Would you share some details about the device E2 linked here? Obviously you know the principle and claim to have IP on this machine, otherwise you would not force him to remove the video.
I would never make any claims to the "intellectual" property of Mr. Willis.
I was the person taking the video referenced. I used my camera and intended it to be for private use. Mr. Willis continues to use it publicly without my permission and appears to be using my video as "proof" of something.
I asked Wllis in one of the forums to remove my videos from his youtube channel and stop using them. Willis claimed that I had no right as the video was taken without his permission and then began a personal attack. Just watch how Willis responds to this thread. His response will have NOTHING to do with his technology or the actual events in question.
My video proves nothing. Watch it closely. Watch all of the videos closely. What would you like me to explain, why he has not been kidnapped by aliens?
Go back over the YEARS of Willis' stories, excuses and justifications for his non performance. The same "problems" cycle through regularly in his threads.
Sometimes the problem is storage or frequency: lead batteries, no batteries, gel batteries, lithium batteries, deep cycle batteries. Change. Repeat. In truth, they all "work" equally well.
The supposed "emissions" from the unit? The "emissions" where "discovered" by Willis when a transformer blew across the street from his apartment "workshop". Of course it had to caused by Willis' unit. How else could the explosion be explained?
Has anyone EVER seen ANY evidence of independent scientific evaluation of any aspect of Willis' "invention"? How could Willis make this claim without showing a single piece of paper proving that an emission, any emission, existed?
It is the internet. Anyone can say anything.
I took a similar video of the University demo that Willis claims proved the unit's efficiency. Willis has a copy of that video as well but would never release that because it does NOT prove what he claims it does. He knows the University would take legal action against him if he tried to claim otherwise.
I really wish real evidence existed. I wish it would be worth my while to bother with legal claims against this "inventor".
I was a novice in the OU game when I met Willis and I have learned much since.
The people in this game who claim they can not come out with a technology because "they" were warned by "them" to *insert some bullshit story here* are obvious frauds.
Any technology blocked for national security or other legal reasons comes complete with a bona fide gag order that has serious teeth. The recipients of such orders say nothing, take their payout (which is NOT gazillions of dollars) and get on with their lives working in other areas of science.
The technology for a true energy revolution does exist. It can be demonstrated and the scientific principals behind it can be fully explained without inventing terms or altering the laws of physics. It does not have to be actively suppressed because the money for the inevitable transformation is not available.
When the hydrocarbons are done, "miracles" will become necessary and not one minute before without MONEY.
REAL money. As in hundreds of millions of dollars. And that is just TO START. And guess what? The investors who take that initial risk will not make gazillions of dollars. They will be lucky to break even.
Those who think they can change the world "selling" $5,000 units and posting 86 part installation videos without actually delivering a working unit may take a while to do so.