Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?  (Read 48688 times)

L4ZEP

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2013, 05:02:57 PM »
Where is the magician to state the nature of gravity?

Gwandau

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 363
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2013, 11:33:49 PM »
@derekwillstar and everybody else mesmerized by the big unknown mysteries still vacant for great discoveries,
 
When dealing with something yet beyond our understanding we all do the same error, namely incorporating a bunch of preconceptions upon which we base our theories. These preconceptions are falsely regarded as validated facts, like the "fact" that the speed of light is constant, since our experiments performed repeatedly seem to indicate this. Even the "fact" that light is something that moves from A to B is a preconception based merely upon observations and experiments based upon our preconception that if a light produced at one end and detected on another end, it must be traveling.
 
But light must not neccessarily be something that travels from A to B. Light may just as well be the observed resultant between two field systems,
and the speed of light merely the time differential between the two field systems.
 
This goes for gravity as well.

Gravity does not neccessarily have to be a force in itself, it may just be matter expressing a field differential within an hitherto unknown field system being the resultant of our planet earth. This field may even be an underlying field responsible for matter itself. Or it may be something completely different, like the resultant of a universal field pressure.
 

A lot of things indicate we may have got most things wrong, and this shows when science approaches areas that borders the observable macro and micro cosmos, getting the poor physcisist helplessly entangled in the contradictory web of quantum theory or strange faster than speed of light values when calculating expansion speed between big distances in an expanding universe.
 
I do not mean that the contemporary interpretation of physical reality is not functional knowledge to a certain extent, I mean that it is subjected to so many wrong interpretations that it may be a bad start when trying to deal with gravity, light, magnetism or any of the major so called forces, since mankind still only have guesses when it comes to the major parts of physical source dynamics.
 

As far as I am concerned, there are three major alternatives explaining the source dynamics of gravity:

1.    Our old paleontological idea that gravity is an attractive force since it hurts when the caveman dropped the stone on his foot.
 
2.    The concept of "primordial cosmological pressure", making gravity a resultant of the expanding universe and acting upon matter as an aether pressure.
       In this scenario matter acts as a shield, making big bodies like planets have a big pressure resultant acting upon matter in its vicinity.
       There is today not one single observation that favors the attraction or the pressure concept, it is just that the attraction concept is our primordial visual 
       interpretation of gravity.
 
3.   Gravity as not being a force whatsoever, but merely the expressed differential between the field value of the rock dropped by the caveman and the field
      value of the planet as a whole. This third alternative calls for a completely new outlook on physical reality, were everything in universe is relative in its truests
      sense. We are here talking Relativity on full basis, were every single physical particle is unique and tagged with its own specific field value.
 

What I am trying to say, these discussions about gravity or any other of our still unknown major forces that is surfacing on this forum every once in a while are always getting entangled in our inability to think outside the box, and when I say "outside the box" I mean this concept in its true sense, without any distorting residues of preconceived "facts".
 
It seems to me that most attempts to approach the mystery of gravity always have been based upon the caveman theory, no matter how complex and delicate the resulting theory.

I like this thread, how about leaving the safe caveman ground and ascend a bit?  The elevation is good for the spirit and give us a nice view.
It is all about these above three alternatives, and of course any other suggestions by you guys that qualifies for a standalone place on the list.

Cheers,

Gwandau

derekwillstar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #17 on: April 16, 2013, 11:04:20 AM »
@derekwillstar and everybody else mesmerized by the big unknown mysteries still vacant for great discoveries,
 
When dealing with something yet beyond our understanding we all do the same error, namely incorporating a bunch of preconceptions upon which we base our theories. These preconceptions are falsely regarded as validated facts, like the "fact" that the speed of light is constant, since our experiments performed repeatedly seem to indicate this. Even the "fact" that light is something that moves from A to B is a preconception based merely upon observations and experiments based upon our preconception that if a light produced at one end and detected on another end, it must be traveling.
 
