Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82004
  • *Latest: jolyon

  • *Total Posts: 493033
  • *Total Topics: 14497
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 59
  • *Total: 59

Facebook

Author Topic: i have proof!  (Read 30556 times)

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2011, 05:53:16 AM »
I, for one, think that, on the contrary, your talk is irrelevant and clutters the thread devoted to discussing a theory. I've already expressed that opinion in several different ways but you're ignoring it and continue with the irrelevances. I'm no advocate of @Tinsel Koala with whom, many are aware, I've had issues in the past. Nevertheless, as a matter of principle, it has to be understood that when a theory is being discussed and in the course of that discussion certain inexactless in the terminology is uttered (as is usually the case) that should not divert the discussion into a talk about semantics and memorized definitions but the scientific discourse should rather continue unperturbed along its main course.
i don't care...because your opinion is irrelevant to my issue with tinselkoala. mint?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: i have proof!
« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2011, 05:53:16 AM »

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2011, 06:00:24 AM »
I know, but that's not a discussion. That defies the core essence of a debate.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #47 on: February 09, 2011, 06:03:27 AM »
I know, but that's not a discussion. That defies the core essence of a debate.
tu stultus es... you are not necessary for a discussion between tinselkoala and myself. ::)

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #48 on: February 09, 2011, 06:11:34 AM »
If that's the case, you should leave this discussion dedicated to a theory and should carry on your discussion somewhere else. That's an elementary rule regarding the hygiene of a scientific debate.


Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #49 on: February 09, 2011, 06:13:08 AM »
If that's the case, you should leave this discussion dedicated to a theory and should carry on your discussion somewhere else. That's an elementary rule regarding the hygiene of a scientific debate.
i'm not in a scientific debate you mental midget... ::) i'm correcting tinselkoala's made up definition of coherent. i'm still waiting on his rebuttal. you're the one wandering off on tangents of logical fallacy and semantics. we've been over this son, try and keep up...

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: i have proof!
« Reply #49 on: February 09, 2011, 06:13:08 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #50 on: February 09, 2011, 06:15:30 AM »
Of course, you're not in a scientific debate. This is exactly what I'm saying. Therefore, you shouldn't be doing it here.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #51 on: February 09, 2011, 06:18:28 AM »
Of course, you're not in a scientific debate. This is exactly what I'm saying. Therefore, you shouldn't be doing it here.
and you're not in a scientific debate either... ::) thus, you shouldn't be doing it here... ::)
tu stultus es... q.e.d.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: i have proof!
« Reply #51 on: February 09, 2011, 06:18:28 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #52 on: February 09, 2011, 06:29:09 AM »
In fact, I am. I'm waiting for @Tinsel Koala to present the internal contradictions in the "theory" under discussion and in the meantime I'm trying to teach you some good manners regarding a scientific discourse.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: i have proof!
« Reply #53 on: February 09, 2011, 06:36:55 AM »
In fact, I am. I'm waiting for @Tinsel Koala to present the internal contradictions in the "theory" under discussion and in the meantime I'm trying to teach you some good manners regarding a scientific discourse.
by calling someone a liar? and then when shown (by the record) that you are completely in error, you refuse to offer a mea culpa? that's how you teach good manners? well, good luck to you with that. ::)

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: