Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

# New Book

### Statistics

• Total Members: 81628
• Latest: iura7

• Total Posts: 480832
• Total Topics: 14182
• Online Today: 44
• Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
• Users: 6
• Guests: 227
• Total: 233

### Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 969616 times)

#### hanon

• Hero Member
• Posts: 610
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4185 on: January 25, 2017, 12:27:04 PM »

Figuera device: two electromagnets oppossing forces near balance (in unison) moving along the induced coil length.

This post describes how two electromagnets forces are balanced and how the plane of magnetic lines collision is moved depending on the ratio of max/min currents used and the length ratio of inducer/induced coils. In order to achieve a change in the electromagnet force two factor are needed: current change (I) and air path change (x). If air path (R+x for one inducer or R+1+x for the other inducer) is constant then no movement is achieved because the force is then independent of the air path between the poles of the electromagnets and then no relation exists between the forces and the spatial dimension. Note that the electromagnet force equation just takes into consideration the air path between its poles because the air path is the high reluctance step compared to the low reluctance step along the magnetic steel. In fact both electromagnets forces search for balance and find the spatial point "x" where both forces are equal and then move the collision plane to that point "x" as response of the diference of current intensities applied in each electromagnet. The movement along the induced coil is just the response to search for equal forces: F_1 = F_2

At lines movement reversals the near balance forces are then completely balanced in order to provoke the movement reversal ( F1 = F2 ). Being R the length ratio of inducer/induced  ( R = Length_inducer / Length_induced ) , the equation which relates the currents in the electromagnets with the movement along the induced coil length is:

I_1 / (R+x) = I_2 / (R+1-x)

Which at max/min limits (x=0 or x = 1, the geometrical limits of the induced coil) we get:

I_max / I_min  <=  ( R + 1 ) / R

Under the ideal conditions assumed to get this result if the current ratio is higher than that limit, (R+1)/R, then the magnetic lines are moved outside of the induced coil extremes and then induction is stopped. Therefore, as a guideline, the current max/min ratio must be always below that value to guarantee that magnetic lines are always inside the induced coil limits.

If the lengths in inducer and induced are the same (Length ratio, R = 1) then the limit value for current ratio is (R+1)/R = = (1+1)/1 = 2 . If we take as reference the 1908 patent drawing dimensions where inducers are longer than induced coils and aprox. R = 2, then the limit value is (R+1)/R = (2+1)/2= 3/2 = 1.5
« Last Edit: January 25, 2017, 04:05:04 PM by hanon »

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4185 on: January 25, 2017, 12:27:04 PM »

#### hanon

• Hero Member
• Posts: 610
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4186 on: February 15, 2017, 10:38:22 AM »
Analyzing the impendance in the whole system with the Ohm´s Law we have that the condition for maximum and minimum current is found when the battery is connected directly to one row of electromagnets and the other path for current has to transverse the regulator and the other row of electromagnets.

Z_regulator : impedance in the regulator ( whether resistance or inductive reactance )

Z_electromagnets: impedance in each row of electromagnets

Maximum current: I_max = Voltage / Z_electromagnet

Minimum current: I_min = Voltage / ( Z_regulator + Z_electromagnets)

Then the achievable ratio of currents is:

I_max / I_min = ( Z_regulator + Z_electromagnets ) / Z_electromagnets

If Z_reg = Z_elec then I_max/I_min = 2

If Z_reg = 2·Z_elec then I_max/I_min = 3

If Z_reg = 4·Z_elec then I_max/I_min = 5

If Z_elec approach to zero then I_max/I_min goes to a very high value. Not good. (Besides when Z_elec tend toward zero then you have very few turns and your electromagnets is very weak)

The impedances in each part should keep a balance. You should match those impedances to the needed value of current ratio that you need according to your geometry (coils length ratio), etc... You may find an spreadsheet attached which is useful to estimates those values.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2017, 01:22:54 PM by hanon »

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4186 on: February 15, 2017, 10:38:22 AM »

#### Doug1

• Hero Member
• Posts: 768
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4187 on: February 17, 2017, 01:04:26 AM »

#### hanon

• Hero Member
• Posts: 610
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4188 on: February 17, 2017, 06:00:39 PM »
Calculating the inductance of a toroid with the typical sizes that we have seen in the pictures the resulting inductance should be between 0.020 H and 0.040 H (assuming 35 turns in the toroid and relative permeability of 4000). Link to calculator: https://www.easycalculation.com/engineering/electrical/toroid-inductance-calculator.php

Being optimistism we can take 0.040 H and an average current to feed the electromagnets around 6 amperes (too optimistic):

E = 1/2·L·I^2 = ....= 0.72 joules

Taking into account that this process is repeated at 50 Hz (50 times each second) then the final energy is 0.72 * 50 = 36 watts !!

Conclusion: the toroid can be great to reduce the heat losses in the resistors, but it can not store big amounts of energy.

Doug: how many turns have your part G or you would like to build? And how many turns and impedance had your coils?. The only way to increse energy stored is with much more turns ( L ~ N^2 ). If you dont have those parts, at least which would be your choice?

Anyhow I do not buy the idea of the energy recycling in the toroid. If the energy were sent back to the toroid then the current would reverse and the system will suffer a polarity reversal, which is a capital sin in this device. Besides, the patents never mention any energy recycling mechanism.

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4188 on: February 17, 2017, 06:00:39 PM »

#### Doug1

• Hero Member
• Posts: 768
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4189 on: February 17, 2017, 07:07:20 PM »
Anyhow I do not buy the idea of the energy recycling in the toroid. If the energy were sent back to the toroid then the current would reverse and the system will suffer a polarity reversal, which is a capital sin in this device. Besides, the patents never mention any energy recycling mechanism.

You dont have to buy it. Regardless of how many ways it's been worded you cant destroy energy.

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4189 on: February 17, 2017, 07:07:20 PM »

#### hanon

• Hero Member
• Posts: 610
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4190 on: February 17, 2017, 07:36:08 PM »
I meant in the sense MM explain, recycling kilowatts of energy with those thick wires. If you just mean to recycle those 36 watts in that case I could see it as probable.

I see you dont say a word about bulding details. Maybe I am wrong but I am doubting of all , after watching the recomendations that your prophet is saying in EF

#### Doug1

• Hero Member
• Posts: 768
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4191 on: February 17, 2017, 07:36:29 PM »
Go to the link and look at 249 and 250. Then read the entire thing and consider there might be conditions that are not going to make everything universal that will only apply to certain set of conditions.

Follow the directions in the patent with the understanding not all conditions are created equal so not all conditional equations are for use as a universal equations but for a specific set of conditions. As you have yet been able separate part from part or where a particular condition might exist in one part but not in another part by design to perform a function your gonna be lost.

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4191 on: February 17, 2017, 07:36:29 PM »

#### antijon

• Full Member
• Posts: 136
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4192 on: February 18, 2017, 03:45:25 PM »
If you guys are talking about using an electromagnet for your resistance, I'm afraid the only thing you'll be recycling is your time. Figuera's resistance was non inductive. Excess inductive reactance will turn this into a giant transformer, not a generator.

#### Doug1

• Hero Member
• Posts: 768
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4193 on: February 19, 2017, 05:06:10 PM »
Antjon

I can control anything I want with magnetic fields while maintaining separation from the output. That does not assume you will take the time to learn how it was done before the solid state rectifier was invented. The less you know the less you know what you gave up for a better way that was mostly better from the perspective of the beneficiary of that better way. More for them and less for you, less is more. They spend less and make more from you =the better way. It never defines who it was better for.

#### antijon

• Full Member
• Posts: 136
##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4194 on: February 20, 2017, 08:27:10 PM »
Doug, if you are referring to Tesla's rectifier, or a type of saturable reactor, then I already know what it is. The idea behind that is so far-fetched I don't even know where to start.

Figuera used a resistance for a reason. If anyone here has ever ran a transformer in series with a capacitor, they would know what happens. The inductive reactance is altered, and a transformer stops being a transformer. Now I'm not saying it becomes a generator, or produces OU, but turns ratios and other transformer rules start to change. The problem with using a capacitor to reduce inductive reactance is that it's frequency dependent. But a resistance will do the same thing at any frequency, which is why Tesla used a resistance to start some of his motors.

What I'm saying is, a normal generator uses D.C. Exciting current. The exciter winding has ZERO inductive reactance. So if I replaced the D.C. With AC, what would I expect? A giant inefficient transformer with an incredibly high reactance.

Reducing the reactance is a good place to start. Adding reactance, or using an AC source will give you a transformer.

#### Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

##### Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4194 on: February 20, 2017, 08:27:10 PM »