But light must not neccessarily be something that travels from A to B. Light may just as well be the observed resultant between two field systems,
and the speed of light merely the time differential between the two field systems.
 
This goes for gravity as well.

Gravity does not neccessarily have to be a force in itself, it may just be matter expressing a field differential within an hitherto unknown field system being the resultant of our planet earth. This field may even be an underlying field responsible for matter itself. Or it may be something completely different, like the resultant of a universal field pressure.
 

A lot of things indicate we may have got most things wrong, and this shows when science approaches areas that borders the observable macro and micro cosmos, getting the poor physcisist helplessly entangled in the contradictory web of quantum theory or strange faster than speed of light values when calculating expansion speed between big distances in an expanding universe.
 
I do not mean that the contemporary interpretation of physical reality is not functional knowledge to a certain extent, I mean that it is subjected to so many wrong interpretations that it may be a bad start when trying to deal with gravity, light, magnetism or any of the major so called forces, since mankind still only have guesses when it comes to the major parts of physical source dynamics.
 

As far as I am concerned, there are three major alternatives explaining the source dynamics of gravity:

1.    Our old paleontological idea that gravity is an attractive force since it hurts when the caveman dropped the stone on his foot.
 
2.    The concept of "primordial cosmological pressure", making gravity a resultant of the expanding universe and acting upon matter as an aether pressure.
       In this scenario matter acts as a shield, making big bodies like planets have a big pressure resultant acting upon matter in its vicinity.
       There is today not one single observation that favors the attraction or the pressure concept, it is just that the attraction concept is our primordial visual 
       interpretation of gravity.
 
3.   Gravity as not being a force whatsoever, but merely the expressed differential between the field value of the rock dropped by the caveman and the field
      value of the planet as a whole. This third alternative calls for a completely new outlook on physical reality, were everything in universe is relative in its truests
      sense. We are here talking Relativity on full basis, were every single physical particle is unique and tagged with its own specific field value.
 

What I am trying to say, these discussions about gravity or any other of our still unknown major forces that is surfacing on this forum every once in a while are always getting entangled in our inability to think outside the box, and when I say "outside the box" I mean this concept in its true sense, without any distorting residues of preconceived "facts".
 
It seems to me that most attempts to approach the mystery of gravity always have been based upon the caveman theory, no matter how complex and delicate the resulting theory.

I like this thread, how about leaving the safe caveman ground and ascend a bit?  The elevation is good for the spirit and give us a nice view.
It is all about these above three alternatives, and of course any other suggestions by you guys that qualifies for a standalone place on the list.

Cheers,

Gwandau



Thank you very much for this reply!  :D


is the response of a person who thinks up their own minds, and I respect your theories!


if the safe caveman comes out of his cave, find a lot of light to be blinded, and turning to the ones brought out say:
Mad! I first saw it very well, now I've blinded! >:(


Forgetting that the source of this light is the sun, the heat source and life, which is always present, and we take it for granted, the same way of gravity!


I am glad that you like the topic, I proposed this question precisely because it is a key question of the occult mechanism of gravity!
it's like I sent a message in a bottle .... hoping someone would find him  :'(


is since 2009 that I became interested in frontier science, I tried first to understand the message of the main characters of frontier science, which W.Riech, Edward Leedskalnin, Vickor Schauberger and Pier Luigi Ighina ... then I crossed their revelations (even if only on a theoretical level) always with a critical mind ...


And it is for this reason that in the case of gravity (the "simple obvious" gravity), we can not only consider the scientific aspect, but we must also consider the creation that is always involved!



only then can we understand something more


by asking the questions:


Why does it work so? ???


and simultaneously:


Why was it so? :o

may not like this approach, and maybe I'm also presenting the wrong way, but it's the only way I know ...  :)


http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xym38g_credo-per-comprendere-non-comprendo-per-credere_tech



I am Italian and excuse me for my language difficulties (google traslator help me  :-[ )


greetings




Gwandau

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 363
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #18 on: April 16, 2013, 07:09:44 PM »
derekwillstar,
 
your open minded response makes me glad, you know, this forum got a lot of talented and experienced guys in the free energy movement but still most of the guys here seems to cling dearly to either one theory or another for whatever reason makes them comfortable.
 
To be open minded and at the same time critical is one of the greatest mental and spiritual achievements attainable by the human mind, and it does not come for free, since the price often is the death of your own visions in making room for new insights.
 
I myself have a favourite unorthodox theory of gravity, being the "Unity theory" by David Barclay, but I don't want to spoil the lucidity of being in the midst of the Mystery of Here and Now by investing all my conscious mandate into a mere blueprint of reality that additionally always will be subject to revision.
 
So I study David Barclays' outlook on reality with an open mind, and since his theory explain some hitherto unsolved paradoxes, I find it quite interesting. As a matter of fact, I produced an attempt to make his theories more easily available through my paper "An unpresedented approach to the physics behind the extraterrestrial drive" where I explain Davids view on gravity through the technique used by our alien visitors, who obviously have mastered the phenomenon of gravity as well as the method of instant propagation in space. So instead of describing the phenomenon of gravity seen through the complex Unity concept in this post, I think it would be far better to introduce you to Unity through my paper posted in the Gravity Control forum.
 
http://www.gravitycontrol.org/forum/index.php?topic=328.0
 
Would be nice to hear your opinion of this theory.

But then again, all theories, no matter how seemingly validated, will always be subject to revision through time, since any system of paradigm depicted is noting but a dead blueprint of something immensely vast, infinitly dynamic and eternally ungraspable.

But it would still be nice to master gravity, wouldn't it?

Regards,

Gwandau

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2013, 10:21:13 AM »
snip..
But then again, all theories, no matter how seemingly validated, will always be subject to revision through time, since any system of paradigm depicted is noting but a dead blueprint of something immensely vast, infinitly dynamic and eternally ungraspable.
snip..

Very elegantly said.   KneeDeep!

Yes, it would be nice to master gravity, my arthritis would be more bearable!. In the meantime, time in a pool, is the best thing for this land-lubbering toad.

Cheers

derekwillstar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2013, 12:08:24 PM »
Very elegantly said.   KneeDeep!

Yes, it would be nice to master gravity, my arthritis would be more bearable!. In the meantime, time in a pool, is the best thing for this land-lubbering toad.

Cheers



I am sorry for your arthritis! (did you try therapy with an orgone accumulator of W. Reich??)


it is my belief that we are not able to find, because we do not know what to look for ...
(we are attracted to the center of the earth, or we are pushed??  :P  )


conventional science has underestimated the magnetism, it can not be doing something wrong, basically could not do anything else ...
(but science has been enchanted with a theory of gravity than 350 years old and refuses to see anything else!)


The magnetism on earth behaves in the way we know it, just because it is influenced by gravity ...
The permanent magnets exist in a self-sustaining equilibrium just because we live in a reflection of energy.


But at this point it would be able to make a free magnetism to become "mono-magnetism" and unleash an unknown power?


I'm always very cautious when it comes to UFOs and extraterrestrials (I've never seen one but it does not mean they do not exist), but it seems that thousands of years ago, most of us knew someone in the "Matter"


http://www.fortunadrago.it/?p=2398 (translator on top right)


and consequently also of "Gravity"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDh_QEYoFTE


Considered in addition to Edward Leedskalnin (by Coral Castle) officially made ​​the job cuts stones, went to work in the cave at night, and the day the workers were the work already done, the stone blocks cut and moved, at the end they just had to pay.


At the end ... If you know what to look for, then we will also find it!

greetings

derekwillstar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2013, 12:01:06 PM »
derekwillstar,
 
your open minded response makes me glad, you know, this forum got a lot of talented and experienced guys in the free energy movement but still most of the guys here seems to cling dearly to either one theory or another for whatever reason makes them comfortable.
 
To be open minded and at the same time critical is one of the greatest mental and spiritual achievements attainable by the human mind, and it does not come for free, since the price often is the death of your own visions in making room for new insights.
 
I myself have a favourite unorthodox theory of gravity, being the "Unity theory" by David Barclay, but I don't want to spoil the lucidity of being in the midst of the Mystery of Here and Now by investing all my conscious mandate into a mere blueprint of reality that additionally always will be subject to revision.
 
So I study David Barclays' outlook on reality with an open mind, and since his theory explain some hitherto unsolved paradoxes, I find it quite interesting. As a matter of fact, I produced an attempt to make his theories more easily available through my paper "An unpresedented approach to the physics behind the extraterrestrial drive" where I explain Davids view on gravity through the technique used by our alien visitors, who obviously have mastered the phenomenon of gravity as well as the method of instant propagation in space. So instead of describing the phenomenon of gravity seen through the complex Unity concept in this post, I think it would be far better to introduce you to Unity through my paper posted in the Gravity Control forum.
 
http://www.gravitycontrol.org/forum/index.php?topic=328.0
 
Would be nice to hear your opinion of this theory.

But then again, all theories, no matter how seemingly validated, will always be subject to revision through time, since any system of paradigm depicted is noting but a dead blueprint of something immensely vast, infinitly dynamic and eternally ungraspable.

But it would still be nice to master gravity, wouldn't it?

Regards,

Gwandau



Thank you so much ...
I had a look to the theory that you proposed, and it is always the magnetism in the game!


But magnetism is much more than what we know ... (as it is gravity that makes it so, and we ferromagnetic substances, paramagnetic and diamagnetic)


Lately, thanks to the research of David La Point, I theorized that the universe in which we live, it is electric, it holographic, but rather is magnetic.


http://www.fortunadrago.it/?p=2744 (Traslation on top right)
Alternate Address : http://fortunadrago.xoom.it/main?p=2744 (Traslation on top right)

So we live in a Magnetic Universe!
magnetism is capable of bending the light


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bVxF1jX7zk


(put the video SETTING on 240p and watch carefully the pole of the magnet. what i see is a flow that looks like heat coming from the pole of the N-52 neo magnet i am holding. what i mean by "heat" is the visible distortion that a heat source would produce. at 1:15)


This is because even the light has a magnetic nature


and in the solar system, we have the biggest magnet that you might have, our sun ...
This may also mean that everything we see is nothing but a giant, wonderful deception


http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/orrery_2006.swf


as you can see in this simulation, by selecting the system Tychonian we see the view from planet earth, stationary and everything else goes, because as a huge carousel, only energy from the sun is moving and carries with it the light we see...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0ZoaxLfH00


Just an Illusion...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zECnqYugEyY



P.S.
If we are attracted to the center of the earth, or we are pushed, however, we need a foothold.
Where is the point of support of Gravity?
« Last Edit: April 18, 2013, 03:54:00 PM by derekwillstar »

hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #22 on: April 19, 2013, 09:35:11 AM »
snip...
But magnetism is much more than what we know ... (as it is gravity that makes it so, and we ferromagnetic substances, paramagnetic and diamagnetic)
Lately, thanks to the research of David La Point, I theorized that the universe in which we live, it is electric, it holographic, but rather is magnetic.
snip....

If magnetism and electricity are two sides of the same coin, then gravity is probably the rim of the coin.

This site may interest you.       http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/

Cheers

derekwillstar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2013, 08:16:34 PM »
If magnetism and electricity are two sides of the same coin, then gravity is probably the rim of the coin.

This site may interest you.       http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/

Cheers


It is a fact that where there is no electricity and magnetism, and vice versa :


http://www.fortunadrago.it/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/ehrenhaft3.jpg


but as I said earlier, we must reflect on what is creating and what is the sustenance of life


(a simple coin is man-made)



To the creation serves light, heat, energy, gravity and the ability to instantly create any type of matter the need ...


everything must be able to verify at great distances, electricity as we know it, does not need the creation!


