Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 2335045 times)

AVENGERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1950 on: December 21, 2014, 09:30:25 PM »
hanon
I'll start with ( six@4k & 0ne@2k ) that should get me in the ballpark & get the pc board working. I used my best guess from page#194, 3-26 of pjk e book.
Thank You, AVENGERS

marathonman
I would be glad to use more volts and purchase the vitreous edge, I need a sketch to go by, could you provide one , please.
I would just wind up smoking more components.
Thank You, AVENGERS

AVENGERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1951 on: December 21, 2014, 10:55:24 PM »
Doug1
Thank You for the compass direction. I have labeled the coils and the cores, when applying small volts to the PLUS and the poles do reverse when applying volts to the NEGATIVE of the coils.
I rewound the Y core with one wrap of #6 stranded (awg) 600 volt wire, just incase something large comes out.
AVENGERS

hanon
I have cut that small (secondary )wire that is attached to the transformer, thinking I can leave it and not bother removing it from the core, still makes a nice strong electromagnet. Separating the I from the mounting plate is tricky, I found the safe way to keep the individual plates from coming apart is to grind each weld down far enough, Tape the core together for insurance, and chisel the plate away from the I core a little at a time. The I core on the left in the pic, did come apart as I wasn't using tape yet. I taped it up and flattened it out the best I could and smoothed it out on an inverted belt sander.
The pc board will be easy to change values of components. no need to de-soldier.
Thank You all for your help

AVENGERS

AVENGERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1952 on: December 22, 2014, 05:21:13 AM »
hanon
I think I have it now? 6 each 4ohm, 10watt resistors and 1 each 2ohm 10watt resistor.
Thank You, AVENGERS

Doug1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1953 on: December 22, 2014, 12:19:18 PM »
Hanon
  I finally looked over the bucking coil pdf.Glad it was the same info as the youtube automotron voice.Reading it works better for me any way. I dont agree with it entirely but I see it is the inverse method where the leverage is being used in the output coil and the input coil.
  I would think the figurea method having the ability to tune the two inducers with a balance input is a improvement since in the real world stuff happens. When the writer of the paper speaks of keeping the two primary fields separate is where I have a problem.If they are NN or ss they keep themselves separate. He also speaks of the fields growing and collapsing at the same time. I take that to mean he is placing them both in the power on position at the same time when he gets zero results. Im reasonably certain that was his mistake, I do not recall ever reading that both inducer coils were powered on equally in time. Just from the physical construction taken from the drawings it would be clearly offset N and S inducers being powered 180 degrees apart from each other.In themselves each inducer is a complete individual field. The induced coil or pick coil is stationary so the field is what has to move and since they are same poles facing each other the only way for the induced to see relative change in motion is for one of them to collapse enough for the other to expand over the induced coil and then for it to switch back and forth. That way the induced coil sees a relative change in the direction of movement even though the pole faces are the of the same sign. Another advantage in the pole orientation is that as one is falling off the force against it from the opposing magnet will add to the force of the other in its collapse by a small amount. Going back the paper and ref the floyd sweet gen I would have to guess it was not very good without a load. It was not meant to sit idle which may not be important to anyone at first but in practice things change in a hurry.

Doug1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1954 on: December 23, 2014, 09:05:32 PM »
Ever read the long diatribe on increasing the human condition by Tesla ,Leedskinin wrote one as well.
Convert it to math and apply that.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1955 on: December 24, 2014, 07:43:08 AM »
AVENGERS:

Here is a quick sketch i made for you.

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1956 on: December 24, 2014, 10:43:22 AM »
Hi all,

I want to wish you a Merry Christmas and a new year, hopefully, full of energy.

Best regards

gregg2597

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1957 on: December 24, 2014, 06:20:08 PM »
Hi Everyone
I have been reading the Fiquera papers and thought that I would try this circuit.
Ill keep you posted!
Gregg

Sequential LED flasher



Parts List:
    U1 = LM555 timer/oscillator
    U2 = 74LS190
    U3 = 74LS42
    U4 = 74LS76
    P1 = 10K, potentiometer
    R1 = 10K
R2-R11 = 220 ohm
    C1 = 100nF, ceramic
10 LED's, ultra-bright
Notes:
U1, the 555 timer/oscillator clocks a 74LS190 up/down counter (U2). The 74LS190 drives a BCD decoder driver 74LS42 (U3). The 74LS76 has as task to reverse the count on 0 to 9 to 0 and so on. P1 sets the up/down counter speed. R2 to R11 are all 220 ohm carbon-type resistors.
You may have noticed in the diagram it does not specify the 'LS' (Low Schottky) IC types but done for simplicity reasons. If your circuit is powered from a battery you definately should use the LS versions as the current draw is significantly less and so your battery pack will last longer. Same for the 555; use the cmos version to cut down on power.





AVENGERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1958 on: December 25, 2014, 01:44:36 AM »
marathonman
 Thank You, AVENGERS

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1959 on: December 26, 2014, 08:49:51 PM »
These f-in banner adds are flat out annoying and i hope someone chokes on them..... anyways i just found the most ridiculously cheap PCB manufacture if any one is interested. it's so cheap i ordered all my big board designs...Here is the Link....enjoy!
http://www.pcbway.com/

Doug1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1960 on: December 27, 2014, 03:37:17 PM »
 I wish all success using IC's but I personally dont see how it would function the same way as analog systems would. The manipulation required to create the magnetic field of equal strength from two different value inputs into the inducer coil is not explained nor obvious using ic's. The incremental increase and decline is there but it is a singular coil input. Imo it will not be able to run without the source to operate the ic's because the portion of the output to be used over again will be lower or lesser then the source regardless of how it is converted. An increase in voltage potential will come the expense of amperage and visa versa.
  Im not saying anything is impossible, just that I don't see it using ic's.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1961 on: December 31, 2014, 07:53:17 AM »
JUST REMEMBER THE OUTPUT COILS CAN BE SERIES AND OR PARALLEL TO ATTAIN YOUR DESIRED VOLTAGE  (ISN'T THAT WHAT fIGUERAS SAID)
the first pic is food for thought from above.
the second pic is my two channel board  (very rugged little sucker)

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1962 on: January 01, 2015, 05:05:52 PM »
A very enlightening video:

Bucking coils:

http://youtu.be/Z-V1z2TdQJA

Happy new year!!

~Maverick.~

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1963 on: January 03, 2015, 08:30:15 PM »
A very enlightening video:

Bucking coils:

http://youtu.be/Z-V1z2TdQJA

Happy new year!!

The hard part with excepting this setup is that people have been chasing FE for decades. Some of these people are extremely talented and educated in the art of electronics. What would be the odds that over the last 30+ years the hundred of thousands of people who experiment haven't tried this winding setup?

Are we really looking to maximize output of a coil? Wouldn't a coil itself be limited if it were the source of additional energy? If we say that coils only serve the purpose to extract energy then something else must harness the energy. I dont know the answer, but what I do know is that history has shown that people have tinkered with different coil combinations for the last 30+ years. All the results are basically the same......... nothing.

My avenue of approach is a bit different then others, I am suspecting that vibrations in the actual iron core play a large role. As a general example we know that if we add iron to an air core coil we magnify/strengthen the magnetic field. So what if the iron was conditioned more. If the magnetic field originates from the iron what if there was a way to precondition and/or explode the magnetic field outward and inward.

Like everyone else I'm still on "square one". I have taken the advice of people here and built a very flexible setup for experimenting. Having said all that ...... keep up the good work, I'm sure we will succeed. 


marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1964 on: January 07, 2015, 05:12:56 PM »
Hello everyone,

I like the set up of "Bucking Coils" and the intensity is raised and lowered by the resistor Transistor combination but my only problem i have is how to reverse the polarity of the coils. just raising and lowering the current will not give me AC in my output coils, the north stays north and the south stays south. if i can come up with a circuit that reverses the polarity i or we rather will have it made.
can someone please help!