Wayne,

I notice that you haven't answered my questions but I don't really care.

If the only thing you knew was that we were moving the weight (just the weight) completley free - you would realize you were seeing the potential source for abundant free energy that this world needs.

Sorry but I have to correct you here.  Seeing a weight move up and down in a repeating cycle on a machine means nothing.  It does not demonstrate the production of energy at all.

Here is what I care about:  When do you plan on doing a bona fide real working demo of your system?  You mention a model with a 25 kilowatt output?  Will you being doing a demo of that?  If not, how much power output?  With whatever power output you do plan on demoing, how are you going to demo that?

What do you envision for a demo?  I mean the location, what you will show, how it will be shown, who will verify it, what will it entail, etc, etc?

If you can answer those questions with substance, and give a date, that will give the readers here something to look forward to.

Thanks,

MileHigh

MileHigh.
it is producing contineously 30 Watts on the 2 red bulbs above the Wattmeter...

So these 30 Watts are the free energy output .

Have again a look at the videos I posted on my youtube channel or
go to the overunity.com homepage and let them all play in a row...

Regards, Stefan.

Stefan,

Unfortunately all gravity and buoyancy based free energy propositions have been unsuccessful as far as I am aware.  If you want to accept seeing two lit light bulbs and some numbers on an LCD display as constituting proof that the system is working as claimed that is your prerogative.  I don't share your opinion.

MileHigh

Stefan,

Unfortunately all gravity and buoyancy based free energy propositions have been unsuccessful as far as I am aware.  If you want to accept seeing two lit light bulbs and some numbers on an LCD display as constituting proof that the system is working as claimed that is your prerogative.  I don't share your opinion.

MileHigh

Yes, but you also did not see it yet in person,
so your opinion is also prerogative.

As hard skeptic Mark Dansie and his associates claim that it fully
works, I just tend to believe them !

Also the device seems not to be so simple as the 2 Travis effect videos
with the pichers under water
show it...

If you look at the video from Mark Dansie you can see, that he has a "Valve-tree"
and that there are probably many partial cycles involved, otherwise he would not need so many valves..

Regards, Stefan.

Are you deciding this ?  I guess not !

No, it’s a suggestion since this forum supposedly is suppose to be Open Source?
Maybe you should refine the theme here for overunity.com because you're confusing me now.
But then again I think you're just pulling my chain considering the smiley faces? :-)

Here is a collage of some pictures of the ZED device which was posted at Peswiki.com

I hope it is okay to put this here as a mirror.

Many thanks.

Wayne
You have to open source and you need successful replications to prove that your Technology Works
No one can steal your design............. if I make your device it would be illegal for me to sell it without your permission.

And as for other companies trying to claim your idea, I don't see an argument there, you have invented something so unique that has never been seen before, the choice is yours but as we have seen before many times on this forum if you don't Open source the likelihood is that nothing will ever become of your device,  we have all seen it time and time again over many years, so again it's up to you to really change history

 A quick couple of notes:
The system you see is three complete and separate systems:
(1)The ZED operates with four valves - it is quite simple.
(2)The hoses and wires are for measuring pressures and collecting Data.
(3)The rest of the valves are for an "initialization" process - When we were reviewed - I was required to
to completely empty the system of all air (pressure) water, and hydraulic fluid (pressure)
and then re- set the system up from scratch - this was expected - but a pain in the tail.

So my team designed an automated process - to both empty the system and then refill it, and then one button turns the whole thing on. and after Initialization - it is physically disconnected from the source.

Now a key point - initialization only happens once, it is just to show the skeptic. The system can be stopped and restarted as many times as desired - with no additional inputs.

Other than pushing the start button LOL -

This ZED is a three layer system- and we monitor two aspects of each layer and track the data - it produces a pretty clear picture of what is going on inside.

We are further along in our research than anyone on this forum understands yet.
 
OPEN SOURCE comments:
I do have a reason for posting here - and not disclosing:
 
Yes we have all labored hard - and we do expect to fund our business, and if the Beta process is not funded - no one will work on a project that will be legally taken from them.

To be clear Our hearts are as like those who want open sourcing - with many of the frontiers this process has revealed - we are in a unique position to effect the world.

Our License agreement is nearly an open source, it definitely meets the intention of open sourcing - getting the power out to the people - eliminated emissions and bringing energy independence.

It empowers those who have prepared, and have the desire and ability to make this happen in short fashion.

While many people have been arguing, other have been setting up meetings, for such an end.

A NEW FRONTIER:
We will not go by the waist side, we will never surrender, never give up.

Do not think for one moment that this has been an easy journey - but certainly an adventure!

I promise, you who wish open sourcing will not be disappointed.

My apologie to Jim for the Troll comment.

We are in this together, and some questions will not be answered except to those that need to know.

Wayne Travis