Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Tesla induction device  (Read 24239 times)

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Tesla induction device
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2011, 07:10:38 PM »
Hello, everyone, I have carefully read this paper also, a lot of common with the Tesla Induction device but also with the TPU, and yes in the last chapter the device presented is a TPU !!! A lenzless one way magnetic TPU !!!

So I have decided to make some test with some toroid I have bought for some project (while I wait for my shield, I play with several stuff and other device involving toroid and trafos)...

This was with a toroid and windings like chapter 3 in trafos section...

I can CONFIRM the one way induction magnetic diode (I don't tell is OU) but the theory is right, but since Ls (the primary) is wind on a open path, the inductance is very low, (I literally short circuited my 12V 8 Amps trafos)
after I have build a reactor to limit my input current...)
The fun is when I use L2 (the secondary ) as input no EMF is generated in Ls !!!
Then one way induction...

I have no time (since I deal with the Tesla device) and (especially money) to build the TPU version at this time, but I have my idea how to build it, and to tune it (correcting ampere turns, saturation level, magnetizing current, permeability, etc...)

Edit: Here a schematic of my setup, more schematics will come soon !!!
« Last Edit: June 23, 2011, 07:49:05 PM by SchubertReijiMaigo »

Jack Noskills

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Tesla induction device
« Reply #16 on: June 27, 2011, 02:13:47 PM »
Does it matter where the secondary is located, does it have to be right under primary ? If you put another secondary in the free portion of toroid does it give out same amount of power ? If it works then you can wound secondary all over toroid, and primary on top of that.

What about switchable inductance, if you wound another primary so that it is crossed with first primary and connect those using diodes and cap as shown in Utkin paper, would it work ?

Trafo would then have a cross inside a circle, a mason symbol. We could call this the free masonformer, as it would output free power by itself lol.

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Tesla induction device
« Reply #17 on: June 27, 2011, 08:00:05 PM »
Quote
Does it matter where the secondary is located, does it have to be right under primary ?

Yeah, the should be on one leg of the trafo, not the whole trafo, for one way induction.

Quote
If you put another secondary in the free portion of toroid does it give out same amount of power ?

I don't know the power, the voltage is anecdotal (due to flux leakage in air) and amperage very low, when I short the secondary the whole toroid make huge noise like it's fully saturated...

Quote
If it works then you can wound secondary all over toroid, and primary on top of that.

No, the toroid must be wired like the diagram above if not, then full Lenz action in both direction, no decoupling...

Quote
What about switchable inductance, if you wound another primary so that it is crossed with first primary and connect those using diodes and cap as shown in Utkin paper, would it work ?

I have not tested the switchable L yet, and it requires scope to analyse data, I have no scope, I have tested the asymmetric trafos by curiosity while I wait for my shield.

Quote
Trafo would then have a cross inside a circle, a mason symbol. We could call this the free masonformer, as it would output free power by itself lol.

Yeah, this is for decoupling phenomena, the toroid is for closing Ls path and the center one is for secondary MMF, for the mason stuff, it will be the first time they become useful in this world...

Doug1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
Re: Tesla induction device
« Reply #18 on: July 04, 2011, 02:55:54 PM »
And another thread dies.Pitty it's such a simple device platform possibly a good way to produce a Juel theif of size to operate several other teriods in the mains power range to run appliances of real use. I at least expected to see an argument that anything that expands your use of mains power without paying extra for it is stealing from the utillities. Guess all is fine and dandy in shangrila.No need for a magnetic feild capacitor the voltage type are doing just fine.
 

DeepCut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: Tesla induction device
« Reply #19 on: July 04, 2011, 09:16:13 PM »
Well the thread ain't dead, i've only noticed it coz you bumped it today, reading the paper right now, lots of ideas there.

Hopefully others will see the thread now and read the patent and the document.


mrclean

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: Tesla induction device
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2011, 02:45:35 AM »
hi guys, cant seem to get much response on this.
--couldnt find a Smith replication thread..

Here is my recent work on Don Smith

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op8HzKc5yao

Just wondering if anyones workin on this, or any input from anyone. Im doing this with very little knowledge

SchubertReijiMaigo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: Tesla induction device
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2011, 08:12:06 PM »
Quote
And another thread dies.

No, dying, I have just received the shield, I search how to cut this into two half properly now, after this, protocol, calculation and experiment(s) will be made.