Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Strategy Ruminations  (Read 85487 times)

11:11

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #30 on: February 20, 2011, 06:17:37 AM »


a strong strategy,
is to tell society,
that the device is using an "alternative" power source.

such as gravity,
the earths magnetic field,
ambient energy that is everywhere in a galaxy,
or whatever power source that allows atoms to function.


they don't have to understand the device.
they just have to be told enough of an explantion,
that they tolerate the devices existance.
so they go back to peacefully grazing on grass.

instead of sinking into a glandular temper tantrum,
and verbally throwing their psychological defications.




Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #31 on: February 20, 2011, 11:57:47 PM »
No way. To talk about using "alternative" energy source, let alone pronouncing gravity and such as energy source is as wrong a strategy as there can be. Remember, gravity is not an energy source and also remember, the claim that your device is tapping in some unknown energy source (zpe, energy from the vacuum etc.) has no scientific basis. Anything scientifically concerning OU, proven beyond a doubt so far, is obtaining of excess energy through saving from the input or by proper assistance by other conservative fields.

In a theoretical sense the greatest obtacle which stands in the way of progress in science let alone reason and integrity is summarized by the wacko statement made by Dirac in Scientific American, 208, 45-53 (1963): "... it is more important to have beauty in one's equations than to have them fit the experiment".

The situation is completely hopeless. Because of understanding such as the one promoted by Dirac now anything goes in physics and it is overwhelmed by complete insanity of a particular kind, epitome of which are the string theories, cosmology and the like. That very particular insanity is promoted to the heavens jealously cutting out quality research in areas such as OU that can bring real progress to science and society.

Fighting that is extremely difficult, as mandatory as it is, and, like I said, that fight can only meet with success by demonstrating a self-sustaining mechanical device (not even electrical). Nothing short of that. This is a war and there's no mercy.

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #32 on: February 21, 2011, 06:29:16 AM »
Omnibus,  A bit off topic but having seen you are not overly big on string theory (sarcastic) could you possibly state a brief summary of what's wrong with string theory or what theory is a better replacement for it?   I have no attachment to string theory but just curious what is wrong with it or what is better in your opinion. 

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #33 on: February 21, 2011, 06:41:20 AM »
The problem with the string theory is that it is based on the theory of relativity (don't confuse theory of relativity with Einstein's "theory" of relativity which is a complete nonsense worthy of no mention whatsoever). The theory of relativity is based on Lorentz transformations which, although mathematically consistent, unfortunately have no physical meaning whatsoever. Remove Lorentz transformations, there will be no string theories and no cosmology. Leave them in, you'll get beautiful equations which physics has no use for. In addition, the "physical" conclusions which one reaches by using these non-physical equations are astoundingly ridiculous, such as the claim for many universes (maybe that makes string theories and such so attractive to crackpots who filled to the brim Barnes and Noble the other day in NYC and will spend their hard earned money on such crap as the book that was plugged in there). This whole mess theoretical physics is in these days (as a result of the systematic confusion for over a century) is due to the damage of good students of Einstein, with thinking messed up by him, such as Dirac, as I cited earlier. That culture of institutionalized nonsense has to be fought vehemently no matter how hoeless such battle may appear today.

11:11

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #34 on: February 23, 2011, 12:44:40 AM »
No way. To talk about using "alternative" energy source, let alone pronouncing gravity and such as energy source is as wrong a strategy as there can be. Remember, gravity is not an energy source and also remember, the claim that your device is tapping in some unknown energy source (zpe, energy from the vacuum etc.) has no scientific basis. Anything scientifically concerning OU, proven beyond a doubt so far, is obtaining of excess energy through saving from the input or by proper assistance by other conservative fields.

In a theoretical sense the greatest obtacle which stands in the way of progress in science let alone reason and integrity is summarized by the wacko statement made by Dirac in Scientific American, 208, 45-53 (1963): "... it is more important to have beauty in one's equations than to have them fit the experiment".

The situation is completely hopeless. Because of understanding such as the one promoted by Dirac now anything goes in physics and it is overwhelmed by complete insanity of a particular kind, epitome of which are the string theories, cosmology and the like. That very particular insanity is promoted to the heavens jealously cutting out quality research in areas such as OU that can bring real progress to science and society.

Fighting that is extremely difficult, as mandatory as it is, and, like I said, that fight can only meet with success by demonstrating a self-sustaining mechanical device (not even electrical). Nothing short of that. This is a war and there's no mercy.



i can point out many things,
that are "wrong",
with your above post.



1:
you have the wrong attitude,
if you want to accomplish something gainful.

you have the right attitude,
if you want to stew in the vile juice of defeat.



the right attitude,
is the single most important thing,
that a person can.

the second most important thing,
is not even half as large,
as the right attitude.

yet the right attitude,
is also the thing,
which a person has the most control over.



2:
you need to be less unconstructively argumentative,
if you wish to avoid needlessly alienating people.

(i do not care if i alienate you, as you have already alienated me.
so i am scott free to talk.)



3:
calling it an "alternative energy source",
is a concept,
this is as close to the truth,
as the average grass grazing excrement-thrower,
is going to understand or accept.


the concept is usually at least 2/3 of the truth, anyway.
where 100% of the relevant details,
are usually no greater than 1/3.

that is right.
a complete idiot,
who has a strong understanding of general concepts,
usually comes much closer to the truth,
than a a common-sense-free fool,
who has a strong understanding of the truth.

that is why the idiot population has come to rule the society.
because the idiot population is usually poor on details, but strong on general concepts.

they were able to generalize the truth well enough to survive, more often than the detail-strong fools were able to survive.

but not well enough,
to avoid 7 cartloads,
of moronic dramatic problems,
that are mostly preventable.



the gravity of this planet,
CAN be used by a device,
to reduce a devices electrical requirements.

so the device produces greater than 100% electrical output.

if that is not "directly" an "energy source",
than it is the effective equivalent,
of an "energy source".



remember that the important part,
is not to accurately describe the process.

but to present the process,
in a way that people,
who have little free time,
little interest,
and little attention span,
can hear about,
without rejecting.



4:
Dirac pointed out an unconstructive,
less than practical behavior,
that he observed in other people
 
a large number of other people,
had already chosen to enact the behavior.

dirac was just declaring that their **** stinks.


dirac just pointed out what they decided to do.
he didn't "make" it popular.

because their behavior,
had already been popular folly,
for centuries.



there has never been a time in recorded history,
where a majority of humans,
prefered the ugly yet complete truth,
over what they felt to be beautiful or pleasant.

partly because the average wage slave,
doesn't love to think often enough or hard enough,
to become more than 25% familiar,
with the whole truth.

and havn't developed the problem solving skills,
to be capable of doing more,
than sweeping a problem under the rug,
a majority of the time.



someone either needs to increase the number,
of intellectually responsible humans in the population....

or they need to make important discoveries,
understandable enough to idiots,
to increase awareness of the inventions.

there is a far better chance in hell of the second happening,
than of the first happening.


because the first would likely require genetic engineering to accomplish.

but the second could mostly be done,
using a combination of understanding,
knowledge,
low-depreciation idea-simplification,
and social charm.



5:
my interest in communicating,
in your general direction,
has been exceeded.

good-bye.



Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #35 on: March 07, 2011, 01:04:44 AM »
Many of you have been following my studies last summer on power balances in transformers, coils and what not and finally of a simple RC circuit. I don't remember what the link to these studies was (maybe someone can help) but the gist was that both theoretically and experimentally it was determined that under certain circumstances (certain voltage offsets) the studies devices are OU. Aside from difficulties some have with the theory itself reproducing these findings experimentally meets with insurmountable difficulties among the members of the forum mainly because of the super expenses needed to get the equipment needed. The expenses are way beyond what almost everybody here can afford.

Now, a great way to reproduce the claims I put forth turned out to be a widely used simulation program called PSpice. Its student version (enough for the studies at hand) is free, anybody can download it and see for himself the validity of the OU claim. There shouldn't be an excuse any more that conditions, expense, infrastructure etc. don't allow for this OU effect to be reproduced independently. Note, this is the only instance so far whereby OU is conclusively proven in a solid-state electric device and, as seen, OU is inherent in the very essence of theory of electricity. I am preparing more texts demonstrating OU inherent in theory other than theory of electricity and will post these texts separately when the time comes.

I've discussed privately the findings I'm presenting here with friends and I'm contemplating to post them also on @poynt99's overunityresearch.com as well as Sean's(CLaNZeR's) overunity.org.uk but haven't decided yet mainly to have the discussions focused in one place. I've traditionally posted here in this forum, the earlier results are posted here (although somewhere in another thread) so I'll start here and then we'll see how it goes.

The main goal is to make these studies mainstream because, as I've said more than once, there is no private money or support that can compete with the finances, infrastructure, societal impact etc. of the Academia which nowadays is usurped by forces promoting sheer nonsense instead of supporting studies that would benefit humanity.

I'm attaching here three files of data obtained by PSpice of a schematic shown below. You may see that the analysis of Pout/Pin is not based on what PSpice uses for the purpose but is very clearly specified and presented outside of PSpice -- in Excel. This is extremely important because, as I've demonstrated earlier, integration and all kinds of additional approximation procedures do nothing else but obscure the effect. Thus, the fewer arithmetic operations the fewer the errors induced by using digital machines will be. In the case at hand the instantaneous Ii and Vi values are calculated exactly and once we have them it's a matter of simple multiplication of Ii*Vi and averaging the obtained products over all members that will bring about the needed value of Pin (same for Ii*Ii*R regarding Pout). Note, Ii*Vi is the instantaneous slope of the energy-time curve and the average slope (averaged over all instantaneous slopes) provides Pin at once. No additional arithmetic involving small numbers -- the fiend of digital machines.

You can see from the spreadsheets I'm attaching that, at negative voltage offset there is not only OU but all the power is returned to the source -- super OU, as it were. On the other hand, positive offsets yield severe underunity. The zero offset gives what's expected -- unity. It may only be guessed why such an important effect has been missed so far -- wrong procedures, voltage offset is never considered and, most likely, pure suppression. It very well may be that someone has seen it but has dismissed it following the brainwashing that OU cannot be in science. People are afraid to lose their jobs and positions at universities for lesser controversies let alone claiming violation of CoE. Recall also what I told you in the Summer -- then I found with astonishment that in most prestigious universities here on the East Coast EE departments don't even consider measuring currents in the student labs let lone in research. Anyway, a lot can be said about this but for now we should focus, I think, on the issue and, of course, ruminate on the strategies to make it known by the mainstream and how to make it become mainstream.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #36 on: March 07, 2011, 04:48:32 PM »
@All,

I know you'll f$&@ing love this. I posted the above results in a forum dedicated to discussing problems of electrical engineering: http://eng-tips.com/threadminder.cfm?pid=238 . Not only was I banned immediately from the forum but the thread and any trace of what I posted was deleted mercilessly.

Before the ban someone, I guess the moderator, posted a reply to the effect that I must have made an error and it's for me and for nobody else to find the error. I replied that I have not made an error in my analysais and if he thinks otherwise he should, kndly, show where the error is. The response was a total ban and deletion of the whole thread.

I thought you might wanna know of this development.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #37 on: March 07, 2011, 05:18:45 PM »
Now, while I'm banned and the thread is deleted, I got this link in my e- mail :  http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=293851 . My reply that I have made no errors in my analysis and if he thinks otherwise he should show where that error is, is missing from the exchange.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #38 on: March 07, 2011, 07:31:57 PM »
Watch this. There's a new development -- I'm still banned but the thread is back with a couple new comments.: http://eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=293851&page=1 .

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #39 on: March 08, 2011, 03:06:51 AM »
Saga continues. Aside from the ban which persists (I wrote an e-mail to the administrator, as is required by that forum; no response so far) the thread is again deleted. While it was alive someone warned me that I underestimate the power of the adversaries and I may not only be banned but my internet access may be curtailed. And all that for posting some little inauspicious set of data ... Pathetic ... Must be very important to ban posting that particular set of data. Thank god we have forums such as this one and a couple of others. It has been infested by trolls and zealous activists lately which made most good participants leave but nevertheless, it's good that we at least have that. Of course, it's not the point to preach to the converted so I'll have to see what further steps I may undertake. The problem is, especially here in the US, any attempt to approach colleagues with this is perceived as a provocation and a personal attack. People are profoundly afraid to lose their jobs. It's really cold outside. Banning in virtual world for something that may seem innocuous tells you in no uncertain terms what will happen to you in the real world where the pain could be really tangible.

teslaalset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #40 on: March 08, 2011, 09:17:29 AM »
@Omnibus,

What are those green and red 'switches' in you circuit diagram?

b.t.w. the earlier discussions were started by you here, if I am correct:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8411.3045
« Last Edit: March 08, 2011, 10:05:30 AM by teslaalset »

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #41 on: March 08, 2011, 02:37:36 PM »
@teslaalset,

Thanks a lot for the link.

These are not switches but are the probes measuring the current I and the voltage V at the points they are placed at. When you run the simulation another screen opens up showing the time transients and you have to have set the probes of what is to be displayed in these graphs.

The program is a killer. It is used by all major research universities as a teaching and research tool. I was really amazed that noone has ever mentioned it so far in our discussions (I, for one, first heard of it a couple of weeks ago due to @poynt99). With this program it becomes really easy to demonstrate what I'm claiming without the need of expensive equipment and obviously that fact scared the hell out of those who are in charge of the eng-tips forum. Evidently, that forum is influential and they don't want to have undergrad and grad students, who are required to use PSpice to suddenly find out something they are not supposed to.

teslaalset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #42 on: March 08, 2011, 02:45:29 PM »
@Omnibus,

You have triggered my curiousity. I will try that program as well as soon as time allows.

But a simple question: if the circuitry is that simple, why not try it in practice?

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #43 on: March 08, 2011, 03:04:43 PM »
@teslaalset,

I was wrong PSpice hasn't been mentioned in our discussions. It has, at that, in that very thread you mentioned above. Check out this: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8411.msg247396#msg247396 . The amazing thing is that if you do the simulation right you'll get a different answer from what that fellow demonstrates. One should not rely on the analysis of the data made by PSpice but should do his own transparent analysis of his own of the data generated by PSpice. So, get the I and V data and process it outside of PSpice, in Excel, say. In a digital machine such as the computer we're using for the calculations one should be careful to reduce the arithmetic to the lowest possible number of operations. Otherwise, inevitable calculation errors are piled up which obscure the effect.

Also, I found PSpice mentioned in other threads of our forum with OU claims (the current RC and LRC claim is the simplest and the most straightforward, as far as I can see. I don't know what the merits of these other claims are). Now that may explain why those controlling eng-tips forum were so prompt is banning me (literally within minutes of posting my reply). They've probably had "bad" experience with others using PSpice and posting resukts they don't like. This is a scandal to no end.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Strategy Ruminations
« Reply #44 on: March 08, 2011, 03:50:13 PM »
Here is an example of a LRC sim. In this particular case the Pout/Pin = 2. Notice, without voltage offset. If, however, the inductance and voltage offset are tweaked little bit one can get the most intriguing negative value of Pout/Pin. Negative value of Pout/Pin means that in addition to obtaining the dissipative heat in the R, all the rest of the energy is returned to the energy source. As I noted more than once, the excess energy in this case is due to the saving from the input. That is the only case of excess energy in solid state devices that I know of that can be demonstrated so categorically.