Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

movieclipsfree

movie clips free

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 482320
  • *Total Topics: 14218
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 148
  • *Total: 154

Facebook

Author Topic: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity  (Read 101195 times)

Offline tim123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #300 on: March 20, 2014, 05:08:23 PM »
Hello tim, how it's going for you, did you get what you needed to go forward?  Did you acheive o.u. on the bar?

Hi Khwartz,
  I've just received some mosfets to build a new high-power ZVS driver... I now have a SWR meter too.

My feeling is that my SWR meter will not accurately measure the output from my IRF450 pulse-driver - it needs a sine-wave. The pulse-driver's too inefficient too.

I did test the bar-gen with a 2 layered coil...

With a 2-layered coil - which cancels out 99% of capacitive coupling - the Vialle effect does not occur.

Single-layer coil - wire goes from one end of the coil to the other and stops.
There is a (full) voltage difference between the 2 ends of the coil - and hence the 2 bars...
Vialle effect occurs...

         Tube A             Tube B
           50v                   0v
      =========  ========
   IN -------------------------------- OUT
   50v                                         0v

2-layer coil - wire goes to the end of the coil, and then back again.
The voltage drop across the wire averages out.
No Vialle effect.

              Tube A            Tube B
                 25v                25v
            =========  ========                 Voltage drop...
50v  IN  ---------------------------------| 25v       > (50-25 = 25v)
0v OUT  ---------------------------------|              < (25-0  = 25v)


This does NOT mean that the device may not have an OU mode of operation, BUT it does mean that capacitive coupling is an important part of the device / effect - and without it - nothing happens.

The fact that there is no resonance, and virtually no output from the bars with a 2 layered coil means, I think, that M. Vialle's theory of operation is incorrect - as the varying magnetic field alone does not cause the effect.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/rvproject/html/principervgen.htm

The device with a 2-layer coil is an effective induction heater though. After the tests - the bars were hot.

Thinking about it - I could test the opposite. If I wire the coil up differently, I could cancel out the magnetic field - leaving only the capacitive effect...

Anyhow - it's clear that it'll only work with a 1-layer coil.

I still want to find and build a good efficient sine-wave (inverting) driver for it - and make the measurements properly - but I'm not sure which circuit to use... Could use some advice on that TBH...

I have achieved o.u. "global COP" on my own activity (see our MPs) the first week of March but need to be continued ;)

Eh?

:)
Regards, Tim

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #301 on: March 26, 2014, 02:31:43 AM »
Hi tim, sorry for late response :/

Very nice to know you still going forward on the experiment :)

Still I don't very comprehend how you're so sure to conclude to capacitive effect, while 2 or more layers have been said destroying harmonics and so avoid anyway the Vialle's effect :/

In addition to this, still 1 layer, at the opposite,  will work even foiled in a aluminium sheet, grounded or not. So, in this case, how capacitive coupling could occur? Between what and what? (Don't hesitate to join draws or schematics to illustrate cause I still very not follow your reasoning :/ ).

For the "overunity COP activity", didn't you received from me any PM about? 

Best regards,  Khwartz.


Offline tim123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #302 on: March 26, 2014, 08:56:51 PM »
Hi Khwartz :)
  this project has helped me forward in many ways. I've learned a lot.
 - I've bought & read the books on the UK Ham Radio course - so I can understand RF better.
 - I've bought an SWR meter, a CB radio and an antenna tuner (ATU)
 - I've built my first antenna - which works really well (SWR 1.08)
 - I built the IRF450 pulse-driver.

Capacitive coupling is *definitely* occurring in the Vialle device - and it is because of the single layer coil. With such an arrangement - capacitive coupling is certain.

I am not saying that it's not OU - I've not been able to test that yet.

No, I did not receive a PM...  ???

Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #303 on: March 27, 2014, 09:20:09 PM »
Hi tim! Nice to see you progress in anything :P

For "capacitive coupling", could be it occurs, but for me you still haven't demonstrated that is the "real why" the Vialle effect occurs: IT IS NOT BECAUSE TWO PHENOMENONS LOOKS SYNCHRONISED THEY ARE LINKED! ;)

Still as I see it: the Vialle effect could occur BECAUSE of very thin harmonics like Biganos looks having demonstrated, if I remember well it was him. And as BlueDragon, if I remember well too it is him who wrote this: any multiple layers destroys these harmonics.

Anyway, please I really really need to understand: why folding the single layer in an aluminium foild won't avoid mostly if any capacitive coupling? Why this test already praticed by Pascal, JLN and others, is not relevant for you? Please, really, go into physics more precisely if needed, with schematics and so on if needed too.  8)

Infinite Exponential Happiness. Khwartz.

PS: OK,  I will check for the PM why you didn't receive it :)


Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #304 on: March 27, 2014, 09:32:55 PM »
Here the PM you were supposed to received (copy-pasted from my sent box) ; )

Quote

Quote
Quote from: tim123 on February 23, 2014, 07:51:58 PM]
Hi Khwartz,

Hi tim,
Sorry for late reply :/

Quote
  it's very kind of you to offer to help with costs :), perhaps if i can achieve something worthwhile, in time... I'm ok for money really...
Very nice to know that :)


Quote
Spend it on buying yourself a sig-gen...?

The problem for me is time!

I'm already working since few years to try to make a system "overunity": my own activity!  Lol and until now my "global COP" (compare to basic needs for famuly and personal fonctioning) is still underunity :/ so that why theoretically I should not be supposed to have any other activity until my family could have enough to survive.

But true Free Energy is an very important Quest,  imo, and it makes for me a diversion to change my mind too.

But I am used to fix and repair material things at work so it won't change my mind if I do experiments for now, intellectual work only better change my mind ;) So I am not in a hurry to buy anything for now too...

Quote
:)
Tim
Khwartz.

BTW, We have had a "Global Overunity COP" in our activity this month :p

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #304 on: March 27, 2014, 09:32:55 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline tim123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #305 on: April 04, 2014, 12:36:51 PM »
BTW, We have had a "Global Overunity COP" in our activity this month :p

Hi Khwartz,
  sorry for my late reply... :)
I finally understand what you're saying. lol. Glad to hear it.

No progress to report - getting sidetracked with house-building, work, etc...

Regards, Tim

Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #306 on: April 05, 2014, 02:30:51 PM »
Hehe, OK ;)

Good progresses on your other duties :)

Infinite Exponential Happiness,
Khwartz.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #306 on: April 05, 2014, 02:30:51 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #307 on: April 08, 2014, 10:54:50 PM »
Translation of the

5th Q&A of the present FAQ of the website on the work of Richard

*** I HAVE ONLY 1.8MHZ AT THE OUTPUT! :/ ***

http://richard-vialle.info/

(In agreement to the licence terms of the website, already published and taking no liability for any error of translation or modifications in between of the original terms of licence or of the original terms I translate here. These warnings applies to any writting by me on this website. )

----
Q : J'ai construit un oscillateur amplifié de type "ROYER" comme Jean-Louis Naudin, mais je n'ai que 1.8Mhz à la sortie d'un transistor
• Q: I built a "ROYER" amplified oscillator as Jean-Louis Naudin, but I have only 1.8Mhz at the output of a transistor


R :  C'est normal, car c'est lié au principe du montage de l'oscillateur de Royer.
• R: It is normal, because it is related to the working principle of the Royer oscillator.

Si vous avez un oscilloscope : Mettre CH1 sur un pin de la bobine et CH2 sur l'autre pin de la bobine et la masse au moins de l'alimentation.
• If you have an oscilloscope: put CH1 on a connection of the coil and CH2 on the other connection of the coil and the mass at least and the neutral point of power supply.

La fréquence se calcule à partir de la période séparant les alternances de ch1 et ch2...
• The frequency is recalculated from the period separating the alternations of ch1 and ch2...

Il ne faut pas non plus connecter une bornes de la bobine à la masse si l'alimentation n'est pas différentielle et découplée de la terre sinon cela court-circuite une branche de l'oscillateur, toujours pour la même raison.
• You should not either connect one side of the coil to the mass if the power supply is not differential and not decoupled from the ground otherwise it short-circuit a branch of the oscillator, always for the same reason.


Si vous avez un fréquencemètre : prenez la mesure directement en sortie du barreau, la frequence de sortie est celle de l'entrée, et donc du montage "ROYER".
• If you have a frequencymeter: take the measure directly out of the bar, the frequency of the output is the one of the input

-----

Infinite Exponential Happiness,
Khwartz.

Offline tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1276
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #308 on: August 01, 2014, 02:18:36 PM »
bonjour

@Khwartz

en cherchant le dossier sur tantatron

j'ai decouvert que albert a cree sa propore societe : tantatron

( ses travaux sont maintenant totalement sous NDA )

mais je peux fournir ses coordonnées

A+


PS
societe de cote de toulouse

Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #309 on: August 02, 2014, 02:08:46 PM »
Salut Tagor.

Merci beaucoup pour ces infos et je veux bien que tu m'envoies ses coordonnées en message perso car cela tombe très bien ; en plus Toulouse n'est pas loin de Bordeaux :)

Cordialement.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #309 on: August 02, 2014, 02:08:46 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1276
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #310 on: September 02, 2014, 04:51:40 PM »


( ses travaux sont maintenant totalement sous NDA )



j'ai fais une grossiere erreur d'interpretation ... il n'y a pas de NDA sur ses travaux
( cela concernait uniquement les contrats avec l'armée )

Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #311 on: September 03, 2014, 01:46:52 PM »
:) merci pour la précision :)


Offline Khwartz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 611
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #312 on: September 13, 2015, 06:42:04 PM »
@ Tim123

Hello Tim123, did you finished your home work? ;) did you continue to test the Richard Vialle Autogen?

Offline tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1276
Re: Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity
« Reply #313 on: October 09, 2016, 05:21:52 PM »
I realized an interview of the retired physicist Richard VIALLE (french), presenting his negative mass theory, a new model of gravity and of the

apres une longue cooperation avec Vialle , pascuser a intensement critiqué celui ci à cause de son manque de rigueur

vous pourrez constater le manque de rigueur de pascuser ici :

http://overunity.com/16760/mister-nader-hoville-you-are-very-very-very-wrong/msg493440/#msg493440


 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: