Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 493109
  • *Total Topics: 14500
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 8
  • *Guests: 88
  • *Total: 96

Facebook

Author Topic: i have proof!  (Read 30614 times)

Offline david lambright

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
i have proof!
« on: January 21, 2011, 06:28:10 AM »
hey, this is part of a thesis/ theory that i have been working on forever it seems...i think that these ideas will change physics...i hope you too will find simple answers to the problems that plague the classic and quantum models...  there are 2 energy streams and they are polar by nature....the singularity is split into a ring...this ring is bi-directional, super-fluid and equal, effectively cancelling each other....twist this into an 8 [infinity] and you have two lobes..take a pen...draw an infinity sign...there are 2 streams so draw it again...the streams still cancel each other...take your pen and draw that sign again this time draw  two circles on top of each other and then at the point where you started and draw two more circles finishing the infinity sign...you see the lobes do not cancel now but you have a direction to move from< the point>....move either direction and we have attraction/repulsion  N and S,magnetism etc....movement causes this  attraction/repulsion so one lobe is bigger ...doppler...[that is why one pole is stronger}...so now we see that from the singularity we get a ring [or disc]  bi- dimensional/directional..add movement and you will have time behind you, space ahead....the only reason we experience any of these forces is the difference in lobe size ...due to acceleration/spin,one lobe is dominant [red shift problem]....this theory was written by david lambright on Thur.1/20/2011... we KNOW about super fluidity, conductivity etc...these forces are all easily manipulated...convection is temperature dependent  but bi-directional....the floor you  stand on consider even or rest temperature, and one foot =1 degree....bring a point into the room five degrees warmer, and you will have a spike or if colder a pit...vortex/anti vortex...convection pulls down the point till it reaches an even temp...this is the same mechanism that is gravity....one lobe bigger than the other to create the attraction/repulsion that we feel as gravity..there are two supreme forces that all the forces arise from ...the math will prove this....    ...the 90 degree or linear to radial interaction;...a particle, at absolute zero, moving through space becomes a line....any interaction with anything takes  energy from it, but since energy can only be transfered,any interaction with a boundary, turns into rotation, bi directionally....there will be a lot more about this and the experiments that led me here....thanks...david 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

i have proof!
« on: January 21, 2011, 06:28:10 AM »

Offline CompuTutor

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2011, 07:59:55 PM »
I'm sorry to do this, really I am.

I see it was written in a free-thought,
"As thoughts come to mind" type of style.

But I couldn't seem to force myself
through that entire Wall-o-Words....

If I sliced in the wrong spot(s) below,
I am sorry about that.

hey,
this is part of a thesis/ theory that i
have been working on forever it seems...
i think that these ideas will change physics...
i hope you too will find simple answers to the problems
that plague the classic and quantum models...

there are 2 energy streams
and they are polar by nature....
the singularity is split into a ring...
this ring is bi-directional,
super-fluid and equal,
effectively cancelling each other....

twist this into an 8 [infinity]
and you have two lobes...
take a pen...draw an infinity sign...
there are 2 streams so draw it again...
the streams still cancel each other...

take your pen and draw that sign again
this time draw two circles on top of each other
and then at the point where you started
draw two more circles finishing the infinity sign...

you see the lobes do not cancel now
but you have a direction to move from <the point>....
move either direction and we have
attraction/repulsion  N and S,magnetism etc....

movement causes this attraction/repulsion
so one lobe is bigger ...doppler...
[that is why one pole is stronger}...

so now we see that from the singularity
we get a ring [or disc] bi-dimensional/directional...
add movement and you will have
time behind you, space ahead...

the only reason we experience any of these forces
is the difference in lobe size ...
due to acceleration/spin,
one lobe is dominant [red shift problem]....

this theory was written by
david lambright on Thur.1/20/2011...

we KNOW about super fluidity, conductivity etc...
these forces are all easily manipulated...

convection is temperature dependent
but bi-directional....
consider the floor you stand on even
or (a) rest temperature,
and one foot = 1 degree....
bring a point into the room five degrees warmer,
and you will have a spike
or if colder a pit...
vortex/anti vortex...
convection pulls down the point till it reaches an even temp...

this is the same mechanism that is gravity....
one lobe bigger than the other to create
the attraction/repulsion that we feel as gravity...

there are two supreme forces that all the forces arise from ...
the math will prove this...
the 90 degree or linear to radial interaction;...

a particle, at absolute zero,
moving through space
becomes a line....
any interaction with anything
takes  energy from it,
but since energy can only be transfered,
any interaction with a boundary,
turns into rotation,
bi directionally....

there will be a lot more about this
and the experiments that led me here....
thanks...
david

This has been been a problem in earlier years,
before computers could easily render almost any
3D representation of interactive linears/logs.

Many families of math were created originally,
just to allow the ability to define something.

But the really hard thing
is finding the simple thing.

There can be no representation
without a few things first.

A point (or more) of reference(s) to view from,
and motion or vector(s) in relation to that/them.

Something as simple as the fact that
differing forms of energy flow in a wire
in opposite directions simultaniously
can be represented in many ways.

But finding the "Simple" way to display it,
and have it be intuitive too is the challange.

Your idea reminds me of older dipole-vectors,
often used in the antenna technology sector.

But again,
it is how to represent your ideas
that may be the challange here.

Communication/language only works,
because we agree on the meaning of words.

Same is true in the many branches of science,
be they (Ideas) represented with math or models.

With each branch of the sciences using
their own "Language" to represent things,
it is no wonder they arrive at the same conclusion
in completely different ways from each other,
but cannot accept each others methods used
to arrive at that identical outcome of data...

Finding a simple model (Like your asserting here)
would go a long way to lowering those barriers.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline david lambright

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2011, 02:36:59 AM »

Offline exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2011, 09:32:31 AM »

No gibberish, please. Only observations, facts and measurements. Theory, after.



Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13556
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2011, 05:23:14 PM »
Proof you have? Let's see it then.


A THEORY does several things: it explains existing phenomena in a coherent manner. Coherent means that it does not contradict what is already known. It also makes NEW PREDICTIONS of phenomena that are not yet understood. That is, any real theory of anything generates testable HYPOTHESES, which are "if-then" statements. If I hook up these components in this manner and put in thus signal for x time, I will then observe Y behaviour, which is NOT already predicted by current existing theories like QED which you are apparently trying to replace.

So, Mr. Lambright, I challenge you to use your "theory" to generate a testable hypothesis that reveals behaviour that is currently unexplained by the standard theories that are being used today to make things like computers and spacecraft and nylon stockings.

If you and your "theory" cannot do that much, then it's not a theory at all, but just a bunch of word salad, with a low-fat vinaigrette dressing.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: i have proof!
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2011, 05:23:14 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2011, 12:49:59 AM »
Coherent means that it does not contradict what is already known.
wrong. coherent means:
–adjective
1. logically connected; consistent: a coherent argument.
2. cohering; sticking together: a coherent mass of sticky candies.
3. having a natural or due agreement of parts; harmonious: a coherent design.
4. Physics, Optics. of or pertaining to waves that maintain a fixed phase relationship, as in coherent light.

So, Mr. Lambright, I challenge you to use your "theory" to generate a testable hypothesis that reveals behaviour that is currently unexplained by the standard theories that are being used today to make things like computers and spacecraft and nylon stockings.
could you specify which unexplained behaviors your red herring pertains to?

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13556
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2011, 10:28:49 AM »
wrong. coherent means:
–adjective
1. logically connected; consistent: a coherent argument.
2. cohering; sticking together: a coherent mass of sticky candies.
3. having a natural or due agreement of parts; harmonious: a coherent design.
4. Physics, Optics. of or pertaining to waves that maintain a fixed phase relationship, as in coherent light.
could you specify which unexplained behaviors your red herring pertains to?

Still playing the fool, I see.
What part of the definitions you have posted do you have trouble understanding? If a "theory" is internally contradictory and does not stick together with what is already known, it's incoherent --- as Lambright's word salad  shows quite clearly.

It's  not up to me to show how somebody else's weak conjectures predict and explain any currently unexplained phenomena. That is what a THEORY is supposed to do. I am asking for the creator of the "Theory" outlined here to list one or more currently unexplained behaviours that his "theory" explains or predicts. Any real theory of anything can do this -- it's what theories do.

Your trolling is getting pretty weak, maybe you need to go back to sleep under your bridge for a while.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: i have proof!
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2011, 10:28:49 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2011, 12:46:07 PM »
Still playing the fool, I see.
What part of the definitions you have posted do you have trouble understanding? If a "theory" is internally contradictory and does not stick together with what is already known, it's incoherent --- as Lambright's word salad  shows quite clearly.

It's  not up to me to show how somebody else's weak conjectures predict and explain any currently unexplained phenomena. That is what a THEORY is supposed to do. I am asking for the creator of the "Theory" outlined here to list one or more currently unexplained behaviours that his "theory" explains or predicts. Any real theory of anything can do this -- it's what theories do.

Your trolling is getting pretty weak, maybe you need to go back to sleep under your bridge for a while.
still engaging in logical fallacies i see...  ::)

what part of the definition do you have trouble understanding? you said "Coherent means that it does not contradict what is already known." nowhere, i repeat, NOWHERE in the definition of that word does it say anything remotely close to what you said. furthermore, something can be coherent without "sticking together with what is already known".  ::) it does this by being logically connected; consistent... as per the definition.

your fallacies are getting pretty weak, maybe you need to brush up...

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2011, 05:42:18 PM »
still engaging in logical fallacies i see...  ::)

what part of the definition do you have trouble understanding? you said "Coherent means that it does not contradict what is already known." nowhere, i repeat, NOWHERE in the definition of that word does it say anything remotely close to what you said. furthermore, something can be coherent without "sticking together with what is already known".  ::) it does this by being logically connected; consistent... as per the definition.

your fallacies are getting pretty weak, maybe you need to brush up...

Never mind sticking together with what's already known. If what is proposed is internally contradictory it is indeed incoherent. Such a proposal isn't even a theory. Internally contradictory proposal is simply called nonsense. You'll shoot down that thing right there if you can point out the internal contradiction.

Offline Bizzy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2011, 06:18:01 PM »

Hi David,
As several have asked is there a way for you to physically prove your theory. Or perhaps give us a simplied diagram of what you are discussing so we can examine and digest it.
Thanks
Bizzy

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: i have proof!
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2011, 06:18:01 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2011, 06:21:17 PM »
Hi David,
As several have asked is there a way for you to physically prove your theory. Or perhaps give us a simplied diagram of what you are discussing so we can examine and digest it.
Thanks
Bizzy

What theory? If @Tinsel Koala is right there's no theory there but plain and simple nonsense. A creation based on internal contradicitons is not a theory. It is nonsense. Nonsense requires no physical proof.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2011, 10:40:33 PM »
Never mind sticking together with what's already known. If what is proposed is internally contradictory it is indeed incoherent. Such a proposal isn't even a theory. Internally contradictory proposal is simply called nonsense. You'll shoot down that thing right there if you can point out the internal contradiction.
tu stultus es... take your red herrings elsewhere. no one said anything about internal contradictions. tinsel said and i quote: "Coherent means that it does not contradict what is already known." this is completely incorrect. a coherent argument, theory or whatever you want to call it, can contradict what is already known... ::) science has done such on a regular and consistent basis throughout its history.


Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2011, 10:48:02 PM »
tu stultus es... take your red herrings elsewhere. no one said anything about internal contradictions. tinsel said and i quote: "Coherent means that it does not contradict what is already known." this is completely incorrect. a coherent argument, theory or whatever you want to call it, can contradict what is already known... ::) science has done such on a regular and consistent basis throughout its history.

Don't lie. @Tinsel Koala said "If a "theory" is internally contradictory ... it's incoherent --- as Lambright's word salad  shows quite clearly."

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2011, 10:54:55 PM »
Don't lie. @Tinsel Koala said "If a "theory" is internally contradictory ... it's incoherent --- as Lambright's word salad  shows quite clearly."
noone was talking to you... tu stultus es.

don't misrepresent... ::) he said that after i posted the correct definition of the word. as the record shows quite clearly... see reply #4 ::)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2011, 11:01:54 PM »
noone was talking to you... tu stultus es.

don't misrepresent... ::) he said that after i posted the correct definition of the word. as the record shows quite clearly... see reply #4 ::)

So, he said that the "theory" in question is self-contradictory and you lied that he didn't.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: i have proof!
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2011, 11:01:54 PM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: