Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 498659
  • *Total Topics: 14684
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 85
  • *Total: 88

Facebook

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 1302911 times)

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4230 on: April 17, 2018, 10:20:05 PM »
This post is dedicated to the brain dead people that still think part G is resistors.

And i quote from Wikipedia on Inductance;

"Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current."
That means larger inductor = less currant flow, smaller inductor = more currant flow and as the brush is constantly rotating so is the size of the inductor on either side of the brush.

Now do you understand Rswami.

now i think that is all i have to say about that. if you still don't get it i guess i am through with you to.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4231 on: April 23, 2018, 10:05:44 AM »
So basically what part G does as the brush rotates is change the ratio of magnetic field to the amount of currant. as the brush rotates the amount of winding's change magnetically linking to the circuit increasing the magnetic field. since self inductance is the reverse EMF that opposes currant flow in the first place the more winding's we add the more opposition to the original currant flow we will have. the opposite is also true, the less winding's we have in the inductor the less the magnetic field the less opposition to currant flow. with a currant rise in the increasing side of part G's magnetic field it is gaining in intensity but the overall space occupied storing the increased potential is small with little reverse EMF.

the iron in the core will enhance the reverse EMF aiding the self inductance of the inductor. if it was an air core the currant reduction would not take place so the addition of the core thus amplifies self inductance to the point of  linear currant reduction. since the real currant flow is from negative to positive the currant flowing into part G from both set N and set S will cause an North><North opposing magnetic fields at the brush and it is these fields that keep the two side of the inductor separate at all times. so what we end up having is one huge inductor separated by magnetic fields divided into two at the brush each acting separate but in complete unison.

we have as the brush rotates  two inductors either increasing or decreasing in length,  increasing or decreasing the reverse EMF to the original currant flow that causes a complete orderly rise or fall of currant in a linear fashion. then to top that off as the currant is reduced the reduction in the field will release that reduce part into the system aided by the reducing primary's potential plus the secondary loop back causing an amplification of potential to the rising primary.

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4232 on: April 23, 2018, 11:03:09 AM »
Every single thing i have said has been verified on the bench. the person that put it in my mind was Doug in the first place in which i do thank you for the wonderful information.

the opposing magnet test can be performed by yourself at your own home that mimics the Figuera device. the self inductance to curtail currant can be performed at your own house. every single thing that has been presented so far can be verified BY YOU AT YOUR OWN HOME.

This device was real and IS REAL thus can be built by ANYONE.

This is a quote from Aubrey Scoons that replicated Royal Rife's work;

"DON’T BE FOOLED!
Complexity does not equal credibility. Just the opposite in fact. Anyone who has genuine insight will be able to explain to you in simple language exactly what they mean and you will then be able to verify it with known scientific fact. If they can’t.....well, what do you think?"

This is why i choose to explain things in detail but at a level everyone can understand. it is usually the troll or the Ney Sayers that try to use words that you can't understand or even dishonest tactics to discredit/belittle you.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4233 on: April 23, 2018, 11:52:03 AM »
Keep things adjustable when building the Figuera device.  since the primaries are exact copies of each other plus putting them on bobbins allows you to have adjustment done on the fly.

also on part G once it is wound will not be so adjustable so by using the adjustable post like below will allow you to adjust the balance of the primaries if needed. they are cheap as in a few dollars and save a hell of a lot of time.

taking the screw out and flipping the tab allows you to use it much better than the original way.

now it can be slid very easily, they can take fairly thick wire and a lot of amps to boot. this makes it easier to adjust since part G is one continuous wind.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4234 on: April 23, 2018, 11:43:02 PM »
In the Figuera device he used DC to excite his primaries just like a standard generator does to excite it's N&S fields not ac that some people seam to think. if one was to use AC there would be all kinds of phasing issues to deal with and this is unacceptable and a royal pain in the backside. not only would that cause hysteresis and eddy currants in the primaries and this is detrimental to it's magnetic field output. since the time it takes to plow through the resistance of the wire and the flipping of the magnetic domains are far to long to respond in any reasonable manor. thus would be darn near useless in the FIguera device.

by using DC in his device it eliminated all hysteresis and eddy currants but also the phasing issue involved in using AC. the secondary has these effects that is why he split the cores up the way he did. using DC allowed him to get the highest possible magnetic field from his primaries without all the said draw backs. by using DC and winding them specifically as electromagnets he was able to attain the highest magnetic field possible with the fastest rise in magnetic strength.

since he used DC and did not reduce his primaries down below half way this technique allowed the primaries to be reduced and increased to full potential with very short response time keeping a very orderly rise and fall of the primaries to remain in complete unison throughout this action.

just think about that for a while with some common sense. if one was to try to use AC in their primaries,  the time it took to rip through the resistance and to flip all the magnetic domains which would never happen because before the all the domains got flipped the AC is traveling the other way so the resistance and the flipping of the domains starts all over again. so what you would end up with is a rather weak electromagnet that gets hot from eddy currants and hysteresis. the time involved to do this process is crazy slow and coherency between the Electric fields would be lost and induction would fall to that of just the rising electromagnet.

now with that common sense still flowing by using DC that never reverses the Electromagnets do not have to deal with eddy currants or any hysteresis ill effects nor any phasing issues to contend with. when the DC electromagnet is brought up to proper field strength and reduced to just clear the secondary then back to full potential the time frame of that action is so minute that the primary Electric fields are able to remain in complete coherency. thus induction is at it's maximum and the output is the square of the two primary electromagnets compared to two plain bucking fields (NON COHERENT). very little magnetic domains are flipped in this process once it is at full potential because all Figuera did was reduce the currant to just clear the secondary then back to full potential which does not flip the domains like AC would. the electromagnets remain cool and have very fast response time.

in the process of splitting the DC currant both primary electromagnets remain in phase at all times and are just reduced in relation to the secondary and not them selves. since the wall at the collision point of both opposing electromagnets will be quite large the reduction of currant to get the primaries the sweeping action across the secondary will be quite small. not to mention the opposing field of the secondary once currant starts to flow in the secondary and the load will be sandwiched in between those two primary electromagnet. refer to the squirrel cage motor action Doug referred and apply it to this scenario.

the primary electromagnets cause the E fields but it is the relative motion of the primaries being reduced and increased with the opposing secondary fields between them that induces currant flow into the secondary and the load. once the polarization takes place and currant begins to flow the primaries and the secondaries part ways and it is the primaries becomes the motive force that exerts motion into the secondary provided the circuit is closed with resistance of it's own. ( ie a load)

thus in compliance according to Faraday's laws of induction ANY rise or FALL of the magnetic field will cause induction no matter how small.

thanks for everything Doug, to bad nobody else listened to the wisdom brought to the table.

If you still cant understand what i have just laid out in plain English in a logical and descriptive manor i would suggest you chose another device or field to pursue because your failing at this one.

Marathonman
« Last Edit: April 24, 2018, 02:15:08 AM by marathonman »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4234 on: April 23, 2018, 11:43:02 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4235 on: April 24, 2018, 11:47:18 AM »
Figuera  mainly avoids to use of magnets to creates alternating field. His version however is not fully motionless as he like Nicola Tesla DID NOT HAVE ADVANCED ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS IN HIS TIME AS WE HAVE IN OUR TIME NOW.

So Figuera device a means to convert D.C to Pulsing DC or better still AC which is exactly what Mechanic Alternators produces as the magnets on the rotor is arranged North-South-North South and on and on like that.

The opposite winding  is meant to negate Lenz but you Can aslo {Like I have done} practically negate Lenz with RESONANCE and thus use little copper wire. High frequency application plus resonance will allow anyone to use little materials to generate kilowatts of Power.

Yes the output at low voltage high current will be in high frequency which will then needs High Frequency diodes to rectify and further needs Inverter circuit.

Make it simple brothers and sisters as YOUNG only needs to understand the Figuera Gen basic fundamental working principles for you to know what to add and subtract in view of new era available Electronic components.

Why will I keep to tidious mechanical lane when more Super easy, efficient and effective motionless Route is available!e?

May God bless Donald Lee Smith!!!!

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4236 on: April 24, 2018, 07:09:41 PM »
That's really hilarious given the fact that 6 months ago you PM'ed me that i was completely right and you were wrong. maybe i should post that PM as i did save it to let the world know what type of a person you are.

the Figuera device is NOT a DON Smith energy resonant device and even states in the patent. he observed a dynamo and made it stationary that is it. he used two opposing electromagnets to mimic the high intensity field of a regular dynamo then reducing one and raising the other to induce movement into the secondary.
if you think those crasy thoughts why not get your own thread and not ruin or confuse this thread.

good day and good luck, you'll need all you can get.

PS, the opposing primary electromagnet DO NOT negate Lenz effect, sorry you are incorrect again. as a mater of fact Figuera uses it to his advantage and you would of known this if you would of done proper research not fly by week end thing.

Facts are Facts and mine are backed up with real Physics and almost 6 years of bench work.

Marathonman

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4236 on: April 24, 2018, 07:09:41 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4237 on: April 24, 2018, 08:15:56 PM »
This is a quote from Aubrey Scoons that replicated Royal Rife's work;

"DON’T BE FOOLED!
Complexity does not equal credibility. Just the opposite in fact. Anyone who has genuine insight will be able to explain to you in simple language exactly what they mean and you will then be able to verify it with known scientific fact. If they can’t.....well, what do you think?"
This is why i choose to explain things in detail but at a level everyone can understand. it is usually the troll or the Ney Sayers that try to use words that you can't understand or even dishonest tactics to discredit/belittle you.

I will leave it to the readers to decide for your selves.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4238 on: April 25, 2018, 09:26:36 PM »
Another very highly overlooked FACT.
 in 1908 the patent offices required you "the patentee" to have a small working device to display the working principals of your patent. what this means is the patent office required you to have a working device unlike today you could patent a French fart if it smells different. no offence to the French.

Figuera had a working device (1902) patents that he sold to the bankers. his 1908 patent was more than likely the patent and working device that powered his home in Barcelona Spain at the time of his death. it was recorded that it powered his house lights, a 20 HP motor and the street light around his house.
So i could really care less if anyone says that this device can't work because i know better. if you dig hard enough the truth will eventually come to light.
simple test at your home will set the truth free.

Marathonman

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4239 on: April 25, 2018, 09:54:28 PM »
So basically what part G does as the brush rotates is change the ratio of magnetic field to the amount of currant.

this fact is the effects of an inductor taken from a static device that opposes the currant for a short time then rising to a steady state. so in order to get the same reaction of the inductor but at a continuous basis we need to take it from a static device to an active device.

 so lets talk about this since a few are still having a little trouble with this statement.

Quote from Wikipedia;
"Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current."

now would you not think that as the brush rotates around the core is not an "Alteration" of the circuit. ? and would it not change the magnetic field increasing or decreasing which is the ratio of magnetic field to currant, why sure in hell it is.

this is why the part G inductor changes the currant as the brush rotates around the core. it changes the ratio of magnetic field per the amount of currant increasing and decreasing the size of the inductor on both sides of the brush separated by two North><North magnetic fields allowing them to remain completely separate but in complete unison.

the currant running through the wire causes a magnetic field around the wires and it is this magnetic field that strikes the winding next to it that causes the reverse EMF to form that opposes the original currant flow. the more winding's that magnetically link to the circuit the more opposition to currant flow. thus the reverse is true, the less winding's that magnetically link to the system the less opposition to currant flow.
So as the brush rotates around the core making contact with more than one contact at a time in a make before break scenario, the winding's are magnetically linking or unlinking to each side of the circuit on each side of the positive brush where the North North fields keep them separate. allowing them to increase or decrease in size thus changing the ratio of magnetic field to currant thus changing the currant on a complete orderly basis.

another fact is while the inductor on one side of the brush is increasing in size it is releasing the reduced potential into the system feeding the increasing primary electromagnet while the side of the inductor that is reducing in size is storing into the magnetic field to feed the next rising primary electromagnet.



Marathonman
« Last Edit: Today at 01:24:30 AM by marathonman »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #4239 on: April 25, 2018, 09:54:28 PM »
Sponsored links:




 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at:


OneLink