Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: i have proof!  (Read 49148 times)

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2011, 05:53:16 AM »
I, for one, think that, on the contrary, your talk is irrelevant and clutters the thread devoted to discussing a theory. I've already expressed that opinion in several different ways but you're ignoring it and continue with the irrelevances. I'm no advocate of @Tinsel Koala with whom, many are aware, I've had issues in the past. Nevertheless, as a matter of principle, it has to be understood that when a theory is being discussed and in the course of that discussion certain inexactless in the terminology is uttered (as is usually the case) that should not divert the discussion into a talk about semantics and memorized definitions but the scientific discourse should rather continue unperturbed along its main course.
i don't care...because your opinion is irrelevant to my issue with tinselkoala. mint?

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2011, 06:00:24 AM »
I know, but that's not a discussion. That defies the core essence of a debate.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #47 on: February 09, 2011, 06:03:27 AM »
I know, but that's not a discussion. That defies the core essence of a debate.
tu stultus es... you are not necessary for a discussion between tinselkoala and myself. ::)

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #48 on: February 09, 2011, 06:11:34 AM »
If that's the case, you should leave this discussion dedicated to a theory and should carry on your discussion somewhere else. That's an elementary rule regarding the hygiene of a scientific debate.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #49 on: February 09, 2011, 06:13:08 AM »
If that's the case, you should leave this discussion dedicated to a theory and should carry on your discussion somewhere else. That's an elementary rule regarding the hygiene of a scientific debate.
i'm not in a scientific debate you mental midget... ::) i'm correcting tinselkoala's made up definition of coherent. i'm still waiting on his rebuttal. you're the one wandering off on tangents of logical fallacy and semantics. we've been over this son, try and keep up...

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #50 on: February 09, 2011, 06:15:30 AM »
Of course, you're not in a scientific debate. This is exactly what I'm saying. Therefore, you shouldn't be doing it here.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #51 on: February 09, 2011, 06:18:28 AM »
Of course, you're not in a scientific debate. This is exactly what I'm saying. Therefore, you shouldn't be doing it here.
and you're not in a scientific debate either... ::) thus, you shouldn't be doing it here... ::)
tu stultus es... q.e.d.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #52 on: February 09, 2011, 06:29:09 AM »
In fact, I am. I'm waiting for @Tinsel Koala to present the internal contradictions in the "theory" under discussion and in the meantime I'm trying to teach you some good manners regarding a scientific discourse.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #53 on: February 09, 2011, 06:36:55 AM »
In fact, I am. I'm waiting for @Tinsel Koala to present the internal contradictions in the "theory" under discussion and in the meantime I'm trying to teach you some good manners regarding a scientific discourse.
by calling someone a liar? and then when shown (by the record) that you are completely in error, you refuse to offer a mea culpa? that's how you teach good manners? well, good luck to you with that. ::)