can be easily observed are of course described correctly. But the "fringe" is always pure politics or ideology.

Are you serious?  As one of my foes on this forum correctly stated, trivial things such as "the idea of light being something that travels from A to B is the unfortunate result of preconceptions based upon tests that really does not prove anything but a time differential between "light source" and receptor.  As soon as mankind realizes that there is no such thing as light speed or physical matter or objective time, or even a linear universe, we will move into next level of understanding".  It's really too bad he has aligned himself with the adversary of God!  Mankind hasn't been able to correctly describe even the trivial things of this world which can be observed, as you wrongly and falsely asserted.  We can't even get past the basic elementary truths of this universe!

1 Corinthians 1:27  But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise....

Gravock

Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #558 on: July 01, 2014, 09:10:31 AM »
First this so-called science should be rebuilt from scratch by competent scientists (how many do you think there are out there?).
Then we could see what the new theories say about the universe.

Or, should we see what the "old interpretations" of a theory says about the universe.  Pilot-wave theory makes all the same predictions as the probabilistic formulation of quantum mechanics (which wouldn’t be referred to as the “Copenhagen” interpretation until the 1950s), but without the ghostliness or mysterious collapse.  It is the Copenhagen probabilistic interpretation of QM I do not agree with.  The old, deterministic alternative of QM is not mentioned in most textbooks and most people in the field haven’t heard of it. Sheldon Goldstein, a professor of mathematics, physics, and philosophy at Rutgers University and a supporter of pilot-wave theory, blames the “preposterous” neglect of the theory on “decades of indoctrination.”  At this stage, Goldstein and several other noted researchers risk their careers by questioning quantum orthodoxy.  The physicist David Bohm resurrected pilot-wave theory in a modified form in 1952, with Einstein’s encouragement, and made clear that it did work, but it never caught on.  The theory is also known as de Broglie-Bohm theory, or Bohmian mechanics.  Please remember, according to David Bohm, the one who resurrected pilot-wave theory in a modified form in 1952, also says the entire universe is a hologram.

By 1932, when the Hungarian-American mathematician John von Neumann claimed to have proven that the probabilistic wave equation in quantum mechanics could have no “hidden variables” (that is, missing components, such as de Broglie’s particle with its well-defined trajectory), pilot-wave theory was so poorly regarded that most physicists believed von Neumann’s proof without even reading a translation.  More than 30 years would pass before von Neumann’s proof was shown to be false, but by then the damage was done.  Later, the Northern Irish physicist John Stewart Bell went on to prove a seminal theorem that many physicists today misinterpret as rendering hidden variables impossible.  But Bell supported pilot-wave theory. He was the one who pointed out the flaws in von Neumann’s original proof.  And in 1986 he wrote that pilot-wave theory “seems to me so natural and simple, to resolve the wave-particle dilemma in such a clear and ordinary way, that it is a great mystery to me that it was so generally ignored.”  The neglect continues to this day.....

Now at last, pilot-wave theory may be experiencing a minor comeback — at least, among fluid dynamicists. “I wish that the people who were developing quantum mechanics at the beginning of last century had access to these experiments,” Milewski said. “Because then the whole history of quantum mechanics might be different.”  The experiments began a decade ago, when Yves Couder and colleagues at Paris Diderot University discovered that vibrating a silicon oil bath up and down at a particular frequency can induce a droplet to bounce along the surface. The droplet’s path, they found, was guided by the slanted contours of the liquid’s surface generated from the droplet’s own bounces — a mutual particle-wave interaction analogous to de Broglie’s pilot-wave concept.

The photon carries momentum. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that it is not possible to measure location and momentum at the same time. If the momentum is distributed throughout the entire volume, if one measures the entire momentum, the whole volume must be considered. Since the volume spreads all over creation, it is impossible to say that it is located at a point.  It seems that the meaning of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be reinterpreted to support the present conclusion of the nature of the photon. If it has aperture and length, the momentum is not located at a single point. If a single point is assumed for the structure, no momentum can be measured. It seems that the significance of the uncertainty principle has been highly overrated.  The Heisenberg uncertainty principle simply says that the photon has volume.  Calculation shows that the energy and thus the mass is distributed uniformly throughout the structure. The same fact applies to the distribution of momentum.  Quantum indeterminacy and a probabilistic universe based on the wrong assumptions of the Copenhagen interpretation has been proven false!

"The old has been made new again"

Reference:  Fluid Experiments Support Deterministic “Pilot-Wave” Quantum Theory (Snapshots shown below)

Gravock


Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #559 on: July 01, 2014, 11:10:48 PM »
The funny thing is, that every political system has its "favourite theory". Capitalism favours theories which do not allow something for free, in all sciences, and of course specially in economics. But also "nowadays physics" stresses that nothing can be had for free.

Reference:  Time Crystals - Perpetual Motion Test Could Amend Theory of Time  (snapshots below)

Mainstream physicists are trying to build a perpetual motion machine that doesn't consume or produce energy by using "time crystals"!


Wilczek's equations indicate atoms can indeed form a regularly repeating lattice in time, returning to their initial arrangement only after discrete (rather than continuous) intervals, thereby breaking the symmetry of time.  Without consuming or producing energy, time crystals would be stable, in what physicists call their “ground state,” despite cyclical variations in structure that scientists say can be interpreted as perpetual motion.  Frank Wilczek is also a professor at MIT.

Gravock

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #559 on: July 01, 2014, 11:10:48 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #560 on: July 02, 2014, 03:09:26 AM »
Reference:  Non-local Universe – Reality as a Dream (snapshots below)

Only a very small minority of physicists understand that Bell’s proof and Aspect’s experiments mean the world itself has been discovered to be non-local!  The universe itself is not composed of space, because space implies distance, and distance is an illusion as are all the dimensions we live in by sheer virtue of the property of non-locality.

Gravock

Offline gauschor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #561 on: July 02, 2014, 08:15:03 PM »
That article was an interesting read. Especially comparing dreams and reality.

I asked myself recently: when you dream you can often see other people acting in your dream. They are holographic projections from the subconsciousness, says the article... but could these entities act on their own? Could they have a mind of their own within the dream? If yes... then maybe we (mankind) could be in a dream too, and only be projections of a mastermind who is dreaming. Once the mastermind wakes up - we are all gone. Instantly.

However the article speaks of that we altogether create the reality in which we exist. It still seems it needs a lot of mindpower to make something exist in this reality. It's not as simple as saying "this wall is not here... I project a hole into the wall now". We are somehow bound to a prison that has more power than our mind. Though I recall to have read somewhere, that if enough people believe and project that there is a hole in the wall - then it could actually happen!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #561 on: July 02, 2014, 08:15:03 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #562 on: September 01, 2017, 12:30:51 AM »
Irrational numbers are a logic error: Flat Earth Math

This means there can be no perfect circles in nature and pi = 4 in Kinematics.

Gravock

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2125
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #563 on: September 01, 2017, 01:08:00 AM »
                               Really ?
   Imagina a perfect sphaere,360° round !
             22/7 kinematic relativity perfekt

Now this perfekt vody is entering the gravity zone from an
white or black whole,the body is becoming oval,changing the format then to a staff-like body:
the body is deformated but pi as relativity number ever intakt
up to the moment that the body could become divided and the volume/mass get a change/risc to differ from
 the basic "perfect 360° body".

        Do not illusionate (yourself) with unlogical examples.

                  MENGENLEHRE/KYBERNETIK:
when there is the possibility of the existence from Result=( )
why should not irrational numbers be seen asm"living and internal growing numbers" = artificial -sensual- life/live

  "  e+pi+log - ical " a.2mm b.4mm c.8mm .... a1. ...   
    from zero (flash-bigbang) to infinity/indefinit growing

One part from old scholastics meant that pi=3 =TRINITY
other believed in the  3in1,schisma as consequence.

Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #564 on: September 01, 2017, 03:18:45 AM »
                               Really ?
   Imagina a perfect sphaere,360° round !
             22/7 kinematic relativity perfekt

Now this perfekt vody is entering the gravity zone from an
white or black whole,the body is becoming oval,changing the format then to a staff-like body:
the body is deformated but pi as relativity number ever intakt
up to the moment that the body could become divided and the volume/mass get a change/risc to differ from
 the basic "perfect 360° body".

        Do not illusionate (yourself) with unlogical examples.

                  MENGENLEHRE/KYBERNETIK:
when there is the possibility of the existence from Result=( )
why should not irrational numbers be seen asm"living and internal growing numbers" = artificial -sensual- life/live

  "  e+pi+log - ical " a.2mm b.4mm c.8mm .... a1. ...   
    from zero (flash-bigbang) to infinity/indefinit growing

One part from old scholastics meant that pi=3 =TRINITY
other believed in the  3in1,schisma as consequence.

There are actually three different concepts for this ratio we refer to as PI.  This has already been posted in reply # 338.  I am not going to re-argue all of the same points that have already been addressed in this thread already.  Please read the thread before you comment, or don't comment at all.  I think this is fair and not too much to ask.

Gravock

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #564 on: September 01, 2017, 03:18:45 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2125
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #565 on: September 01, 2017, 10:17:08 AM »
       Good Morning,"gravityblock" ! (PT-time)
You are right by your oppinion,that I did not follow your thread
from the beginnings up to the last reply !
Not because this "self-question" and "my and others-self response" shall be unimportant but because there are here on
overunity.com much more day-by-day energy use essential
question and answer trials !
If I did disturb your "lawn" diriged by your own rules I have to please you for " Pardon-moi,s'il vous plait !"?
 T'AO of e=2,7.. of Pi=3,14... of log/lg=... means a living
Universe,sensitive and living.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_I_Won_the_War

Have a good day and then a nice weekend
                                                             OCWL

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2125
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #566 on: September 01, 2017, 10:17:34 AM »
                   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux3u31SAeEM                                 OCWL


Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #567 on: September 01, 2017, 02:31:16 PM »
                   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux3u31SAeEM                                 OCWL

Make Your Life Extraordinary!

Gravock

Offline gravityblock

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
    • Get Dish Now! Free Dish Network System from VMC Satellite
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #568 on: September 01, 2017, 03:20:40 PM »
lancaIV,

Do you know what the most feared equation in the world is?

Gravock


Offline mikefromspace

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #569 on: September 01, 2017, 04:18:20 PM »
First of all E=Mc2 cannot represent a body at rest because there is no rest, ever, for anything, period, because it must be continually fueled by the current of time itself, which can be narrowed down to the most hydraulically superior particle, the electron neutrino .00012x e mass.
From there, it is important to understand evidences that there are actually 2 electron masses required to explain matter. REf; Egor Babaev's 1.5 superconductivity which my model predicted many years in advance (1995/96) and if you prefer proof, see page 27 January Discover magazine 2017.
You are about to understand what I have known for over 20 years; that space is kinetic zero point using 3 poles, matter being the 3rd which gets stuck as the last one out in a game of musical chairs on linear planes of 3 phase disturbances otherwise known as vortexes with appendage geometries all fit inside 7 possible forms using bosons as the space in which En's have to replace in mass to and from stars which consume En-s, as well as the bulk of energetic particles, to create new large particles of higher mass. With that simple concept you easily explain away the need for cold dark matter and a load of other b.s. , as En's would naturally be driven kinetically to replace that mass. The galaxy thins out at the edges from a bulge, does it not? Solar wind does exist? Galaxies must move to exist and stars must have a galaxy to exist? Serioiusly, how long do stars last once they exit a galaxy to any good distance? They don't, unless they're making their own new particles as a middleweight black hole or greater.
So, who wants the formula for unification? Credit mikefromspace on youtube;
It is very elementary; 4/3 pie R to the 3rd , which is the volume of a sphere. Apply this to 4 spheres. 3 line up inside the 4th. Sphere #1 is .00012 more energy than the sum of spheres 2 and or 3, depending on what particles the star(s) create, but for practical purposes you can assume sphere 2, the positive pole, counters most. So, negative , positive, matter, while the remaining volume in sphere 4 is energy, so in a 3 phase environment (required to form gridlock on 2d building block planes) all 3 spheres modulate in and out of energy and mass when situated on the 2d plane(zero point vortex) for matter creation. Otherwise they are unconfined and without matter relative to define their actions lean to being 1 dimensional.
This means the universe is infinite with no big bang. That the thermal constant is merely due to DeBroglie waves made through the least recycled particle (neither in supply nor demand due to it's mass, k meson #2). REDSHIFT is merely a result of DeBroglie waves slowed and sped up due to particle recycling! Just think about it. I've applied this model to every conceivable appication, finding zero fault.  Space is simple. Atoms are constantly exploding and imploding with zero point. Zero point is defined best by Tom Bearden and Nikola Tesla; The secret of zero point is the implosion of pump z waves through a nonlinear medium. Waves set in sync yet out of phase must combine to form a sum of wave peaks after focus. ...So taking this further I figured out that a carrier wave will cause carried waves to become pump z waves and that carrier waves will naturally become pump z waves if the carried wave is transformed before it can continue the other 180d or 120d of it's 360d cycle.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!
« Reply #569 on: September 01, 2017, 04:18:20 PM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: