Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 81922
  • *Latest: bobdring

  • *Total Posts: 490792
  • *Total Topics: 14441
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 226
  • *Total: 230

Facebook

Author Topic: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8  (Read 475377 times)

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5398
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1050 on: August 12, 2015, 03:15:19 AM »
Hi Mags,

Just ran across your YouTube Videos, etc. this site, spent last 3 hours reading 70 pages here and wonder if you could give me the specs on that Ballast you use.  Your 10 hz output mystifies me.  Is it a standard or switching ballast?


Thanks,
Ben

Did you mean the converter I used with the lasersaber motor? It was used with my Lil Tc also, but no vid on that.

If so, it is a product Radioshack has, maybe had now, used to run lighting electroluminescent strips they sold also.  2AA and 160v out loaded. If I remember it peaked above 230v unloaded or lighter loads. And using an inductive amplifier, thats what they call it, from a telephone system repair kit, you can hear the freq of the inverter/converter.  So it is in the audible range.

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1050 on: August 12, 2015, 03:15:19 AM »

Offline k4zep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 643
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1051 on: August 12, 2015, 03:44:07 AM »
Did you mean the converter I used with the lasersaber motor? It was used with my Lil Tc also, but no vid on that.

If so, it is a product Radioshack has, maybe had now, used to run lighting electroluminescent strips they sold also.  2AA and 160v out loaded. If I remember it peaked above 230v unloaded or lighter loads. And using an inductive amplifier, thats what they call it, from a telephone system repair kit, you can hear the freq of the inverter/converter.  So it is in the audible range.

Mags

In one of your videos, driving a Gabrial device, you used a Ballasts you called it.  Put out about 800VAC into the input of the coil.............I think it was a switched florescent ballast.

Just wondering. 


Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5398
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1052 on: August 12, 2015, 04:55:28 AM »
Oh yeah. That was what i used for the lil tc.

Been a while.

It is from an older printer/scanner that used a long thin neon tube in the scanner. It is about 1kv out. 12v and some may be 24v in. Have a few of them from salvaged scanners.


Mags

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5398
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1053 on: August 12, 2015, 04:56:40 AM »
Which vid was it?

Mags



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1054 on: August 13, 2015, 11:35:16 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline leonardocunha

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1055 on: August 19, 2015, 12:54:23 AM »
Hello, everyone!!
Power Companies CAN CHARGE us for using excessive REACTIVE POWER (resulted from low Power Factor devices).
https://www.npower.com/business/help-and-support/customer-information/reactive-power/
https://www.psoklahoma.com/info/news/ReactivePowerCharge.aspx

Do this mean that Bi-Toroid Transformer (by Thane Heins) and other similar OU devices will INCREASE our electric bill?
Here in Brazil, consuming excessive Reactive Power even represents penalty.
My intention on replicating BiTT (PF = zero) was for reducing my power billing, not opposite.
Reactive Power can not be measured by Wattmeter (kW), but Companies measure it by other way (kVAR).
Is there a way for overcome this? Or do I just misunderstood all those things?

New topic for this discussion:
http://overunity.com/15983/reactive-power-bill/msg459456/#msg459456

Offline MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 930
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1056 on: May 14, 2017, 09:11:03 AM »
Hello, everyone!!
Power Companies CAN CHARGE us for using excessive REACTIVE POWER (resulted from low Power Factor devices).
https://www.npower.com/business/help-and-support/customer-information/reactive-power/
https://www.psoklahoma.com/info/news/ReactivePowerCharge.aspx

Do this mean that Bi-Toroid Transformer (by Thane Heins) and other similar OU devices will INCREASE our electric bill?
Here in Brazil, consuming excessive Reactive Power even represents penalty.
My intention on replicating BiTT (PF = zero) was for reducing my power billing, not opposite.
Reactive Power can not be measured by Wattmeter (kW), but Companies measure it by other way (kVAR).
Is there a way for overcome this? Or do I just misunderstood all those things?

New topic for this discussion:
http://overunity.com/15983/reactive-power-bill/msg459456/#msg459456
If bit toroid divice or other realy have overunity, then you can run it on transistors and make selfrunning. And reactive power can be remowed with capasitors. Capasitors corects shits angle and remove reactive usage of power.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1056 on: May 14, 2017, 09:11:03 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 930
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1057 on: May 14, 2017, 09:54:08 AM »

I don't know about a toaster... but I know this:

When a light bulb starts from cold, it has very low resistance.  It can be as low as 16 Ohms!!  So when it starts up the 'kick' (ala Steven Mark) shoots across the tungsten carrying alot of 'impulse' (voltage, current, and whatever else EMF is -really- comprised of).  Then, as the light bulb starts to heat up , the resistance increases (and thus the current consumption decreases).  I think a 60W light bulb will climb up to the vicinity of 500 Ohms to 2K Ohms after it heats up.

It's possible a toaster has a similar temperature dependent effect, so we'll need to consider this during any sort of modeling or calculations unless the toaster resistance is experimentally derived.  I doubt it's fixed, (I think toaster has temp-dependent resistance), but I don't know for sure.  I'm just basing this on the behavior of light bulbs.

Toster not have same efect like lamp. Toster almost not change resistance. Because it not products light, like lamp and it resistance is always almost same. It works wery close to resistor parameters.
Ok. lamp say can increse resistance 5 times. Toster can increse resistance 2 times.
If toster consuming at 120 volts of it nominal voltage 200 W, that means, that 200\120=1.6666 A. R=U\I=120\1.666=72 omh. So in 0.5 A let say it resistance 30 omh. So toster consumib power is. First U=IxR=0.5x30=15 V/ P =IxR=15x0.5=7.5 W. So primary consuming 120-15=105 V and 0.5 A, that is 52.5 W.




Offline MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 930
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1058 on: May 14, 2017, 10:33:24 AM »
Rather than start a new thread, I'll just ask the question:
Can one's electric bill be lowereed by back-feeding the output of a Gabriel Fevice to a wall outlet?  Either the same plug as the tap-off point, or, another plug on the same electrical circuit?
Thusly:
        ------------------------------------
        |                                             |
       \ /                                            /\
    Outlet -----> Current        Gabriel----
                       Limiter-----> Device

My thinking:
The sin wave wall current is always in phase,
and, the COP is supposed to be 8 or more.

Ultimate question, which I've never tried:
Can the hot and neutral leads of a wall plug be connected directly together if the whole power system is in phase?

If so, this should theoretically work?  I have yet to try with full voltage from the wall, but I do have several transformers to step down voltage.

--Lee
Beter run on transistors and made self looop selfrunning. Posible use and invertor and charger to feed invertot, but then may need addd capasitor to primary to corect power factor, because maybe this divice use big reactive power and if not corect power factor, then power may not go to invertor back. Capasitor need chose, then is minimum amps is cunsumed. I guest for Gabriel divice capasitor value can be bettwen 2 and 20 mikrofarads 400 V. And at this stage power factor must be 1 or close to 1 (or 100 precents).

Offline MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 930
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1059 on: May 14, 2017, 03:23:37 PM »
Look like some bad news:  :-[ according my red (power curve) Current*Voltage...
Look like my version is not OU anymore... But rather an energy destroyer...  :o :o
Let's me explain,  at the input side PF is nearly 1 and the output is 1, but if you look carefully the two curve look like it need 2.5 time energy   :o :o to power a load, ie for one Watt at secondary you need 2.5 Watts (not VA)...
Question at 1 Yen here: What I have missed here !? It's crazy...  ???
How to turn in OU state !? (Adding turns, because my turn ratio is under one so for any trun ratio above 1 it switch in OU state !? Crazy)
Or the current at secondary is not measurable by conventional meter (Cold or Radiant current) I think I become mad here...

First Graph is INPUT and second OUPUT:
You right. Power factor is near to 1 in this first picture. Now look red sine. Input and output. In input is much more power, than on output.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1059 on: May 14, 2017, 03:23:37 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 930
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1060 on: May 14, 2017, 04:28:20 PM »
Hooked up scope last night, very disappointed as i only get 10 deg phase angle between current and volts on input with 120w output at 120vac out into two 60w bulbs.  Power calc gave 158w in with 120w out. 
Tried to compare phase of input volts to output volts with same 120w load but it appears to be in phase or 180deg out depending on polarity I connect scope probe.  Tesla patent mentioned phase shift but I am not seeing it at all, anybody know if tesla actually built the transfo described in the patent?
Perhaps if I could run it at 800hz or something phase shift would appear?  Any ideas on this are appreciated. 
-boots
Seems Gabriel divice not have overunity. It making curent pulses and then powermetter incorect show results. And were author of this divice show overunity 1:8? Why not any photos or videos, or explanation, that load he use, then get overunity 8?

Offline vinny15

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8
« Reply #1061 on: May 26, 2017, 11:46:26 PM »
Role of resonance in Gabriel device ??   Lenz's law is being bucked in this device.


 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: