Check out our Youtube channel for the latest Playlists and updates:https://www.youtube.com/user/overunitydotcom/playlists?view=1&flow=grid

In short, the orbo effect is a convergence or Impedance Match of the L/R Time Constant between the current and the voltage.The inductance of the coil is 961mH at the beginning of the pulse in the Steorn demo talks. At the end of the pulse, the inductance of the coil is 984mH. The difference in inductance between the start and end of the pulse is 23mH. This difference of 23mH divided by 0.63 is 36.5. Let's round 36.5 up to 37. Watch the first minute of this Steorn video to see what I'm talking about.Let me explain the significance of 23mH, 0.63 and 37. The L/R TIME CONSTANT determines the time required for current in an inductor to reach a specific value. One L/R time constant is the time required for the current in an inductor to increase to 63 percent (actually 63.2 percent or 0.632) of the maximum current (Voltage source divided by Resistance), thus the reason for dividing 23mH by 0.63. Each time constant is equal to the time required for the current to increase by 63.2 percent of the difference in value between the current flowing in the inductor and the maximum current. Maximum current flows in the inductor after five L/R time constants are completed.What do you think happens to the voltage in the inductor? The voltage in the inductor will fall approximately 37% of the initial voltage in a time equal to the TIME CONSTANT, thus the reason why 23mH divided by 0.63 equals 37. The voltage will fall another 37% for the next time constant, and so on. What is the importance in the 23mH? It's the number which relates both the L/R time constant of the voltage and current for an impedance match between them, and may also be the pulse width in degrees. This means when the current rises 100% of its maximum current in the first time constant, the voltage will not drop in a time equal to the time constant. The current will reach 100% of its maximum current in the first time constant, because there is a 100% transfer of energy in the first pass (the complete transfer of energy doesn't occur in 5 L/R time constants, but happens in 1 L/R time constant when there is an impedance match) There is no BEMF or CEMF in this system, not even when building the magnetic field in the coil. When there is an impedance match, then there is a 100% energy transfer in 1 L/R time constant.I'm not a member of the SKDB or associated with Steorn in any way. I found a correlation between the L/R TIME CONSTANT and A CONVERGENCE OF THE MOTION CONSTANTS in the publication on the "Quantization of Energy" by Frank Znidarsic on page 9 of 12. All credits go to Frank Znidarsic for his research on the quantum transitional speed, so I could make this connection!

The voltage in the inductor will fall approximately 37% of the initial voltage in a time equal to the TIME CONSTANT, thus the reason why 23mH divided by 0.63 equals 37

The L/R TIME CONSTANT determines the time required for current in an inductor to reach a specific value. One L/R time constant is the time required for the current in an inductor to increase to 63 percent (actually 63.2 percent or 0.632) of the maximum current (Voltage source divided by Resistance), thus the reason for dividing 23mH by 0.63.

I think this needs to be corrected?The L/R TIME CONSTANT is determined by the amount of time required for current in an inductor to reach a specific value (63.2% of maximum current).The way you wrote it sounds like the L/R TC is what determines the time required, but from what I read, the time required IS the constant, which you derive from L, R and 63.2% (1-1/e). This might just be semantics, but that was a confusing point for me when trying to work through what you posted

I appreciate your effort to explain your thoughts!You are referring to 100% energy transfer during 1 L/T TC. Was there evidence of this behavior in Steorn's demonstrations or is this your speculation as to what is occurring?I think I saw in S4T's videos that when the mechanical resonant frequency of the nuclei in an atom matches the speed of light in the material that energy transfer would be 100% and instantaneous. Did I understand that correctly? That may be why I'm hanging up on this, because instant is âˆž greater than Ï„.I have to watch the videos a second and third time, picking them apart, and working through the math to internalize it. Right now I just have a sense of what Frank's work means and implies, I need to understand. I should just duck into a hole for a few weeks until I do. I don't want to derail what you're doing with inappropriate questions. Still learning!

The number 1.094 isn't dimensionless. It's MHz-m.To subtract it from inverse Henries has no meaning . The result of the calculation isn't even close to exact anyway. I know you want to unify the ideas you like, but it just doesn't work out like this.This isn't science, it's numerology.

Yes we are still here and working on it, when we get results we will post them:) , we have not been abducted by aliens, killed by MIB's or are wasting time making stupid posts like the mole trap FREAKS or Paul lowerence We have re wound our coils to get the inductance needed for the E orbo effect, , time variant magnetic interactions have come a long way with Steorn, i say dont wait for our results with the E-orbo, i have seen enough from our Trustee to indicate their effect is REAL (solid state video). So go for it:thumbsup: .Our SS board has already been ordered and will be here soon, we spin our E-orbo this weekend, you need a certain mH and voltage current to get the orbo effect happening,it takes time.. Naudin and no one on the net has this needed value, its a specific number, i cant say any more. Or my ass gets beat.The reason for us taking so long was to learn this mH and voltage current to get the time variant field happening. The solid state board rectifies these learning curves. so when its here (we already ordered it) it will be instant, analog Dc in and measured through an analog meter into a resistive load (heat) . We are not giving up on LEARNING the E- orb , no wayIll post when we have results my friend be patient cheers: we do not sleep or waste time, you can ask the members of Steorn Ash

Wait, I did not know the Orbo effect was ever successfully forward engineered.

63 - 37 = 26. It should be obvious where the 63 and 37 came from.26 / 23mH = 1.1301.130 - 1.094 = 0.036

63 and 37 are percentages. They have no units, same with 26.Then you divide 26 by 23mH, giving 1.13 the units of inverse Henries (technically it's inverse millihenries, but as you mentioned, it's just a matter of decimal places and I don't really care about that)The units of inverse Henry using the least derived units is: meters^2 * kg / C^2Fundamentally, your claim is that 1.13 is close to 1.094, so that is what is represented by dividing 26 by 23 mH. BUT 1.094 is a SPEED, and its basic units are: m / s(again we can convert 1.094 MHz-m, so it would be 1094000 m/s, but I don't care about that)So what you are doing by comparing a number with units of inverse henry (1.13 mH^-1) to speed (1.094E6 m/s) MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER.You say that it's beyond chance to find numbers so close so it must have meaning, but you don't appreciate how remarkably easy it is to throw together some numbers algebraically and get a result within a few percent.

You can divide the henry by the resistance in ohms, which are different units of measurment, to get the time constant, which is also a different unit of measurement. So, why can't you do henry to speed if there is a relationship between them?

inductance could be a factor in the speed of the magnetic field in a material, which relates to m/s. This would definitely correspond to a time varying field if the other parameters, such as voltage, current, and inductance had the correct values. Even if this isn't the case, then maybe the inductance could be part of a function relating to the speed/time of something else.