For example, if we see the plant world, its function is to grow, multiply, changing continuously the dead leaves with the live ones ...


P.S.
Where is the heart of a plant?

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #24 on: April 21, 2013, 10:01:16 PM »


Thank you so much ...
I had a look to the theory that you proposed, and it is always the magnetism in the game!


But magnetism is much more than what we know ... (as it is gravity that makes it so, and we ferromagnetic substances, paramagnetic and diamagnetic)


Lately, thanks to the research of David La Point, I theorized that the universe in which we live, it is electric, it holographic, but rather is magnetic.


http://www.fortunadrago.it/?p=2744 (Traslation on top right)
Alternate Address : http://fortunadrago.xoom.it/main?p=2744 (Traslation on top right)

So we live in a Magnetic Universe!
magnetism is capable of bending the light


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bVxF1jX7zk


(put the video SETTING on 240p and watch carefully the pole of the magnet. what i see is a flow that looks like heat coming from the pole of the N-52 neo magnet i am holding. what i mean by "heat" is the visible distortion that a heat source would produce. at 1:15)


This is because even the light has a magnetic nature


and in the solar system, we have the biggest magnet that you might have, our sun ...
This may also mean that everything we see is nothing but a giant, wonderful deception


http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/orrery_2006.swf


as you can see in this simulation, by selecting the system Tychonian we see the view from planet earth, stationary and everything else goes, because as a huge carousel, only energy from the sun is moving and carries with it the light we see...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0ZoaxLfH00


Just an Illusion...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zECnqYugEyY



P.S.
If we are attracted to the center of the earth, or we are pushed, however, we need a foothold.
Where is the point of support of Gravity?


 Well magnetism is the result of the electric field. In nature this is how everything works. The origin is the potential values of bodies in space. This is because we live in a huge field called our solar system. Yes the end point is the sun and reflects back all the potential of our solar system.


 Gravity on the other hand is a central point to that potential field. In our case the sun at solar system scale but much closer is our planet. Because space is displaced it creates a vacuum of the space medium, this medium likes to stay balanced and uniform but matter displaces this space and a potential is formed inside of that matter. In the true center of matter is the vacuum and not in space. Space is only the field that our matter floats in and displaces. Like our planet all objects displace space and all objects then are effected by each other when brought into near field.
 This vacuum creates or makes the space field want to flow towards it and will do so in between matter. What is attracted in that flow is a very even flow of charges that get dragged along with the flow of space towards the center spot.


 As for the video I saw nothing out of the ordinary in it. here was just as much pixelation around your skin of your hand as I saw around the contrasting colors you put together. This is due to compression errors in the video processing of YouTube.


 It doesn't seem to be anything to note in the video, in my opinion.


 so to be clear gravity isn't because of anything but the electric field of our solar system and it's reaction to being displaced by matter.

derekwillstar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #25 on: April 22, 2013, 11:00:07 AM »

 Well magnetism is the result of the electric field. In nature this is how everything works. The origin is the potential values of bodies in space. This is because we live in a huge field called our solar system. Yes the end point is the sun and reflects back all the potential of our solar system.


 Gravity on the other hand is a central point to that potential field. In our case the sun at solar system scale but much closer is our planet. Because space is displaced it creates a vacuum of the space medium, this medium likes to stay balanced and uniform but matter displaces this space and a potential is formed inside of that matter. In the true center of matter is the vacuum and not in space. Space is only the field that our matter floats in and displaces. Like our planet all objects displace space and all objects then are effected by each other when brought into near field.
 This vacuum creates or makes the space field want to flow towards it and will do so in between matter. What is attracted in that flow is a very even flow of charges that get dragged along with the flow of space towards the center spot.


 As for the video I saw nothing out of the ordinary in it. here was just as much pixelation around your skin of your hand as I saw around the contrasting colors you put together. This is due to compression errors in the video processing of YouTube.


 It doesn't seem to be anything to note in the video, in my opinion.


 so to be clear gravity isn't because of anything but the electric field of our solar system and it's reaction to being displaced by matter.



The video is not mine, but David Lambright


http://www.youtube.com/user/potatoheadist?feature=watch


worth more later time (240p) the distortion occurs at the end of the magnet, and this is not a youtube effect.
Otherwise you can see this :


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRgcC_mK97k


From the description of the video :


Quote
i am using a 1 1/2" aluminum tube filled with iron oxide [charged like a PMH] the rock is sedimentary with lots of shells in it. this video is more like what i see. the distortion of image under the stone i like a liquid. when i move the stone around in the field, i sometimes see eddys [whirlpools]from the corners. this is exciting. this energy is like a mirage. and a mirage is a reflective surface. add a circular eddy and you get a lens. it has been hard enough to get the image of this field, getting images of the eddys i am sure will prove to be difficult, but i will get images of this phenomena. to anyone not familiar with my devices, i made a PMH ,[Leedskalnin], using iron oxide inside the aluminum tube.i energized with a 9.6 volt DC battery six months previous and removed the coil.

is dramatically important to understand that magnetism can distort the light, and what we see!


since spoken of electricity, public writings of Edward Leedskalnin electricity:


Quote
Before my research work I knew nothing about electricity. The only thing I knew was that nobody knows what electricity is. So I thought I am going to find out why they do not know. I thought that if electricity could be made and managed for over a hundred years, then the makers do not know what it is, there is something wrong about it. I found out that the researchers were misled by wrong instruction books, and by one-sided instruments. Voltmeters and ampere meters are one-sided. They only show what is called by instruction books, positive electricity, but never show negative electricity. Now you can see that one-half of the electricity escaped their notice. If the researchers had used the same kind of equipment I use to demonstrate what magnetic current is, they would have found out a long time ago what electricity is. The positive electricity is composed of streams of north pole individual magnets, and negative electricity is composed of streams of south pole individual magnets. They are running one stream of magnets against the other stream in whirling right hand twist, and with high speed.
   

    Protons and electrons—Are you sure they are not the north and south pole individual magnets. If we have anything we have to show that we have it. Show the base where it came from, and show how the thing functions.  We can find concentrated north and south pole individual magnets in the earth, in a metal. With the metal we can demonstrate that the free north and south pole individual magnets are circulating in the earth. In the North Hemisphere the south pole individual magnets are going up, and the north pole individual magnets are coming down. Those free circulating north and south individual magnets are the building material for the magnet metal we find in the earth. This should show that the north and south pole individual magnets are the real atom builders, and not the protons and electrons.(...continue)


to deepen, please refer to the original document :


http://www.leedskalnin.com/Leedskalnins-Writings-ADVERTISEMENT.html




derekwillstar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #26 on: April 29, 2013, 10:43:22 AM »

greetings
I had problems with the site fortunadrago.it, was off from 23/04 to 25/04 but now it seems to work well ...  :o


in summary ...


Edward Leedskalnin makes some observations on electricity, tools (all) measure only the positive direction of electricity, he realizes that "In the North Hemisphere the south pole individual magnets are going up, and the north pole individual magnets are coming down" and he's not discussing the normal earth's magnetic field, but Gravity and (in my opinion) is confirming that that is the Law of Rhythm Pier Luigi Ighina:


http://www.fortunadrago.it/?page_id=279 (translation on top right)


"In the north Hemisfere" place where there is Coral Castle (Homestead - Florida - USA)
"South pole individual magnets are going up," this is the flow of monopolies as "individual magnets" negative, cold, yin, blue, polarity of the south, coming from the center of the earth and the sun ascends. (left handed)


"And the north pole individual magnets are coming down," this is the flow of monopolies positive, warm, yang, yellow, polarity of the north, which comes from the sun, through any kind of matter existing in creation, giving to it (in its fall toward the center of the Earth) the acceleration of gravity. (right handed)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O6V6EiG2F8

This flow reaching the center of the earth on all sides, collide and reversed by changing polarity (north to south), the direction of rotation (from right-handed to left pattern), color (from yellow to blue), from hot to cold and not more downward, but upward to the sun.
the two flows mono-magnetic against whirling  give origin to a powerful balance between them, whose only result is precisely the acceleration of gravity!
A difficult balance to break, it takes a lot of energy to break it, as in the case of the machine of the monopolies :


http://www.fortunadrago.it/?page_id=377 (translation on top right)



This machine whirling through the coils (which could only withstand 12V) but powered by 132V (only from batteries)!
Break the normal balance between the flow of monopolies, capturing them and making them available.
It is a generator whatever, but it is able to unbalance the vital energy of those who are in the immediate vicinity!
(such as skin rashes, stomach cramps, sudden anger)

Roi

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #27 on: April 29, 2013, 08:53:22 PM »
 [font=]The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?[/font]
[font=]I guess that the best main question is: How Gravity works?[/font]
Maybe some answers can be found here:
 www.quantumgravity.us
This guy is against the physics mainstream!
Publicly, he admitted the existence of possibility to get free energy!

derekwillstar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #28 on: April 30, 2013, 10:26:52 AM »
[font=]The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?[/font]
[font=]I guess that the best main question is: How Gravity works?[/font]
Maybe some answers can be found here:
 www.quantumgravity.us
This guy is against the physics mainstream!
Publicly, he admitted the existence of possibility to get free energy!



Gravity is something tangible, existing!
it is linked to the matter and the survival of creation itself.


we can not deal with the problem only from the scientific side, there is need to expand the discourse precisely because the gravity imposes it!

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: The main question is: Why Gravity takes effect on Matter?
« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2013, 05:01:27 PM »


The video is not mine, but David Lambright


http://www.youtube.com/user/potatoheadist?feature=watch


worth more later time (240p) the distortion occurs at the end of the magnet, and this is not a youtube effect.
Otherwise you can see this :


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRgcC_mK97k


From the description of the video :


is dramatically important to understand that magnetism can distort the light, and what we see!


since spoken of electricity, public writings of Edward Leedskalnin electricity:



to deepen, please refer to the original document :


http://www.leedskalnin.com/Leedskalnins-Writings-ADVERTISEMENT.html


 I in fact know who was the originator of the video. But as you can see from any video with a bright pattern like the yellow mat he used under the device that it causes pixilation errors in the video due to the digital transform process. It is a sort of matrixing even that happen to edges of dark with bright patterned backgrounds. matrixing is a product of those patterns when converting one resolution to the next. In fact most video cards have a driver based algorythem that deals with this problem on a hardware level. Antialiasing is this algorythem.


 It is a well know effect and There is a fix for it but only in the video hardware. Since YouTube is come of age it still has not dealt with this issue and most video cameras do not deal with it as well. If this would happen with an analogue video camera I would be inclined to look into it but it doesn't. matrixing is a digital effect and not an analogue one.


 As for gravity what does this have to do with it? A magnetic field has nothing to do with gravity. It is the effect of the electric field on space and matter. First you need the potential field and then expose matter to the field and then you get a current, which we call magnetic current. Without the electric field there is no current and hence no magnetic field.


 If you want to understand gravity one needs to understand the electric field and how it interacts with matter to create a pull towards the center of the mass. If you look at the periodic table you will see that all matter has a standing potential or commonly called electro negativity. lets look at copper for instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper

 If we understand that masses the size of our planet actually have a distance associated with it and an additive potential as well. The surface of the planet would have a value associated with it and is concentrated inside of the planet into the core. Since there is heavy iron at the core this electric potential becomes active and changes a portion of the electrical potential of the whole of the planet into a magnetic, heat, and gravity components.

 None of this would be possible without the electric field and the potential of the matter in that electric field. Each body in space is additive to the whole scale of the body in space. This is not limited to solid bodies, it also includes the solar system and galaxy as well. This is how gravity works plain and simple.